Traded Michael Hibberd [traded to Melbourne with pick 59 for picks 29 and 68]

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

If that is true then I am sure that the efc will be happy with a 3rd rd selection for a non-starting 22 player ...........
a non starting player at Essendon is worth two first rounders to them, haven't you learnt anything?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Not starting doesn't mean he isn't a good player worthy of good compensation. It's just that there is younger players that have stepped up who play his position.

backpedal.jpg
backpedal.jpg
 
Second rounder, done deal.
Make it quick and easy, other things to focus on in the trade period.
Like a secondary forward target.
 
Given they got a 2nd rounder for Melksham, they have a right to think they are a chance to get it.
Lucky he doesn't play for the Bulldogs then. After they got pick 46 for Liam Jones that would make him worth 3 first rounders
 
Hmmmm, wonder why they finished last? Wouldn't have anything to do with players missing in positions all across the ground? Essendon's stronger position next year is the backline. Hence why he wants to go elsewhere for more opportunities. Would he be worth more at the trade table if he was a forward of the same quality since Essendon are weaker in that end of the ground?

The value should depend on the quality of player he is, not how much it will hurt the club. Would Geelong deserve less compensation for a player than Carlton would because losing a good player would hurt Carlton more? I'd say no.

Where does it state that he wants to go for more opportunities?

If he can't get a game with the bottom team then he's not worth much. 3rd rounder thanks champ
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top