
I think most people would agree that these two champions are the best two players in the league. Apologies to Buckley, Crawford, Grant, Harvey etc, etc, but Hird and Carey are in a class of their own.
So, who would you rather have ?
Being an Essendon fan, people will no doubt accuse me of Bomber bias, but I'd take Hird.
It's difficult for me to justify why, because Carey is an absolute champion in every sense of the word.
BUT, Hird is the complete packae. Hird has so much time. When he gets near the ball, time seems to stand still. His ability to win a "hard ball get", when the ball is at ground level and two players are contesting is the best in the league (including Carey).
Hird is simply not beaten one on one.
His marking is awesome. What makes Hird a great mark is his reading of the play. Carey relys moe on his strength. Hird also runs all day, something which Carey is not necessarily required to do (although I'll admit, he does cover a fair bit of ground)
Hird's stats on the weekend of 35 possessions, and 12 marks is more than what Carey would get. At least possession wise it is. Hird also kicked two goals.
Carey has a bigger and more imposing precense, but Hird has other qualities that I just listed which would leave me to choose Hird over Carey.
Please I am NOT downgrading Carey at all. He is an awesome player, one of the greatest of all time. But my opinion (and it's just my opinion) is that Hird is the player I'd rather have in my team if I had to choose.
Thoughts ?
So, who would you rather have ?
Being an Essendon fan, people will no doubt accuse me of Bomber bias, but I'd take Hird.
It's difficult for me to justify why, because Carey is an absolute champion in every sense of the word.
BUT, Hird is the complete packae. Hird has so much time. When he gets near the ball, time seems to stand still. His ability to win a "hard ball get", when the ball is at ground level and two players are contesting is the best in the league (including Carey).
Hird is simply not beaten one on one.
His marking is awesome. What makes Hird a great mark is his reading of the play. Carey relys moe on his strength. Hird also runs all day, something which Carey is not necessarily required to do (although I'll admit, he does cover a fair bit of ground)
Hird's stats on the weekend of 35 possessions, and 12 marks is more than what Carey would get. At least possession wise it is. Hird also kicked two goals.
Carey has a bigger and more imposing precense, but Hird has other qualities that I just listed which would leave me to choose Hird over Carey.
Please I am NOT downgrading Carey at all. He is an awesome player, one of the greatest of all time. But my opinion (and it's just my opinion) is that Hird is the player I'd rather have in my team if I had to choose.
Thoughts ?