MWPP
Flying High
They still count as home matches for the HawksThey were "home" matches but were played in Tasmania
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
They still count as home matches for the HawksThey were "home" matches but were played in Tasmania
My point is I don't think Hawthorn's "home ground" advantage in Tasmania is comparable to their home ground advantage at the MCG.They still count as home matches for the Hawks
What's this based on ?My point is I don't think Hawthorn's "home ground" advantage in Tasmania is comparable to their home ground advantage at the MCG.
Ditto NM compared to Etihad.
If we were to play a "home" game at an oval that is completely different to Subiaco, then I strongly suggest that we would not dominate middling sides to the extent that we do at Subiaco.
Just like Hawthorn and NM didn't dominate St Kilda and Melbourne respectively.
Surely that's not that hard to understand
Yeah good points. We don't play any home games away from Subi so the whole argument is a bit moot.What's this based on ?
Probably not stats
As I'm pretty sure the Hawks' winning % at Aurora is better than at the MCG
And that if anything , Aurora offers them more of a home ground advantage (especially against fellow Victorian teams) than the MCG
North have changed their *home away from home * a few times so it may be a little too early to tell, but I suspect their Tassie record stacks up, too .
Ultimately, I don't subscribe to the Sheahan theory that away home games sold *by choice* for $ are any harder than home ones.
(It's different when home games are forced to be played away though eg our/other non-Vic sides' away "home" finals at the G)
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I agree with you as big losses can effect a players confidence. With a close game you could say we were good enough just luck didn't go our way?it depends tho. I would take 10-20 point loss cause it shows your just about there against the best away but a string of 1-6 point loss will be demorsalizing and highlights a sides inability to win in close games. However, i would a take a couple of them over a hawks or even a swans performance.
I think the reason they say that is due to our poor showing in the GF last year, and that we need to be able to beat the top sides away if we wish to win a GF considering its played at the MCG.My point is that the only reasonable comparison to us playing away is other sides traveling just as far.
Until we get beaten at home I don't see how we are home track bullies any more than anyone else facing the same challenge. Crossing the Nullabor to beat a decent side is really hard.
definitly. I think it could even carry into interstate games against average opponents as well.I agree with you as big losses can effect a players confidence. With a close game you could say we were good enough just luck didn't go our way?
Too soon for that - you never know Freo may improve in the second half of the seasonThe good news is that with Freo being abysmal this year , we can now pencil in the other derby as a win (usually they're split , and at times , we have gone 0-2, so I assumed we would lose one at the start of the year ).
Pies at the MCG is another game I assumed we would lose when I went through our draw (given our embarrassing record against them over there ) , but am now sure we can win![]()
My point is I don't think Hawthorn's "home ground" advantage in Tasmania is comparable to their home ground advantage at the MCG.
Ditto NM compared to Etihad.
If we were to play a "home" game at an oval that is completely different to Subiaco, then I strongly suggest that we would not dominate middling sides to the extent that we do at Subiaco.
Just like Hawthorn and NM didn't dominate St Kilda and Melbourne respectively.
Surely that's not that hard to understand
I have a feeling that Freo have now embraced rebuilding, unfortunately. I'd be surprised if Fyfe returns this year . I kind of selfishly hope Freo are competitive (not against us though, obvious ) - because if they continue to be beaten by the likes of lowly Carlton at home, it will undermine our attempts to keep it a fortresss . I'm sure both teams benefited from each other's strong home form last yearToo soon for that - you never know Freo may improve in the second half of the seasononce Sandilands comes back. Not sure how long Johnson and the precious one will be out for?
I hope they don't win a game all year, I haven't forgotten how cocky their supporters were 3 years ago. Kept telling them this was going to happen and enjoy the success they were having because the wheels were going to fall off quickly i couldn't be happier to be honest.. But i know what your sayingI have a feeling that Freo have now embraced rebuilding, unfortunately. I'd be surprised if Fyfe returns this year . I kind of selfishly hope Freo are competitive (not against us though, obvious ) - because if they continue to be beaten by the likes of lowly Carlton at home, it will undermine our attempts to keep it a fortresss . I'm sure both teams benefited from each other's strong home form last year
Again, except for Hawthorn v GWS and our two matches, those were all competitive games. Geelong almost snatched the game in the final quarter. I really hope Simpson isn't coddling the players into thinking their performances are on par with the rest of the comphttps://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/afl/a/31519535/interstate-wins-not-just-an-eagles-problem/
I'm glad someone in the media has picked this up, hopefully it makes it east.
We beat Collingwood at Etihad, not the MCG.https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/sport/afl/a/31519535/interstate-wins-not-just-an-eagles-problem/
I'm glad someone in the media has picked this up, hopefully it makes it east.
I don't think he is and I doubt that those performances would be acceptable internally. But other teams, particularly victorian sides, don't get slammed as much as we do for our interstate record (and I'm sure Simmo would be annoyed at copping that at every press conference). The excuse they give for that is "but the GF is played on the MCG." It doesn't change the fact that it's hard to win away against good sides, and those top vic sides don't do it all that often either. Only one way to silence the knockers though, beat a top four team away.Again, except for Hawthorn v GWS and our two matches, those were all competitive games. Geelong almost snatched the game in the final quarter. I really hope Simpson isn't coddling the players into thinking their performances are on par with the rest of the comp
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/contact/We beat Collingwood at Etihad, not the MCG.
Yeah, which is the level we need to be at if we want to win one.Since 2012 the only teams that have a positive winning record against top 8 sides interstate are Sydney (10-8) and Hawthorn (7-5). Guess which teams have won the flags during that period.
It's a world wide phenomenon
Home teams play better at home ...there has been plenty of research on it.
That said I'm glad our new oval will be wider and closer to MCG specs ....
We do get lost on the MCG ......we don't switch the ball very well because at Subiaco we don't switch the ball much and our skills aren't good enough to switch ...we lack real elite kickers to switch the ball on the MCG is my theory of the current team.
Interestingly , we also beat a top 8 side away in 2011 (our other recent finals year )too (Carlton, albeit at Etihad ).The 2 wins to top 8 teams interstate occurred in 2012 and 2015 which happens to be the same years we made the top 8. All the other years where we didn't win against a top 8 side interstate we didn't make the finals. Seems obvious I guess so we better start winning against the better teams away or we will find ourselves either missing out or close to the bottom 8.
Im not an avid follower of WAFL but is this the same case in WAFL?
