Mega Thread Hot Topic - Drugs and AFL

Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Posts
53,167
Likes
67,424
Location
SE Oz
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
The Mighty Blacks
Yeah, saw that program at the time. I don't recall mention of coaches supplying players though, including teenagers. That is the big bit of news for me out of this article.
Thats why I said the program hinted at it because the program talked about how insidious it had become and gotten deep into the community - and rural sports is such a part of rural life. There was scene at a local sports club. As I said in my first or second post in this thread 2.5 years ago - when it comes to drugs in sport, PED or illicit drugs, you have to join dots to find out and understand what's really going on.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Posts
53,167
Likes
67,424
Location
SE Oz
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
The Mighty Blacks
Also - was chatting to a dude at the pub tonight who work's in Freo's sports science department and he was saying that at it's height, Essendon's injection program proscribed 20 injections per player per week.

That's 3 a day. Pharmacologically experimental environment indeed!
Your friend is correct if Colostrum and Tribulus were injected and not taken orally. These two are legitimate multivitamins. From the AFL's charge sheet against Essendon.

http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL Tenant/AFL/Files/EssendonFC-notice-of-charges.pdf

68. Following that meeting, 38 players at the Club signed “Patient Information/Informed Consent” forms in relation to these four substances. In relation to these substances, those 38 players agreed to:
(a) one AOD-9604 injection per week for the season;
(b) one Thymosin injection once a week for six weeks and then one injection per month;
(c) two Colostrum daily in each training week and two colostrum post-game. The dose may vary according to training needs; and
(d) one Tribulus forte daily in each training week and one Tribulus prior to the game. The dose may vary according to training needs.

69. If the dosages the subject of the “Patient Information/Informed Consent” forms were administered, the playing group would receive in the order of:
(a) more than 1,500 injections of AOD-9064 and Thymosin; and
(b) more than 16,500 doses of Colostrum; and
(c) more than 8,000 doses of Tribulus.

http://www.afl.com.au/staticfile/AFL Tenant/AFL/Files/EssendonFC-notice-of-charges.pdf
 

TeeKray

Moderator
Joined
Mar 1, 2014
Posts
8,490
Likes
39,938
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Moderator #3,356
If not found guilty and WADA appeals straight to CAS then they could miss a year or two whilst they are provisionally suspended and CAS finally gets to hear their case. Whilst the AFL tribunal is independent of AFL executives and Commissioners and chairman David Jones QC will not be listening to what AFL wants, he will consider the ramifications of a wrist slap to the players, as being a potential big issue in this process coming to its final legal conclusion ie it could go on well past his ruling.
Yep. It's in everyone's interests that the end game is a 6 monthish backdated suspension with the players missing only a month or two of actual games. And we've been buttered up for that outcome for close to a year.
 

Garibaldi Red

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Posts
7,068
Likes
12,006
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Nottingham Forest

Tibbs

Premiership Player
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Posts
3,634
Likes
7,544
Location
Brisbane
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
A former Essendon player is planning to take legal action against the AFL and the Essendon Football Club

Wow! This is going to get ugly! The players have been screwed by Essendon, and then reamed by the AFL! It woulnt suprise me if more players sue, especially if they are found guilty, and it affects their careers & remuneration as players. How can Hird, and the other Essendon officials involved, sleep at night?!!
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Andre

Premium Platinum
Joined
Sep 3, 2002
Posts
22,627
Likes
23,777
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
If not found guilty and WADA appeals straight to CAS then they could miss a year or two whilst they are provisionally suspended and CAS finally gets to hear their case. Whilst the AFL tribunal is independent of AFL executives and Commissioners and chairman David Jones QC will not be listening to what AFL wants, he will consider the ramifications of a wrist slap to the players, as being a potential big issue in this process coming to its final legal conclusion ie it could go on well past his ruling.
No way the AFL is going to cop a 2 year suspension of Essendon. The TV networks would want money back, as they'd need to be either excluded from the draw altogether (8 games instead of 9) or their games are such farces with top-ups they'd say they aren't worth showing anyway.

The AFL only reluctantly joined ASADA / WADA to get some government funding. They're big enough to do without it and if push came to shove, IMO, they'd withdraw, wear the flack and move on. AFL fans aren't going to abandon the sport and there's no higher than AFL level competition like the Olympics they can be excluded from.
 

Andre

Premium Platinum
Joined
Sep 3, 2002
Posts
22,627
Likes
23,777
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Kyle Reimers, wouldn't be anyone else. An action like this means he is likely anticipating a guilty verdict.
Not necessarily. If he thinks he was given things he wasn't aware of, he can think he's innocent of doping, but still have been given shit that's detrimental. That's effectively Ryder's position.
 

Doctor Feel

Shitposter In Chief
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Posts
54,534
Likes
138,338
Location
#BringBackTheBars
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Not necessarily. If he thinks he was given things he wasn't aware of, he can think he's innocent of doping, but still have been given shit that's detrimental. That's effectively Ryder's position.
Ryder and Monfries are both allowing Essendon to represent them in court, they haven't gone it alone. It wouldn't be them. It's likely Reimers (given his previous opinion on it all) and possibly Lovett.
 

Killer Power

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Posts
7,235
Likes
10,366
Location
Dungeon
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Posts
53,167
Likes
67,424
Location
SE Oz
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
The Mighty Blacks
No way the AFL is going to cop a 2 year suspension of Essendon. The TV networks would want money back, as they'd need to be either excluded from the draw altogether (8 games instead of 9) or their games are such farces with top-ups they'd say they aren't worth showing anyway.

The AFL only reluctantly joined ASADA / WADA to get some government funding. They're big enough to do without it and if push came to shove, IMO, they'd withdraw, wear the flack and move on. AFL fans aren't going to abandon the sport and there's no higher than AFL level competition like the Olympics they can be excluded from.
I'm not really sure what you are saying. The AFL have no say in what their tribunal says. The AFL have no say in what CAS says. If the AFL tribunal succumbs and trys to rule a wrist slap ruling, then WADA will appeal straight to CAS and the AFL will have to wear the players being out of the game for as long as it takes for CAS to hear the case, and then make a ruling. Bad Flaming Luck

The AFL can jump up and down and leave the WADA Code but these guys know the PR consequence of doing that and the cancellation of government funding for footy and community programming and most importantly for stadium infrastructure, although most grounds now have been upgrade or funding like Burswood stadium has been fully committed.
 

PatientMental

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jul 17, 2010
Posts
14,466
Likes
21,977
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
The problem with everything is that anti-doping has been setup to punish individuals in sport not teams, it's why American sports refuse to comply with the WADA code because it's a useless system when more than one person is involved. The case of Amed Saad was an easy one, given an 18 month suspension without any hesitation after testing positive to a banned substance found in an energy drink. It's setup for that, because it's a swift positive test to sentence verdict.

But when it comes to a group of 34 players on top of never tested positive it becomes incredibly muddied and difficult to handle.

What ASADA had to argue against Saad:
Positive samples of the energy drink 'Before Battle' containing the banned substance methylsynephrine.
Saad confessing to his club doctor and then ASADA that he took the banned substance match day.

What ASADA has to argue against Essendon:
0 positive A samples.
~40 various accounts of what happened
A practice of injecting the players with ASADA compliant substances.
But because it's similar to Brisbane's IV drip re-hydration of the early 2000's the injection program was punished by the AFL purely from the bad look on the game.​
An alleged practice of injecting the players with non-ASADA compliant substances.
Dank refusing to be questioned about the practice.

If ASADA somehow finds positive samples of physical proof banned ASADA substances:
The 18 month - 2 year ban will be handed down, destroying Essendon and they'll take the AFL down with them.
Potentially backdated to show cause letter date and Essendon will take them to court to back date it to original investigation date.

If ASADA has no physical proof banned ASADA substances were administered and used on players:
The players will cop a short to medium ban because of a lack of due care for their players welfare.

No matter what the outcome, Essendon are probably going to try and sue the pants off of ASADA/WADA for damages.

The WADA code does not work with team sports and until they rewrite an entire law to include team situations like this one, it will never work.
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Posts
53,167
Likes
67,424
Location
SE Oz
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
The Mighty Blacks
The problem with everything is that anti-doping has been setup to punish individuals in sport not teams, it's why American sports refuse to comply with the WADA code because it's a useless system when more than one person is involved. The case of Amed Saad was an easy one, given an 18 month suspension without any hesitation after testing positive to a banned substance found in an energy drink. It's setup for that, because it's a swift positive test to sentence verdict.

But when it comes to a group of 34 players on top of never tested positive it becomes incredibly muddied and difficult to handle.

What ASADA had to argue against Saad:
Positive samples of the energy drink 'Before Battle' containing the banned substance methylsynephrine.
Saad confessing to his club doctor and then ASADA that he took the banned substance match day.

What ASADA has to argue against Essendon:
0 positive A samples.
~40 various accounts of what happened
A practice of injecting the players with ASADA compliant substances.
But because it's similar to Brisbane's IV drip re-hydration of the early 2000's the injection program was punished by the AFL purely from the bad look on the game.​
An alleged practice of injecting the players with non-ASADA compliant substances.
Dank refusing to be questioned about the practice.

If ASADA somehow finds positive samples of physical proof banned ASADA substances:
The 18 month - 2 year ban will be handed down, destroying Essendon and they'll take the AFL down with them.
Potentially backdated to show cause letter date and Essendon will take them to court to back date it to original investigation date.

If ASADA has no physical proof banned ASADA substances were administered and used on players:
The players will cop a short to medium ban because of a lack of due care for their players welfare.

No matter what the outcome, Essendon are probably going to try and sue the pants off of ASADA/WADA for damages.

The WADA code does not work with team sports and until they rewrite an entire law to include team situations like this one, it will never work.
If 34 Essendon players tested positive to a ban drugged the AFL/WADA code would have worked fine. Its when you dont have a positive and you have to go thru a long investigation process that it effects the day to day running of a team sports.
 

Garibaldi Red

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Posts
7,068
Likes
12,006
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Nottingham Forest
If the players are found 'not guilty' and WADA/ASADA appeal to CAS, do they get to play or do they remain provisionally suspended?
Even the AFL signing off on the new WADA case will not help them play in Round 1

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...don-ryan-crowley/story-fni5f22o-1227275368272
AFL will sign off on new WADA code but little benefit for Essendon, Ryan Crowley
THE AFL Commission will sign off on the 2015 edition of the World Anti-Doping Agency code at Tuesday’s meeting, but there will be no immediate benefit to Docker Ryan Crowley or the “Essendon 34”.
.......
The provisions will not be a factor in the Essendon case — where there was potential for the Bombers to be allowed to play between next Tuesday’s verdict and, should they be found guilty, the final determination of a sanction.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...don-ryan-crowley/story-fni5f22o-1227275368272
 

It Just Is

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Posts
5,909
Likes
9,012
Location
On cloud 9
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Can suck it!
Work safe Victoria should feel fairly ashamed that an individual needs to take such a well publisised case to Court.

Or does an AFL imposed fine excuse them of any responsibility?
 

Andre

Premium Platinum
Joined
Sep 3, 2002
Posts
22,627
Likes
23,777
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
The AFL can jump up and down and leave the WADA Code but these guys know the PR consequence of doing that and the cancellation of government funding for footy and community programming and most importantly for stadium infrastructure, although most grounds now have been upgrade or funding like Burswood stadium has been fully committed.
The government isn't going to shut out the AFL long term, let's remember they don't give the AFL money out of the goodness of their hearts, it's for votes. Those voters aren't going to disappear and you can bet one of the major parties in close seat(s) would quickly be back giving / offering money to get wins.

Bad PR in the short term is more manageable for the AFL, IMO, then risking losing TV rights and other monies from other than the government in the short / medium term.
 

Andre

Premium Platinum
Joined
Sep 3, 2002
Posts
22,627
Likes
23,777
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
The problem with everything is that anti-doping has been setup to punish individuals in sport not teams, it's why American sports refuse to comply with the WADA code because it's a useless system when more than one person is involved. The case of Amed Saad was an easy one, given an 18 month suspension without any hesitation after testing positive to a banned substance found in an energy drink. It's setup for that, because it's a swift positive test to sentence verdict.

But when it comes to a group of 34 players on top of never tested positive it becomes incredibly muddied and difficult to handle.
Individual sports it's easy. Athlete talks to their people, clarifies if unsure with ASADA. It's f-ing ridiculous to expect 34 players to all ring ASADA to clarify everything. That's why team sports the Doctor and club have to be taking more responsibility. Along with the coach and IMO those in the Essendon 2012 leadership group.

It's nice in theory that the players all line up so they can in turn talk to the ASADA rep (as it's meant to be every player for themselves so they can't trust what anyone else says), but idiotic in practise in a large team sport environment. With such a large group they should be able to rely on a designated person / people to handle any queries as required. Again the players as a whole should have been able to rely on Watson and the other leadership group members as their 'go to' people with the rest of the world to come back to them if there were any concerns. It's why I think the penalties should differ between the 34. The bulk deserve the 6 months backdated, but I'd give the leadership group 12 months. They were chosen to be the players reps and massively let the rest down.
 
Top Bottom