- Aug 30, 2017
- 16,091
- 66,424
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Watch this space.
Hanneberry or Barrett?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Watch this space.
Can I come back to it later?Watch this space.
Best thing to do with this worm is just ignore anything he says , replying to anything he says is just giving him what he wants.
To be fair, I thought it was a horrible deal when I heard about it. Lether's is very good mates with Hanner's old man, I believe his old man got him his gig at Old Xav's back in the day which probably started his journey towards the AFL.
I have also heard about Hanner's having a "good off-season". Enough for me to think there's no way we'll get $800k a year worth out of him.
The deal was a very very risky one and lots of water to go under the bridge before you can say it's successful but it won't take much to say it's not.
I'd actually believe Barrett's take on this especially seeing as how keen Sydney were to offload him.
Just proves the guy is a idiotGuess who’s picked us for the spoon?!
I heard Melbourne gave theirs a purple suit , and put theirs in the media.Every village needs an idiot
Apparently Hannebery is now at least 6 weeks away from playing according to Richo if I heard him correctly on SEN - His body has to be "re-built".Really who cares if the guys gets wiped out on his time off , by the sounds his been like that for years .
We all know Hannerbery was let go due salary cap problems for the Swans and he wasn't performing due to injury and they must of figured they had got the best out of him.
We got him because we wanted another leader and they have backed him in to get him on the park , If we can get him on the park he will be a bonus to the squad and by what people on here have noticed at training he has been very vocal and a leader.
Barrett was the same guy who canned Carlisle
Very easy for these media types to s///can a player , but what Barrett is doing is burning his bridges , noway would the Swans would like him saying that they fell off there chairs from laughter when he was selected in our leadership group when he was vice captain for the Swans last year.
He wound up Mcquire at the Magpies about rumors about players and who also dreaded up crap in the Dogs camp - now he is trying to get in the news by attacking a player - not a very nice guy.
We now have a multi All Australian in our squad which we don't have , a leader , by all accounts a good bloke and if he gets on the park a very damaging player that we need.
Remember we had excess cap space - we would lose if we didn't use it , front load his contract and no problems.
We have taken a gamble and we knew that , if he gets on the park it will be a bonus.
If he a flop he will not be the only one that has not worked out for us.
Apparently Hannebery is now at least 6 weeks away from playing according to Richo if I heard him correctly on SEN - His body has to be "re-built".
I don't care how good his "training standards" or "leadership qualities" are, if he's not getting on the park there is no way in hell he is worth for $800k a year. Not only do you have to get on the park, you have to be able to perform for $800k. The AFL isn't a charity, being loud and training hard doesn't get you a gig. If training standards aren't up to scratch, bring in a training standards coach for $100k.
There were lots of free agents available during the trade period. I'd like to know why they limited themselves to just Hannebery well before the trade period even began. I suspect it had something to do with Leather's relationship with his old man. Essentially we ruled ourselves out of many opportunities as a result.
Scully would have been a much better risk/reward for $800k than hannerbery every day of the week.
#IPF is straight down the line and unbiased lewdogsInteresting that Damian tipped against us this weekend. Has also tipped us to finish last. They are pretty ballsy tips - hope his judgement isn't clouded.
Where did I mention round 1? Won't be at least till round 4 in the VFL, so probably round 6 at the earliest for AFL appearance.Yeah we were stupid getting a player who won't play round 1.
Can't wait to see Scully in action this weekend.
The AFL pays for Hanners $800k, not the club. So there's no problem there.Apparently Hannebery is now at least 6 weeks away from playing according to Richo if I heard him correctly on SEN - His body has to be "re-built".
I don't care how good his "training standards" or "leadership qualities" are, if he's not getting on the park there is no way in hell he is worth for $800k a year. Not only do you have to get on the park, you have to be able to perform for $800k. The AFL isn't a charity, being loud and training hard doesn't get you a gig. If training standards aren't up to scratch, bring in a training standards coach for $100k.
There were lots of free agents available during the trade period. I'd like to know why they limited themselves to just Hannebery well before the trade period even began. I suspect it had something to do with Leather's relationship with his old man. Essentially we ruled ourselves out of many opportunities as a result.
Scully would have been a much better risk/reward for $800k than hannerbery every day of the week.
The $800k comez out of the clubs salary cap.The AFL pays for Hanners $800k, not the club. So there's no problem there.
The $100k for the extra coach would be paid by the club, and his name is Billy Slater. So there's phoblem here either.
And Scully didn't want to come to our club. The same as every top player we've wanted in the last decade excluding Jake.
I'm not saying it is Skid. There just seems to be some misunderstands crept in lately about how the system works. Players wages are funded by the league not the club. The club manages the payments to fall within the caps.The $800k comez out of the clubs salary cap.
Please lets not make out that $800k over 4 +1 years to a cellar dweller club is meaningless.
The $800k comez out of the clubs salary cap.
Please lets not make out that $800k over 4 +1 years to a cellar dweller club is meaningless.
Chaz you are correct.Apparently Hannebery is now at least 6 weeks away from playing according to Richo if I heard him correctly on SEN - His body has to be "re-built".
I don't care how good his "training standards" or "leadership qualities" are, if he's not getting on the park there is no way in hell he is worth for $800k a year. Not only do you have to get on the park, you have to be able to perform for $800k. The AFL isn't a charity, being loud and training hard doesn't get you a gig. If training standards aren't up to scratch, bring in a training standards coach for $100k.
There were lots of free agents available during the trade period. I'd like to know why they limited themselves to just Hannebery well before the trade period even began. I suspect it had something to do with Leather's relationship with his old man. Essentially we ruled ourselves out of many opportunities as a result.
Scully would have been a much better risk/reward for $800k than hannerbery every day of the week.
Scully flat out said he did not want to come to our clubApparently Hannebery is now at least 6 weeks away from playing according to Richo if I heard him correctly on SEN - His body has to be "re-built".
I don't care how good his "training standards" or "leadership qualities" are, if he's not getting on the park there is no way in hell he is worth for $800k a year. Not only do you have to get on the park, you have to be able to perform for $800k. The AFL isn't a charity, being loud and training hard doesn't get you a gig. If training standards aren't up to scratch, bring in a training standards coach for $100k.
There were lots of free agents available during the trade period. I'd like to know why they limited themselves to just Hannebery well before the trade period even began. I suspect it had something to do with Leather's relationship with his old man. Essentially we ruled ourselves out of many opportunities as a result.
Scully would have been a much better risk/reward for $800k than hannerbery every day of the week.
The SL factor is a huge worry in this have said a couple times the Swans knew he was cookedWhere did I mention round 1? Won't be at least till round 4 in the VFL, so probably round 6 at the earliest for AFL appearance.
Scully tipped to return in 2 weeks time.
Andt Scully doesn't need to be "rebuilt".
https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-03-22/saints-resigned-to-rebuilding-sore-former-swan
"Did we think it was going to be as significant as this? No, we didn't."
"We did know we were getting a bloke that we needed, to some extent, rebuild, but probably not to this extent."
Do you think their Due Diligence was impactyed by Lether's and his one-eyed-ness in signing a good mate's son?
I'm guessing we won't see hannebery until, at the earliest, round 8.