Remove this Banner Ad

Team Mgmt. How Essendon should rig the 2026 draft

  • Thread starter Thread starter RJK Tiger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

RJK Tiger

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 29, 2020
Posts
5,480
Reaction score
12,725
AFL Club
Richmond
First off, i come in peace. Tough times for both our clubs. Trying to rebuild in the current AFL landscape is a joke - you gotta think outside the square to get ahead in this world. So here is a very legal way for Essendon to rig the 2026 AFL draft to maximum advantage.

Zach Merrett clearly wants out. I think Essendon did the right thing standing its ground on him last year, but based on 2026 already, I can't see that playing out the same if/when he tries to push himself out the door again.

So lets devise the plan to make it a win / win for everyone.

Remember "The Veale Deal" ? When Jade Rawlings wanted out & the Dogs traded you Lachlan Veale for pick 6?

Remember when Daniher went to the Lions? Then 12 months later he re-negotiated his contract?

Do both of that with Zach.

Trade a non-required player to the Hawks for their 1st rounder with a mutual understanding tyou will allow Zach to move in the 2026 off-season, a year early.


Then, Re-negotiate his contract so that instead of it expiring in 2027, it ends in 2026. There is no rule against this.

This makes him a free agent at years end. Which then allows you access to a compo pick.

If you finish bottom, you will get pick 2 for him, plus the Hawks first round pick this year as a "Veale Deale"

The AFL let the Lions re-negotiate the Daniher deal, so what rules are you breaking by doing the same to allow Zach to leave? The AFL also allowed the "Bowes" deal between Gold Coast and the Cats, which saw Geelong get Bowes & Pick 7 for a future 3rd round pick.

The Hawks would happily play along, as they only give away one 1st rounder to get Zach, instead of 3. It also allows the club to break ties with Zach in a mutually friendly way, avoid all the drama of trade period. Its clean & everyone has a clear understanding of what is happening. You can even agree then just just sit Zach for the remainder of the year to avoid serious injury, if the Hawks want to add a 2nd round pick to the Veale Deal.

And for you guys, getting pick 2 & 14(is) for Zach is a much better deal than the package you were offered last year, which most likely - will be worse this year.

You can even agree then just just sit Zach for the remainder of the year to avoid serious injury, if the Hawks want to add a 2nd round pick to the Veale Deal.

The system is completely rigged against our clubs, with the AFL happily allowing broken systems to be exploited by the teams which represent their interest. You 2025 draft was a great step in the right direction. Going into this year with possibly pick 1,2 & 14 would be the moment where your club can actually rebuild in the way you need to - from the tippy top.
 
First off, i come in peace. Tough times for both our clubs. Trying to rebuild in the current AFL landscape is a joke - you gotta think outside the square to get ahead in this world. So here is a very legal way for Essendon to rig the 2026 AFL draft to maximum advantage.

Zach Merrett clearly wants out. I think Essendon did the right thing standing its ground on him last year, but based on 2026 already, I can't see that playing out the same if/when he tries to push himself out the door again.

So lets devise the plan to make it a win / win for everyone.

Remember "The Veale Deal" ? When Jade Rawlings wanted out & the Dogs traded you Lachlan Veale for pick 6?

Remember when Daniher went to the Lions? Then 12 months later he re-negotiated his contract?

Do both of that with Zach.

Trade a non-required player to the Hawks for their 1st rounder with a mutual understanding tyou will allow Zach to move in the 2026 off-season, a year early.


Then, Re-negotiate his contract so that instead of it expiring in 2027, it ends in 2026. There is no rule against this.

This makes him a free agent at years end. Which then allows you access to a compo pick.

If you finish bottom, you will get pick 2 for him, plus the Hawks first round pick this year as a "Veale Deale"

The AFL let the Lions re-negotiate the Daniher deal, so what rules are you breaking by doing the same to allow Zach to leave? The AFL also allowed the "Bowes" deal between Gold Coast and the Cats, which saw Geelong get Bowes & Pick 7 for a future 3rd round pick.

The Hawks would happily play along, as they only give away one 1st rounder to get Zach, instead of 3. It also allows the club to break ties with Zach in a mutually friendly way, avoid all the drama of trade period. Its clean & everyone has a clear understanding of what is happening. You can even agree then just just sit Zach for the remainder of the year to avoid serious injury, if the Hawks want to add a 2nd round pick to the Veale Deal.

And for you guys, getting pick 2 & 14(is) for Zach is a much better deal than the package you were offered last year, which most likely - will be worse this year.

You can even agree then just just sit Zach for the remainder of the year to avoid serious injury, if the Hawks want to add a 2nd round pick to the Veale Deal.

The system is completely rigged against our clubs, with the AFL happily allowing broken systems to be exploited by the teams which represent their interest. You 2025 draft was a great step in the right direction. Going into this year with possibly pick 1,2 & 14 would be the moment where your club can actually rebuild in the way you need to - from the tippy top.
Na they wouldnt give us pick 2. The formula includes player age and zach is already 30
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Na they wouldnt give us pick 2. The formula includes player age and zach is already 30


Then that might be your issue then - otherwise - what is stopping any club who is about to finish bottom 3 from doing the same?

Daniher was pretty old when he left i thought?
 
Then that might be your issue then - otherwise - what is stopping any club who is about to finish bottom 3 from doing the same?

Daniher was pretty old when he left i thought?
I dont have an issue with your scheme, im just telling you it wouldnt work with Merrett because he is 30 and the clubs know age is a large part of the AFLs free agency compensation formula.

Please press on with your plan, iron out the kinks and get back to us when its ready and we can have pick 2.

Daniher was 26 when he went to Brisbane
 
I dont have an issue with your scheme, im just telling you it wouldnt work with Merrett because he is 30 and the clubs know age is a large part of the AFLs free agency compensation formula.

Please press on with your plan, iron out the kinks and get back to us when its ready and we can have pick 2.

Daniher was 26 when he went to Brisbane

no beefs from me mate - if the age rule is a hurdle, then you need to work around it & I'm not all over the way the compo picks are worked out. In saying that, if you say to the hawks - want to give us 3 first round picks, or get him for free? I'm pretty sure the Hawks would listen pretty hard to whats required.

Point here is - the system is completely broken and clubs like ours need to stop complaining about it & start being pricks about it. I will give Ross Lyon & the Saints some credit here. They have recognized that under the current order, there is no exit ramp on their hamster wheel. So they have zagged & seem empowered to start poking the bear. I actually would love to see the Saints do well this year as i respect their decision to not keep repeating the same stuff, that does not work. Same reason i respected the Dons for saying "No" to Zach. You don't win anything by being agreeable in this era.

If there is anything we have learned from the Trump era is, when dealing with institutions that are government by a text law - it can be exploited, legally, by the person who has the biggest imagination of what "legally" means.
 
no beefs from me mate - if the age rule is a hurdle, then you need to work around it & I'm not all over the way the compo picks are worked out. In saying that, if you say to the hawks - want to give us 3 first round picks, or get him for free? I'm pretty sure the Hawks would listen pretty hard to whats required.

Point here is - the system is completely broken and clubs like ours need to stop complaining about it & start being pricks about it. I will give Ross Lyon & the Saints some credit here. They have recognized that under the current order, there is no exit ramp on their hamster wheel. So they have zagged & seem empowered to start poking the bear. I actually would love to see the Saints do well this year as i respect their decision to not keep repeating the same stuff, that does not work. Same reason i respected the Dons for saying "No" to Zach. You don't win anything by being agreeable in this era.

If there is anything we have learned from the Trump era is, when dealing with institutions that are government by a text law - it can be exploited, legally, by the person who has the biggest imagination of what "legally" means.
Restriction of trade angle?
 
Interesting and fun angle but AFL would block any such actions. They're a lot stricter now and FA compo is a mystery.

The best way any trade regarding Merrett plays out is if he stops with the "only one team" BS and becomes open to multiple, which creates more of a bidding war. This is where Curnow and Trac did better, they were more flexible. It was Zach that stifled an exit not us.
 
The foundation is there though, you just need to work out how to make RJK Tigers plan work. Its smart business, we get pick 1 (our pick) pick 2 (compo) pick 6 (lachlan veale) and pick 14 (hawthorne) for Merrette

I think the rules have changed this year based on the above so maybe i am year late to the party.

If i had said this last year tho.....
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I think the rules have changed this year based on the above so maybe i am year late to the party.

If i had said this last year tho.....
It hasn't changed yet, but AFL are considering it.

The AFL is considering a major rule change for 2026 where
"band one" free agency compensation picks would be forced to fall after pick No. 8 in the draft. This adjustment aims to protect the draft position of bottom-eight clubs and stop high-end picks being pushed back, allowing struggling clubs to secure better talent

IMO AFL should not change rules before the draft, only after periods where clubs have already traded picks.**Unless it benefits Essendon (like Kako)
 
Last edited:
Na they wouldnt give us pick 2. The formula includes player age and zach is already 30
Pretty sure the AFL is also about to change compo to start from pick 8 onwards too.
 
was
First off, i come in peace. Tough times for both our clubs. Trying to rebuild in the current AFL landscape is a joke - you gotta think outside the square to get ahead in this world. So here is a very legal way for Essendon to rig the 2026 AFL draft to maximum advantage.

Zach Merrett clearly wants out. I think Essendon did the right thing standing its ground on him last year, but based on 2026 already, I can't see that playing out the same if/when he tries to push himself out the door again.

So lets devise the plan to make it a win / win for everyone.

Remember "The Veale Deal" ? When Jade Rawlings wanted out & the Dogs traded you Lachlan Veale for pick 6?

Remember when Daniher went to the Lions? Then 12 months later he re-negotiated his contract?

Do both of that with Zach.

Trade a non-required player to the Hawks for their 1st rounder with a mutual understanding tyou will allow Zach to move in the 2026 off-season, a year early.


Then, Re-negotiate his contract so that instead of it expiring in 2027, it ends in 2026. There is no rule against this.

This makes him a free agent at years end. Which then allows you access to a compo pick.

If you finish bottom, you will get pick 2 for him, plus the Hawks first round pick this year as a "Veale Deale"

The AFL let the Lions re-negotiate the Daniher deal, so what rules are you breaking by doing the same to allow Zach to leave? The AFL also allowed the "Bowes" deal between Gold Coast and the Cats, which saw Geelong get Bowes & Pick 7 for a future 3rd round pick.

The Hawks would happily play along, as they only give away one 1st rounder to get Zach, instead of 3. It also allows the club to break ties with Zach in a mutually friendly way, avoid all the drama of trade period. Its clean & everyone has a clear understanding of what is happening. You can even agree then just just sit Zach for the remainder of the year to avoid serious injury, if the Hawks want to add a 2nd round pick to the Veale Deal.

And for you guys, getting pick 2 & 14(is) for Zach is a much better deal than the package you were offered last year, which most likely - will be worse this year.

You can even agree then just just sit Zach for the remainder of the year to avoid serious injury, if the Hawks want to add a 2nd round pick to the Veale Deal.

The system is completely rigged against our clubs, with the AFL happily allowing broken systems to be exploited by the teams which represent their interest. You 2025 draft was a great step in the right direction. Going into this year with possibly pick 1,2 & 14 would be the moment where your club can actually rebuild in the way you need to - from the tippy top.
i Love the out of the box thinking.

But as others have said, I don’t think the rules will allow us to get pick 2.
 
The other example i thought of how this is all legal is when you guys actually did something quite similar

Mal Michael

Was contracted to Lions. Retired. Then un-retired himself and got picked up by you guys in the PSD .

So - the loophole has been there for someone to do the whole time - crazy no one tried it really. Richmond should have done it the year we finished bottom and Bolton wanted to head back to Freo:cry:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom