That answer makes no senseYes, because if Pyke and Co hadn't done what they have and did what the board was whinging about we wouldn't be in the position we are
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That answer makes no senseYes, because if Pyke and Co hadn't done what they have and did what the board was whinging about we wouldn't be in the position we are
correct. 2002 was the last time we won in geelong
correct. 2002 was the last time we won in geelong
That answer makes no sense
Would really like to see Fog have a good game this week. This is his chance to get in the team.
Hopefully Jones plays a ripper tomorrow and can replace Dougie v the Cats (or likely the Showdown).
Who takes second ruck spot if Fogarty replaces Jenkins though?
Have we ever deviated from that structure since Pyke took over? I have a feeling we did it once and Greenwood rucked a bit but can’t recall when.
Would really like to see Fog have a good game this week. This is his chance to get in the team.
Port last beat them there in 2007 in the 2nd to last game before finals in what was a massive confidence boost heading into September.
Lynch will come in for him
"why JJ was Dropped Not enough goals"
Walker goals Round 1-4: 0,1,1,1
Jenkins goals Round 1-4: 0,2,1,1
Lynch goals Round 1-4: 0,1,2,0
So if Jenkins was dropped for not kicking enough goals, why was he dropped before Walker and Lynch? He outscored both of them.
"goals matter"
Walker goals Round 5-9: 3,4,1,2,3
Lynch goals Round 5-9: 1,1,0,3,1
Himmelberg goals Round 5-9: 1,1,1,1,1
Since JJ has left the team, we have seen a spike in performance from Walker and Lynch (see below with almost identical F50 entries), with Himmelberg achieving the same average as Jenkins of 1 goal per game.
I'll give you a hint: It's not all about goals.
"we were not getting the ball into the forward 50"
Inside 50s with Jenkins
Round 1 - 58
Round 2 - 52
Round 3 - 53
Round 4 - 36
Inside 50s without Jenkins
Round 5 - 59
Round 6 - 52
Round 7 - 50
Round 8 - 62
Round 9 - 56
Yes, we were.
No matter how you spin or look at it, we are a better team without Jenkins.
Himmelberg is offering as much on the scoreboard as Jenkins was in the first four rounds.
Himmelberg is younger, hungrier, has a bigger upside and has a longer future at the club.
Forget 2017 where we were a free scoring team with Jenkins a beneficiary.
Forget 2018 where Jenkins had a decent year and did well in the B&F thanks to consistency and not being injured.
This is 2019, and 2017/18 counts for a grand total of zero.
2019-22 however, they count for quite a lot.
Lynch doesnt know how to play "Joe the goose"!!!
And I gave you the reasons why.Pyke and co gave JJ the opportunity to find form the board didn't want to they wanted JJ out forever
The fuq John?
Jenkins even at his best is a bruise free Betsy, this post makes it look like you’ve never seen a game he’s ever played
Really
No matter how you spin or look at it, we are a better team without Jenkins.
Himmelberg is offering as much on the scoreboard as Jenkins was in the first four rounds.
Himmelberg is younger, hungrier, has a bigger upside and has a longer future at the club.
If you are suggesting Fog for JJ, I highly doubt that happens. Himmelberg is the most obvious in. If you bring Fogarty in for Jenkins, who plays the back up ruckman role?Would really like to see Fog have a good game this week. This is his chance to get in the team.
We should have beaten them there during the Neil Craig era (I think 2009?), but from memory James Sellar cost us the game by turning the ball over and Paul Chapman kicked the winning goal.
You might be the one not watching JJ
Jenkins isn’t even fit to shine Dixon’s boots. Galaxies apart
I think we'd break Bigfooty if we dug up all your past posts on Doedee, Burton and J.Scharenberg.
What did you say about Doedee?I said I Id have burton still not backing down from that has been playing well for Port this year would easily be in their top 10 and at KPF height not bad option and home grown talent
Sharenberg would have been better than Jars but he wasn't picked mind you plenty of youngsters aren't, playing well for the bays which is good for my team
If you are suggesting Fog for JJ, I highly doubt that happens. Himmelberg is the most obvious in. If you bring Fogarty in for Jenkins, who plays the back up ruckman role?