- Mar 4, 2015
- 4,113
- 5,062
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Central District
Star player for a Vic club recently fallen from the 8 to make way for a 5th Interstate side and a tough game this week.
Play on.
Play on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Both systems have issues. I actually think outcome based is better as if someone is injured, there is always an outcry anyway and deciding intent off video evidence is hard. Back in the day, they were suspending players for attempted striking and we don't want to go back to that.Weren't people calling for suspensions to be based on action over outcome?
I feel like for the most part, that's what the AFL has done since the Curtis suspension.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I agree, but there is no perfect system.Both systems have issues. I actually think outcome based is better as if someone is injured, there is always an outcry anyway and deciding intent off video evidence is hard. Back in the day, they were suspending players for attempted striking and we don't want to go back to that.
And nobody should miss weeks with a cracked rib and punctured lung either.I agree, but there is no perfect system.
Nobody should be getting suspended for an open palm strike to the chest though, but he plays for my team so I understand how that comes across.
Lynch gate.
Yeah, but he's not the only one.You said he was a cheat who deserved to be whacked.
No one should be suspended for tackling someone either - unless you knock them unconcious.I agree, but there is no perfect system.
Nobody should be getting suspended for an open palm strike to the chest though, but he plays for my team so I understand how that comes across.
Do we move to a system where if something is graded intentional, then it's outcome influenced, whereas if something is a football act, then it's not outcome influenced?No one should be suspended for tackling someone either - unless you knock them unconcious.
Same for open palm strikes to the chest. Once you start puncturing lungs, then it changes things.
By the way, Bas Rutten talks about the power behind open palm strikes from his days back in the Japanese comp. They're nothing to be sneezed at.
Yeah there was a process where if you got cited/fined three times in one season (I think) it was a one week suspensionWas there not a crackdown in sternum punches a few years ago and weren’t players suspended?
That would be common sense, but this is the AFL where common sense has no place unless it fits the agenda.Do we move to a system where if something is graded intentional, then it's outcome influenced, whereas if something is a football act, then it's not outcome influenced?
Right, so they could conceivably crack down on what Darcy did.Yeah there was a process where if you got cited/fined three times in one season (I think) it was a one week suspension
Something like that. I presume that’s still the rule
you compared Darcys push with Lynchs haymaker, very different actionsEither you are suggesting Lynch pushed Butts or you can't read.
Both are equally funny.
which is exactly why he only got 5 weeks. Imagine if he'd connected :0Lolz.
Lynch did not make contact.
you compared Darcys push with Lynchs haymaker, very different actions
Common denominator is obviously Butts. Both incidents were his fault.
Regardless, Darcy should never have smashed him with that baseball bat he had in his sock, in my opinion.Cool. Hopefully one day you'll be able to prove how especially bad Butts is.
Do you mean the Curtis charge straight at cleary? That was hardly a "run down" tackle, it was a head on collision lol
That rule disappeared after 2017.Yeah there was a process where if you got cited/fined three times in one season (I think) it was a one week suspension
Something like that. I presume that’s still the rule
Not that I saw. It seems either it's not worth talking about because it wasn't worthy of suspension, or Darcy/Butts aren't big enough names for it to warrant discussion.Did this come up on any of the shows last nigh? Did not see it on 360.
ThanksYou are thinking of archer. That was a reasonable one.
Curtis’ run down tackle got unreasonable weeks
I agree, but there is no perfect system.
Nobody should be getting suspended for an open palm strike to the chest though, but he plays for my team so I understand how that comes across.