Whatever he gets, they should deduct 3. Carr's been asking for it for years.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not that we don't know how it works. It's that the system has flaws. To get 1 week for that is disgusting.
It's not that we don't know how it works. It's that the system has flaws. To get 1 week for that is disgusting.
How is it flawed? 1st time offenders get off lighter.
If he does it again he'll get a month.
There is nothing absurd about the system.
Why should you get 2 less weeks for it being a first time offence and an early plea? Neither of them change the action which was a dog act, regardless of what jokes you make about Josh Carr.
If that was medium impact, then what on earth would you classify as heavy impact?
If that was medium impact, then what on earth would you classify as heavy impact?
Did the tribunal take into account the elbow-shove on Carr with the ball 25 metres away when he was lying on the ground some 3 minutes before this headbutt?
Watch the video, 30 seconds into the last quarter.
Clearly a pre-meditated headbutt by Brennan - shame on the AFL for not making an example of him.
Apparrently Wikipedia have a thought on it as well
i wonder if cue ball the runner got a please explain from the afl. i reckon cue ball will get his lights punched out one day
A please explain for what?i wonder if cue ball the runner got a please explain from the afl.
A please explain for what?
Yep, and I enjoyed it as much as the next Port supporter.didnt you see the bald nut carry on.
You people still have no idea how the tribunal system works clearly.
PowerForGood; said:Clearly a pre-meditated headbutt by Brennan.