How to Pay off your mortgage this week

[Roby]

Isn't Foley going to be back this week? I don't normally bet, but this week I will, and it will be on Richmond on the line.

This is a different Richmond team the Swans are facing. Not too mention that Richmond had a week off. Richmond for me.

 

[Doug Hogan]

Isn't Foley going to be back this week? I don't normally bet, but this week I will, and it will be on Richmond on the line.

This is a different Richmond team the Swans are facing. Not too mention that Richmond had a week off. Richmond for me.

Yeh, the week off worked a treat for the young Melbourne side who are , accordingly to most on here, more advanced than Richmond. The week off is one of the key reasons I am so confident-they have had two weeks to feel pretty good about themsleves! Foley hasn't played for six weeks.

Swans by plenty and Richmond continue to be their bitch!!

 

[Roby]

Yeh, the week off worked a treat for the young Melbourne side who are , accordingly to most on here, more advanced than Richmond. The week off is one of the key reasons I am so confident-they have had two weeks to feel pretty good about themsleves! Foley hasn't played for six weeks.

Swans by plenty and Richmond continue to be their bitch!!

Yep, Adelaide also had a week off, your theory holds no water. I'll wonder if you will come back and post on this thread next week when I re-quote you.

 

[coasting]

Going by Paul Roos ranting and raving performance last week I would say he has lost the players. He is already gone in their eyes. I wouldn't be putting any money on the Swans.

 

[Barnzy]

Oh look, it's Sausage Roll.

 

[Simon Templar]

I wouldn't back the swans against anyone atm even with someone ele's money... maybe against West Coast away from Subi

 

[KardiniaPark]

$4.80 to win by 40+ is good odds on Sportsbet.

Have the swans ever won a game by more than 40?

 

[Fritzorro]

Port Adelaide v Sydney Swans
7:10pm Sat Jun 12 2010 AS


Q1 3.2 4.2
Q2 6.2 10.4
Q3 8.5 11.6
Q4 8.7 14.9

55 ---- 93

 

[Philth]

Thanks for the advice. I thought it might have been lights out in the caravan park by now but obviously not

Given the tigers have won three out of four and are only 2.20, I wouldn't have thought it was that obvious, trailer boy and the odds back me up.

I have had $25000 on the Swans at 1.90, which won't quite clear the mortgage but it will make a dent.

You are either -

a. bullshitting us
b. stinking rich, or
c. just plain stupid.

Richmond have every chance of winning this match. Yes i know the Swans have owned us for a long time, but no way would I be betting on them this weekend.

 

[Simon Templar]

You are either -

a. bullshitting us
b. stinking rich, or
c. just plain stupid.

Richmond have every chance of winning this match. Yes i know the Swans have owned us for a long time, but no way would I be betting on them this weekend.

I pick option c.

 

[Philth]

I pick option c.

Yeah, that seems most likely...although i do smell "bullshit" in this thread

 

[Catsace]

Sydney still have a lot of people fooled by their successes of 2005-06 when it comes to their form of recent years. Since 2006, Sydney have gone 1-7 against Geelong, 0-9 against Collingwood, 2-6 against St.Kilda. 2-5 against the Bulldogs and even just 1-4 against Adelaide. Yes they have gorged themselves on sides like Richmond, Carlton and so over the last few years, but they simply do not win out of turn (or even in turn) against the better sides.

Richmond now are a different beast to the pilloried unit they were before their recent little run started. They do play a pretty good style of footy, and are not afraid to take the game on, as they are young and their coach has given them belief. Sydney seem somewhat fragile in that once a side gets on top of them it's all over red rover. Yes they sit 7-6 so far on the table, but to my reckoning they are the side most likely top drop out of the 8.....but for the fact that nobody outside, and i do include North, the only challenger within a bulls roar at the minute, also lack the maturity and power to make finals.

Put it this way, it's a tough way to make a killing, in retrospect St.Kilda, a side that had won 31/37 playing Geelong without three super smalls in Corey, Chappy and Kelly, and with Scarlett and Mooney 1st up from injury, looked magical value at $3.38. Of course, i never took those odds, i can't talk but looking back you will never see the Saints at anything like those figures for years to come i'd suggest. Your 25K would have become over 80K and yes, you could make big bucks there.

 

[Hodgepodge]

I live in a skip.

Richmond by 28.

 

[KardiniaPark]

Port Adelaide v Sydney Swans
7:10pm Sat Jun 12 2010 AS


Q1 3.2 4.2
Q2 6.2 10.4
Q3 8.5 11.6
Q4 8.7 14.9

55 ---- 93

How is that more than 40!.

 

[jko'neal]

If Sydney trail at all during this match. Roosey won't take out an A4 picture at the break, he will take the Laptop onto the ground and ram it up someone's behind

 

[Fritzorro]

Port Adelaide v Sydney Swans
7:10pm Sat Jun 12 2010 AS


Q1 3.2 4.2
Q2 6.2 10.4
Q3 8.5 11.6
Q4 8.7 14.9

How is that more than 40!.

55 ---- 93 + 3 = 41

Yeah, not forty, but a pretty solid win.

Port = Richmond.

 

[Majinbuu]

$10 on the swans H2H

 

[CatDog29]

Go the Tigers, never believed I would ever be wanting Richmond to win - but its a Karma thing and the tide has turned for the long term. I do actually think Richmond will win this one.

 

[kosifantutti]

Well, if, that, is, true, flog, then, shouldn't they be say 1.30 or even, shorter, if, MOST, think they, will, win,,,,,,,?

If 400,000 people have an opinion on this game and 200,001 think the Swans will win, that would be most but it wouldn't justify odds of $1.30

 

[Damon_3388]

Absolute morals to win?

wat.

I undestand what the saying means ("a moral to win" - "a certainty to win"), but I've never understood its origin. Just seems like one of those made up catchphrases/alternate uses of words that somehow caught on.

 

[tigerfan1961]

Eat em alive Tigers!

Yep, until that comment I thought, yeh, maybe. But now, go Tiges, hope we cost that sucker a lazy $25G

 

[Brown Bottle]

Are you trying to win back all the money that you put on us to go through the season without a win? It's very rare for me to wish a loss on a punter, but I hope you do your dough, and do it well.

We're not the same team that went to Sydney in R3, and Sydney aren't sending the same team to Melbourne either. They might beat us, but then Port, West Coast and Brisbane all seemed to think they would as well.

Love your use of Bold, by the way.

 

[Doug Hogan]

Are you trying to win back all the money that you put on us to go through the season without a win? It's very rare for me to wish a loss on a punter, but I hope you do your dough, and do it well.

We're not the same team that went to Sydney in R3, and Sydney aren't sending the same team to Melbourne either. They might beat us, but then Port, West Coast and Brisbane all seemed to think they would as well.

Love your use of Bold, by the way.

Thanks.

I can't quite work out why so many are wishing me ill with my bet?

I thought I had made a reasonable case why the Swans are morals but I have had nothing but grief!!

Go Swannies!!

 

[Shane Hird]

Doug.

You're insane.

Seek help.

 

[Doug Hogan]

Ohh, I fogot to mention it is Ryan O'keffes 200th game!!

Also, Goodes has been beaten up all week in the media...just watch him rip the tigers apart.

Two more factors the Tigers didn't need but will help me get over the line with my bet!

Just get on guys while you can!