Remove this Banner Ad

Hutchy on SEN

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Let us not escape from the fact that this so-called 'journalist' Craig Hutchison exacerbated the issue by coaxing the answers from Libba. I'm not saying Libba is blameless, by all means what he said was pure crap and should suffer the consequences, but Hutchison who god knows why has a job, again proved he is the prime instigator of contrived crap. He couldn't substantiate his claims with honest facts (I refer to his claim that Jamieson is "not on the Blues list this year) and ultimately, he is such a twerp. I always hoped Carey would belt him on air during Footy Classified, and his stories on the Footy Show really showed us how much of a journalist he is - breaking the news that Steve Johnson's father was involved in an altercation at a VFL match. Clap Clap Clap Craig Hutchison -- how you have a job and better would-be journalists and writers are without one, is a mystery.
 
I wonder if Liberatore realises what he has done here, and I don't mean against Carlton who can look after themselves. Libba has been made to look like a fool, an indecisive, perhaps simple, fool, and no one would again employ him to be an AC at AFL level on the basis that he can't keep his mouth shut after the fact.

Makes him look pretty poor IMHO.
 
but Hutchison who god knows why has a job, again proved he is the prime instigator of contrived crap. He couldn't substantiate his claims with honest facts (I refer to his claim that Jamieson is "not on the Blues list this year) and ultimately, he is such a twerp

Hutchy didn't say that Jamison had been de-listed (which would have better suited his sensationalist style) what he said was that Jamison is 'not on the Blues' list', and Jamison is in fact not on the Blues' senior list, he's on the rookie list.

Hutchy (although spot on with his facts) deliberately structured his words to misrepresent those facts so that the average viewer would think he had said the opposite, but if ever it came back to bite him, he had himself covered.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Hutchy didn't say that Jamison had been de-listed (which would have better suited his sensationalist style) what he said was that Jamison is 'not on the Blues' list', and Jamison is in fact not on the Blues' senior list, he's on the rookie list.

Hutchy (although spot on with his facts) deliberately structured his words to misrepresent those facts so that the average viewer would think he had said the opposite, but if ever it came back to bite him, he had himself covered.
Does our "list" not cover rookies?
IMO he just ****ed up.;)
 
Hutchy didn't say that Jamison had been de-listed (which would have better suited his sensationalist style) what he said was that Jamison is 'not on the Blues' list', and Jamison is in fact not on the Blues' senior list, he's on the rookie list.

Hutchy (although spot on with his facts) deliberately structured his words to misrepresent those facts so that the average viewer would think he had said the opposite, but if ever it came back to bite him, he had himself covered.

yeah yeah yeah whatever...

im more interested in your avatar... care to fill us all in...

also if you go to www.photobucket.com you can upload it there and post it in is full size... go on for the pleasure of all male carlton supporters on BF :D:p
 
Does our "list" not cover rookies?
IMO he just ****ed up.;)

Possibly, but I read into his using the words 'not on the Blues' list' instead of 'no longer on the Blues' list' or 'has been delisted', which would have given more impact to the statement.

It's either one of two possibilities:
  1. He's a dumbf*ck who didn't do his homework properly and got his facts wrong.
  2. He was well aware of the situation and manipulated it to 'create' another 'fact' to support the view that Carlton was tanking.
 
Possibly, but I read into his using the words 'not on the Blues' list' instead of 'no longer on the Blues' list' or 'has been delisted', which would have given more impact to the statement.

It's either one of two possibilities:
  1. He's a dumbf*ck who didn't do his homework properly and got his facts wrong.
  2. He was well aware of the situation and manipulated it to 'create' another 'fact' to support the view that Carlton was tanking.
If hutchy said "list" generally, then hed be wrong.
If he said "seniour list" then he manipulated it well
 
Possibly, but I read into his using the words 'not on the Blues' list' instead of 'no longer on the Blues' list' or 'has been delisted', which would have given more impact to the statement.

It's either one of two possibilities:
  1. He's a dumbf*ck who didn't do his homework properly and got his facts wrong.
  2. He was well aware of the situation and manipulated it to 'create' another 'fact' to support the view that Carlton was tanking.

I suspect he knew what he was saying, and his point is we played a kid who we didn't even opt to promote from our rookie list this year.....it is a manipulation of the facts that will sound like it is supporting his fabrications to most uneducated listeners, he's a sly dog that hutchy.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I suspect he knew what he was saying, and his point is we played a kid who we didn't even opt to promote from our rookie list this year.....it is a manipulation of the facts that will sound like it is supporting his fabrications to most uneducated listeners, he's a sly dog that hutchy.

Thanks for seeing my point instead of attacking me for allegedly defending Hutchy (was getting a lot of that on Friday).
 
Thanks for seeing my point instead of attacking me for allegedly defending Hutchy (was getting a lot of that on Friday).



Half right

I said I was so
I said I was sor
I apolo
Ah forget about it..........
 
I suspect he knew what he was saying, and his point is we played a kid who we didn't even opt to promote from our rookie list this year.....it is a manipulation of the facts that will sound like it is supporting his fabrications to most uneducated listeners, he's a sly dog that hutchy.

Hutchy misses out on the key point with the Jamieson list situation, either because he is an inept journo or he manipulated the facts to suit his argument. Me think it was a little bit of both.

Jammo was an elevated rookie late in 2007. He showed promise and potential in his games and rightly was retained by the club for 2008.

The club had one of two choices:

(1) Promote Jamieson to the senior list, thereby costing us a lot more $$ under the salary cap

OR

(2) Leave Jamieson on the rookie list thereby saving a lot $$ compared to elevating him to the senior list. The main reason for doing this is because we do not have a Veteran list player for 2008, we are allowed to have a "Nominated Rookie". Basically this means, Jamieson is a rookie listed player that can enjoy all the benefits of a senior listed player without the price tag. He does not require a player to be placed on the long term injury list in order to get a game, so providing he is fit and his form holds there is no reason he can't play all 22 games.

To me it's a no brainer. Yet somehow Hutchy can't grasp this simple concept.

Great list management by the club in my book.

It also de-bunks yet another bull $h1t tanking theory.
 
Actually Johnny at the end of the day Jammo was kept on the rookie list to keep a spot open on the senior list for the pre-season draft.

So in actual fact it costs us more, by having the additional player. Pfeiffer is his name..........or is it Pfieffer..........."i" before "e" except after "c".......ah who cares.:eek::thumbsu:
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Actually Johnny at the end of the day Jammo was kept on the rookie list to keep a spot open on the senior list for the pre-season draft.

So in actual fact it costs us more, by having the additional player. Pfeiffer is his name..........or is it Pfieffer..........."i" before "e" except after "c".......ah who cares.:eek::thumbsu:
Not sure about that. We wanted a full 38 players but the nominated rookie situation was too good to miss out on. Basically we can play two nominated rookies all year in place of two veterans. Jamison is a given and we have one more spot for whoever put their hand up, with Ellard and Jacobs the chances at this stage. How much would Pfeiffer be on compared to Jamison? Probably around the same if Jamison was a listed player.

We would have had no Pfeiffer, Jamison on the senior list unnecessarily and our nominated rookies would not have been as good as Pfeiffer, therefore weakening out list marginally. I think the Blues knew exactly what they were doing with Jamo.
 
i'm the girl in the pic

Hi Jessi and welcome. I have taken the liberty of removing all offensive material relating to the picture. You know what they say ... it is all fun and games until the missus shows up!

Now that we know you are indeed a real person, on BigFooty, AND not at all happy about the byplay between the boys, the right thing to do is to remove it all and start again.

It is hard to know what is fair game between posters who generally engage in a lot of playful banter at the best of times.

Let's hope you stick around long enough to dish up all the dirt on Yoss. ;):)
 
Hi Jessi,

Heartfelt apologies If I caused any offense.... Yoss and I have frequently engaged in friendly banter on here, so it was all meant in jest and nobody was supposed to be offended....I can assure you I am a true gentleman in person :thumbsu:
 
Hi Jessi and welcome. I have taken the liberty of removing all offensive material relating to the picture. You know what they say ... it is all fun and games until the missus shows up!

Now that we know you are indeed a real person, on BigFooty, AND not at all happy about the byplay between the boys, the right thing to do is to remove it all and start again.

It is hard to know what is fair game between posters who generally engage in a lot of playful banter at the best of times.

Let's hope you stick around long enough to dish up all the dirt on Yoss. ;):)

Any chance you could PM me the original post that you removed, been in meetings all day and looks like I missed all the action :(
 
Hi Jessi,

Heartfelt apologies If I caused any offense.... Yoss and I have frequently engaged in friendly banter on here, so it was all meant in jest and nobody was supposed to be offended....I can assure you I am a true gentleman in person :thumbsu:

God you're a suck.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hutchy on SEN

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top