hypocracy of christianity

[MonkeyButterer]

Anyone can see from what monkeybutterer, otaku and appleyard have recently posted that they have a need to play the man when it comes to that other thread. Which of course means that they do not and did not have winning arguments when it came to a portrayal of a natural occurring three dimensions meaning all of god believing, agnosticism and traditional atheism are unsound points of view.

I do it 'cause its fun - and because you are seemingly incapable of having a reasoned argument, on that or any other topic - but *mostly* because its fun.

 

[otaku]

Gee you make errors dude. If I am the geometrician I may or may not be referring to myself in the third person in the recent comments placed in brackets at the end of posts. What follows is what you quoted above your post. Have a read of it.

gee, who was talking about this post?? Man, you make some assumptions dude - one reason why your "theories" sucked so much arse.

Heaps of use of third person there you pathetic agnostic wancer. Go back through the thread. You will only find in recent closing brackets the third person. The reason behind this I will explain for you and anyone who is just reading thread for the first time.

yet again - running off on a tangent. You aint a smart fellah is ya NET?

The other read referred to was a statement about the three dimensions being naturally occurring and thus not being nothing. Therefore there is no need to invoke theories of supernatural creation.
It’s origin was actually this thread, as the starter of this thread wrongly labelled me a god fearing christian with his first post. Along that thread it was stated several times that the simple motive of the thread was a little more than that. It was the ridiculousness in a belief in god if there is a simple answer to why something exists. There is enough middle east threads on this forum to make that something simple enough to understand.

blah blah blah - yadda yadda yadda.

By the time we move along well along this thread you start to find those saying they are agnostically inclined do nothing more than seeking a rise out of "god fearing christians". So I started calling them weak and this drew reference to that other thread.

no, actually you will find they are arguing points in the bible. The only one seeking a rise is you - and with good reason, you viagra chewing slimebucket.

Anyone can see from what monkeybutterer, otaku and appleyard have recently posted that they have a need to play the man when it comes to that other thread.

no, there is no "need", only desire. BTW, whats a wancer, you f*cking hypocrite?

Which of course means that they do not and did not have winning arguments when it came to a portrayal of a natural occurring three dimensions meaning all of god believing, agnosticism and traditional atheism are unsound points of view.

Actually, it come from wanting to insult you, you cretinous lump of shyte. Your "arguments" consisted of nothing more than "I said so, therefore i am correct". Your "science" was nothing more than the musings of a *ed sloth.

Why should we even deign to aanswer your pathetic little meanderings?

With respect of this thread the point is agnostics and (atheists who simply don't believe in god without some other logic of why the universe exists) are just as big a hypocrites as god fearing christians. Probably bigger.

No, actually agnostics are probably the only people who take in consideration what we do and dont know. Unlike assmonkeys like yourself.

Anyway post what you like about this particlar post, I'll bow out of this thread from here. It's been a pointless affair for quite some time.

Yes, it is time you left. You have had nothing to contribute for ages. Dont even know why you bother posting, to be honest.

 

[otaku]

so NET, will you just continue to send me abusive PMs, or will you actually *try* to explain your way out of this one, you ignorant terdburglar

 

[teams]

so NET, will you just continue to send me abusive PMs, or will you actually *try* to explain your way out of this one, you ignorant terdburglar

Oh dear. Full list of PM exchanges between you and I.

Originally Posted by notenoughteams
Top class post. Well done. Agnostics carrying on as if they know something when the basis of their position is one one of not knowing is hypocritical. You fit this category. Pointed this out to Bunsen. You should have pick it up back then when he came to an end instead of making a fool of your self.

regards

NET

Originally posted by Otaku Cant handle getting your arse handed to you anymore eh? wise choice. Show me where i have ever stated that I know what is going on - i have argued a point on many occasions - such as the resurrection not being valid based on what we know. Never have i said it could never have happened.

Now, why dont you just f*ck off back to your little hole and hide for a while.

Originally posted by notenoughteans. That's the point. If you don't know what is going on and neither you or anyone else was able to show that the three dimensions aren't naturally occurring, you couldn't honestly discount out of hand that the reason of everything is not the natural occurrence of the three dimensions. Savvy.

As far as the myth of a resurrection goes, wouldn't the logical question to ask or answer be how was rigor mortis over come. Didn't notice you addressing this question, clownhead.

You are a smallfry intellect otto. If you are going to show someone else is wrong, the implication is you are more right than they. Your more right is what? Agnosticism. What is agnosticism. "I don't know". Duh. You are not only little. You are to gutless to face the world without the cructh of the possibilty of there being a god. When you have the courage to face the world without your god crutch you can get back to me. For some one like me who knows that there is no god, you're just a waste of time and space.

The last one from you is a blank evidently. Said my wish was to bow out of this thread, otto. What do you want explained. Which of the 2 PM's did you find abusive. If pressed I could have found yours so. The bottom line is you are nothing on this thread without an airy fairy notion of a maybe god as your crutch. To many agnostics not cognizant of their hypocrisy to make this thread worth anyone's time.

 

[skipper kelly]

What a wonderful and well moderated thread.

 

[Pornstar]

People choose to believe in God predominantly due to their fear of their own mortality. If there is a God, then there is also heaven. If there is heaven, then they have an after life, and hey presto! - instant immortality, yay!! Of course, there is the minority that choose to believe in God because becoming a priest provides opportunities to molest children.

The thing that really cracks me up about society and religion is if you believe in God nobody blinks an eyelid. But if you believe in vampires or werewolves everyone considers you either a bit insane or a bit simple.Yet there is no proof that either God or vampires exist.

I have a question about the bible. Who actually wrote it?

 

[skipper kelly]

People choose to believe in God predominantly due to their fear of their own mortality. If there is a God, then there is also heaven. If there is heaven, then they have an after life, and hey presto! - instant immortality, yay!! Of course, there is the minority that choose to believe in God because becoming a priest provides opportunities to molest children.

The thing that really cracks me up about society and religion is if you believe in God nobody blinks an eyelid. But if you believe in vampires or werewolves everyone considers you either a bit insane or a bit simple.Yet there is no proof that either God or vampires exist.

I have a question about the bible. Who actually wrote it?

Brilliant man.

 

[otaku]

The last one from you is a blank evidently. Said my wish was to bow out of this thread, otto. What do you want explained. Which of the 2 PM's did you find abusive. If pressed I could have found yours so. The bottom line is you are nothing on this thread without an airy fairy notion of a maybe god as your crutch. To many agnostics not cognizant of their hypocrisy to make this thread worth anyone's time.

And why did you want to bow out? because you know your whole argument was bollocks.

Yet again, you were the one who stated the complaint of being called a god fearing christian. Yet you continually do the same to other people, incorrctly mislabeling them. I called you out as being a hypocrite, and you run away.

No surprises really. Your arguments on this thread and the god is folklore thread sucked monkeys balls, and you know it.

What i want explained is why you think the way you do? Is it you are just a confused godbotherer? are you mentally handicapped? Or are you just a tosser of the highest order?

The hypocrisy is all yours NET. You fail to recognise the god theory is equally as valid as yours. Especially when you cannot prove any main points of your theory. Your faults are pointed out, and then you run away. Then you start sending me PMs trying to continue the argument. Now, why would you do that?

 

[skipper kelly]

Otaku. Without getting involved in your discussion, can you just explain to me what a godbotherer is? Thanks

 

[otaku]

thought it was self explanatory - a person who bothers a god is a godbotherer

 

[teams]

And why . Then you start sending me PMs trying to continue the argument. Now, why would you do that?

Rubbish. Sent you a PM as a personal reply to post 1302. Which was yours.

gee, who was talking about this post?? Man, you make some assumptions dude - one reason why your "theories" sucked so much arse.


yet again - running off on a tangent. You aint a smart fellah is ya NET?

blah blah blah - yadda yadda yadda.

no, actually you will find they are arguing points in the bible. The only one seeking a rise is you - and with good reason, you viagra chewing slimebucket.

no, there is no "need", only desire. BTW, whats a wancer, you f*cking hypocrite?

No, actually agnostics are probably the only people who take in consideration what we do and dont know. Unlike assmonkeys like yourself.

Yes, it is time you left. You have had nothing to contribute for ages. Dont even know why you bother posting, to be honest.

Finished the PM with regards. No antagonism. You replied with antagonism. I replied in a way that exposed your internal hypocrisy to your self. You couldn't handle the fact they you use notions of god as a crutch and posted this on this thread to try an lamely win your self back inside your self.

so NET, will you just continue to send me abusive PMs, or will you actually *try* to explain your way out of this one, you ignorant terdburglar

Getting to be a bit of a soap opera, isn't it. The bottom line is you are a gutless as any other agnostic. Why don't you send me another abusive PM. Might make you feel better.

 

[Portia]

The thing that really cracks me up about society and religion is if you believe in God nobody blinks an eyelid.

Yeah, I dunno about that...I get very uncomfortable around people that are actual practicing Christians. Its strange and foreign.

 

[otaku]

Rubbish. Sent you a PM as a personal reply to post 1302. Which was yours.

as i said - you were simply trying to prolong the argument via PM. WHy? Cause you knew you were getting your arse handed to you out here?

Finished the PM with regards. No antagonism. You replied with antagonism.
I replied in a way that exposed your internal hypocrisy to your self. You couldn't handle the fact they you use notions of god as a crutch and posted this on this thread to try an lamely win your self back inside your self.

whats this crutch business? I dont believe in a god - but I am smart enough to know that that is all it is. A belief. You, on the other hand, have as much conviction that there is no god as any fundie believes there IS a god.

You are the one who is deluding themselves here.

Getting to be a bit of a soap opera, isn't it. The bottom line is you are a gutless as any other agnostic. Why don't you send me another abusive PM. Might make you feel better.

Gutless? Again, you lack of logic is astounding.

You have had your theories torn down. There is no two ways about it. How does being an agnostic make me gutless? Because I can see the fundemental uncertainties we deal with, that makes me gutless? Strange way of looking at that NET.

Seems to me, anyone who bases their life on a certainty, rather than facing the fact that we dont know, is the one who lacks courage.

 

[otaku]

BTW NET, how long ago did you read "The Final Theory" by Mark McCutcheon?

 

[teams]

otto have never read the aforementioned book. The nonsense of your previous post was well covered in that other thread. If you want a response, you can have one but there isn't much point if you couldn't understand it back then. Can't really be bothered with someone not prepared to differentiate between the supernatural and the natural. You're wrong about the personal messaging to.

 

[MonkeyButterer]

otto have never read the aforementioned book. The nonsense of your previous post was well covered in that other thread. If you want a response, you can have one but there isn't much point if you couldn't understand it back then. Can't really be bothered with someone not prepared to differentiate between the supernatural and the natural. You're wrong about the personal messaging to.

You, NET, are a f*cking liar. The bollocks you dribble comes verbatim from the arse-load of bollocks McCutcheon peddles in The Final Theory, and his ability to ignore observational evidence and gloss over the fundamental flaws in his theory mirror your own. His rants, both in the book and in published online conversations about problems in his theory stemming from the Newtonian brainwashing we've all suffered, are echoed in your mumblings on this and that other thread.

Considering your vitriol against those who either believe (in God, the bible, or what have you), or admit to not know (the "pathetic agnostics" you rail against), your own blind acceptance of this charlatan's snake-oil is mind-boggling. You are no atheist, you've just found another prophet.

Tosser.

 

[funkyfreo]

Otaku. Without getting involved in your discussion, can you just explain to me what a godbotherer is? Thanks

I always thought a Godbotherer was someone who uses their God to bother other people.

 

[otaku]

otto have never read the aforementioned book. The nonsense of your previous post was well covered in that other thread. If you want a response, you can have one but there isn't much point if you couldn't understand it back then. Can't really be bothered with someone not prepared to differentiate between the supernatural and the natural. You're wrong about the personal messaging to.

when you are talking about god, obviously you have to consider the supernatural.

For instance rigor mortis - the thing you bleat about re the resurrection:

If you considered the resurrection to be a wholly natural event, than this would be a consideration - but if it is supernatural (as is believed by christians) then obviously someone who could raise the dead could deal with rigor.

Now, obviously i can differentiate between supernatural and natural. You on the other hand claim some bollocksy nonsense about If something is natural, then that means that there can be no supernatural.

Obviously that logic is so flawed, it isnt funny.

Yet you continue to blather away, believing every word of your mentor, and yet have no real idea of what you are talking about, so you?

 

[teams]

You, NET, are a f*cking liar. The bollocks you dribble comes verbatim from the arse-load of bollocks McCutcheon peddles in The Final Theory, and his ability to ignore observational evidence and gloss over the fundamental flaws in his theory mirror your own. His rants, both in the book and in published online conversations about problems in his theory stemming from the Newtonian brainwashing we've all suffered, are echoed in your mumblings on this and that other thread.

Considering your vitriol against those who either believe (in God, the bible, or what have you), or admit to not know (the "pathetic agnostics" you rail against), your own blind acceptance of this charlatan's snake-oil is mind-boggling. You are no atheist, you've just found another prophet.

Tosser.

Sorry MB. Never read it. When otto mentioned it, did a google to find out what it was. Never said I was an aethist either. Aethists base there lives on not believing in something. Not my cup of tea. Would think it was negative styled agnostics that have drawn vitriol from me in the main. Perhaps god believers a bit. (The thing that interested me was otto suspecting that I could actually read a book. His opinion of me is usually vastly different to possessing that sort of capacity.)

 

[teams]

when you are talking about god, obviously you have to consider the supernatural.

For instance rigor mortis - the thing you bleat about re the resurrection:

If you considered the resurrection to be a wholly natural event, than this would be a consideration - but if it is supernatural (as is believed by christians) then obviously someone who could raise the dead could deal with rigor.

Now, obviously i can differentiate between supernatural and natural. You on the other hand claim some bollocksy nonsense about If something is natural, then that means that there can be no supernatural.

Obviously that logic is so flawed, it isnt funny.

Yet you continue to blather away, believing every word of your mentor, and yet have no real idea of what you are talking about, so you?

You are just going to have to do better than this otto, to warrant a reply.

 

[otaku]

You are just going to have to do better than this otto, to warrant a reply.

i think you just did

 

[skipper kelly]

I know you cant believe everything you read on the net but.....

 

[purplesoul]

Well done on stuffing this thread up NET. There was actually some interesting discussion throughout until you started.

 

[teams]

i think you just did

Good point for once otto. Thought of that just as I clicked.

 

[Bentleigh]

Well done on stuffing this thread up NET. There was actually some interesting discussion throughout until you started.

Keep going lads.

Good reading.