Society/Culture Hypocrisy of The Left - part 3

[TimmeT]

Why do they do this?

This week we had another example of left aligned people attack assault and also harass people who did nt conform with nor agree with their views at the conference for the minerals council.

Supporters of the protest used statements to justify their actions such as defending against the climate criminals and using positions such as the police went after them first for their right to assault them. This was while they were blocking people persistently using their bodies or with force and shoving and spitting on those trying to get in.

Examples of this are shown below





Yet we consistenty hear the same people whinge repeatedly regarding the fact that the government isn't tolerant of others, whinges about war like Johnny and Iraq and seeks to marginalise and attack people for certain positions they possess and yet here were are with these same people harassing and attacking people under the same reasoning as they berate and accost the government fgor.

The question I have is why does the left take the moral highground on being good citizens and yet constantly contradicts itself particularly when it comes to being violent. Several protests that the left has engaged particularly in Melbourne recently have become violent due to their beliefs and nothing else. Why can't the left practice the tolerance that they pride themselves on when it comes to protesting

 

[Bradesmaen]

When will you stop dividing everything into left and right? People who are considered right also protest at such events.

 

[TimmeT]

When will you stop dividing everything into left and right? People who are considered right also protest at such events.

Was highly appropriate to divide into left and right. Maybe if you actually attempted to watch the video you would have notice where Bolt decided to outline the clearly socialist and far left ideas of the person being interviewed and also a number of other individuals and groups involved in this protest coordination.

 

[Bradesmaen]

Was highly appropriate to divide into left and right. Maybe if you actually attempted to watch the video you would have notice where Bolt decided to outline the clearly socialist and far left ideas of the person being interviewed and also a number of other individuals and groups involved in this protest coordination.

I will never watch Andrew Bolt for anything because he is inherently biased. Again, people don't have to be left or right to support climate change protesting. No one would call Noam Chomsky left yet he is a supporter of Extinction Rebellion.

You and your mates are continuously trying to divide people deliberately with language like left and right. When far right protestors (aka people protesting against non-white people and wearing swastikas) do anything you never say a peep. Completely divisive language made at specific people.

 

[TimmeT]

I will never watch Andrew Bolt for anything because he is inherently biased. Again, people don't have to be left or right to support climate change protesting. No one would call Noam Chomsky left yet he is a supporter of Extinction Rebellion.

You and your mates are continuously trying to divide people deliberately with language like left and right. When far right protestors (aka people protesting against non-white people and wearing swastikas) do anything you never say a peep. Completely divisive language made at specific people.

Don't need to be right or left to be anti migration either. Don't think anyone considers mette fredricksen to be right wing but she supports anti immigration policies. Also I have stated multiple times I don'ty support actions of whackhoes like Erikson.

Trust that you have come out with an excuse as to why you won't watch the video and haven't done so even though it demonstratesd the very thing you are claiming I am apprently wrong about. I thought you were only committed to truth and accuracy as per your comment in the Sudanese Gang thread. It seems that was an untruth as you have managed to tell more than one lie in here while wanting tpo justify ignoring the facts from the clip

 

[Rusty Brookes]

I'm sorry but the moment you're bringing Andrew Bolt in as expert witness, your argument is pretty much shot.

Here's a mind blowing thought. I can agree with the ideas behind something like Extinction Rebellion and disagree with the methods they employ. Don't extrapolate the actions of a minority and apply it to the majority.

 

[Taylor]

If words are violent and violence is not only bad but must be met with violence then ideas spoken can be met with violence.

Why? Because it's the easiest thing to do. You know you've won the argument when they have run out of their own and resorted to violence to stop you speaking yours further.

 

[TimmeT]

I'm sorry but the moment you're bringing Andrew Bolt in as expert witness, your argument is pretty much shot.

Here's a mind blowing thought. I can agree with the ideas behind something like Extinction Rebellion and disagree with the methods they employ. Don't extrapolate the actions of a minority and apply it to the majority.

I'm sorry but the moment you decide to dismiss something said because it is from person x who I don't agree with without even bothering to demonstrate what was factually wrong about them your argument is pretty much shot. So like to show me where Bolt's been wrong by commenting on and highlighting the fact that these protests were left wing in nature and propagated by left wing wntities.

 

[Bradesmaen]

Don't need to be right or left to be anti migration either. Don't think anyone considers mette fredricksen to be right wing but she supports anti immigration policies. Also I have stated multiple times I don'ty support actions of whackhoes like Erikson.

Trust that you have come out with an excuse as to why you won't watch the video and haven't done so even though it demonstratesd the very thing you are claiming I am apprently wrong about. I thought you were only committed to truth and accuracy as per your comment in the Sudanese Gang thread. It seems that was an untruth as you have managed to tell more than one lie in here while wanting tpo justify ignoring the facts from the clip

When did I ever say you supported the actions of a moron like Erikson?

I don't excuse their behaviour and none of my posts will show that. I simply said stop being deliberately divisive with your language of Left v Right. This world is not Left v Right, or at least it shouldn't be but it is now. Honestly, you are one of the worst posters on this forum for that, instantly something happens "LEFTIES!!!!". Division does nothing but harm all of us.

 

[Rusty Brookes]

I'm sorry but the moment you decide to dismiss something said because it is from person x who I don't agree with without even bothering to demonstrate what was factually wrong about them your argument is pretty much shot. So like to show me where Bolt's been wrong by commenting on and highlighting the fact that these protests were left wing in nature and propagated by left wing wntities.

I didn't deny that the protesters were left-wing. What I object to is the insinuation, that their behaviour (or indeed their views) reflect the left as a whole which was the gist of your post. It would be like me saying the Ku Klux Klan reflects the views of anyone that considers themselves even mildly conservative.

 

[TimmeT]

When did I ever say you supported the actions of a moron like Erikson?

I don't excuse their behaviour and none of my posts will show that. I simply said stop being deliberately divisive with your language of Left v Right. This world is not Left v Right, or at least it shouldn't be but it is now. Honestly, you are one of the worst posters on this forum for that, instantly something happens "LEFTIES!!!!". Division does nothing but harm all of us.

In the post below and note the fact that I said like Erikson who is a well known protestor of far right views who has been discussed many times on this board. Note the word like means as an example and he fits perfectly into the type of person you are referring to.

You and your mates are continuously trying to divide people deliberately with language like left and right. When far right protestors (aka people protesting against non-white people and wearing swastikas) do anything you never say a peep. Completely divisive language made at specific people.

Absolutely laughable that you'd call anyone else divisive for using language which is as much. You have no problems with calling people wacists as an example as soon as they make comments about non whites (such as by quoting stories on them which are truth)and yet you provide no support for your claims because it is extremely evident that all you want to do is attack and divide people. You should go meet the kettle you utter hypocrite.

 

[Bradesmaen]

In the post below and note the fact that I said like Erikson who is a well known protestor of far right views who has been discussed many times on this board. Note the word like means as an example and he fits perfectly into the type of person you are referring to.

How is saying that you use divisive language saying you're a white supremacist/racist like Eriskon? Seriously I would like to know how you managed to reach that conclusion because it's one giant leap for man kind.

Absolutely laughable that you'd call anyone else divisive for using language which is as much. You have no problems with calling people wacists as an example as soon as they make comments about non whites (such as by quoting stories on them which are truth)and yet you provide no support for your claims because it is extremely evident that all you want to do is attack and divide people. You should go meet the kettle you utter hypocrite.

I don't really call many people racist and the people I do are patently and obviously racist like Stewies Power. I will call out people for obvious xenophobia (not racist). If someone makes a post about non-whites ok, but it's the language they use and the frequency as well as being completely ignorant/defending white people who do the same. That is not divisive language. You do not know what you are talking about. Divisive language is calling things left and right, saying anyone who believes in climate change is a leftist, anyone who believes in free market capitalism is a righty. Understand what you are saying before you say it.

 

[TimmeT]

How is saying that you use divisive language saying you're a white supremacist/racist like Eriskon? Seriously I would like to know how you managed to reach that conclusion because it's one giant leap for man kind.

I don't really call many people racist and the people I do are patently and obviously racist like Stewies Power. I will call out people for obvious xenophobia (not racist). If someone makes a post about non-whites ok, but it's the language they use and the frequency as well as being completely ignorant/defending white people who do the same. That is not divisive language. You do not know what you are talking about. Divisive language is calling things left and right, saying anyone who believes in climate change is a leftist, anyone who believes in free market capitalism is a righty. Understand what you are saying before you say it.

You got to that point yourself. You're the one who told me that me and my mates don't call out far right protestors who protest against non anglo saxon people and when I gave an example of someone who I have called out who fits the bill of the type of person you are referring to you then wonder how I got there? I even explained it to you and you still have no clue.

Divisive language is used by people looking to harass or abuse people who won't agree with or hold contrary positions to their own. Calling a person a racist for making factual comments about another race for example is one such example. Same with these nutbags who want to assault and call people climate criminals for not supporting their stance.

You had no issue calling Mike Smyth racist did you with no real definitive evidence to support your claim

I just noticed how you like to post videos of black people doing terrible things but not white people, unless they are your arch enemy.

You'd be surprised to know I didn't vote Green or ALP at the last election I bet. Assuming I am left because I despise your racism.

same goes for Fagan Pride

Refusing to buy into this violent scumbag’s attempt at a sob story does not make me a racist. It’s makes you a naive, easily manipulated criminal apologist.

You're a racist.

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news...t/news-story/24c2627df7caf0bac57823e97138e61f

Going to abuse them too?

Yeah, that’s equally as shocking and hope those scumbags are locked up for a very long time.

What’s with the whataboutisms? Does the video posted make you feel uncomfortable and want to change the topic?

 

[Mike Smyth]

You got to that point yourself. You're the one who told me that me and my mates don't call out far right protestors who protest against non anglo saxon people and when I gave an example of someone who I have called out who fits the bill of the type of person you are referring to you then wonder how I got there? I even explained it to you and you still have no clue.

Divisive language is used by people looking to harass or abuse people who won't agree with or hold contrary positions to their own. Calling a person a racist for making factual comments about another race for example is one such example. Same with these nutbags who want to assault and call people climate criminals for not supporting their stance.

You had no issue calling Mike Smyth racist did you with no real definitive evidence to support your claim



same goes for Fagan Pride

Meh. Water off a ducks back. Every white man, who is not a feminine snowflake like him, is a racist.

They have overused the term so often it holds zero meaning or impact. "you're a howwible WACIST!"

 

[ep2018]

Its okay to protest. In a free society you are absolutely allowed to. Unless you're protesting an abortion clinic. Then you can * right off. /left

 

[DangerousD]

Why do they do this?

This week we had another example of left aligned people attack assault and also harass people who did nt conform with nor agree with their views at the conference for the minerals council.

Supporters of the protest used statements to justify their actions such as defending against the climate criminals and using positions such as the police went after them first for their right to assault them. This was while they were blocking people persistently using their bodies or with force and shoving and spitting on those trying to get in.

Examples of this are shown below





Yet we consistenty hear the same people whinge repeatedly regarding the fact that the government isn't tolerant of others, whinges about war like Johnny and Iraq and seeks to marginalise and attack people for certain positions they possess and yet here were are with these same people harassing and attacking people under the same reasoning as they berate and accost the government fgor.

The question I have is why does the left take the moral highground on being good citizens and yet constantly contradicts itself particularly when it comes to being violent. Several protests that the left has engaged particularly in Melbourne recently have become violent due to their beliefs and nothing else. Why can't the left practice the tolerance that they pride themselves on when it comes to protesting

What a ridiculous statement.
A politically or left aligned person can be critical of the government for not being inclusive of others and be right and a left aligned person can be violent and unreasonable at a protest and be wrong. They are not the same person in every instance that represents all left minded people (unless you know one you are referring to)

We had protests 2 weeks ago in Melbourne which were relatively disruptive but mostly violence free, i was mostly supportive, I have been pretty disappointed with the groups protesting this week and dismayed that groups supposedly supporting animal welfare would attack a police horse.

Surely this whole judging everything As either left or right is getting in the way of finding common ground. I mostly support ideas and policy that is left leaning, that doesn’t mean I support every left idea under the sun. Why can’t we just be critical of a group of hardcore protestors regardless of their political beliefs.

 

[The Passenger]

I mostly support ideas and policy that is left leaning, that doesn’t mean I support every left idea under the sun.

Now you've done it. Surefire we to branded a socialist for life.

 

[TimmeT]

amazing actually seeing some retweet that tweet about harold holt disappearing and hoping same happens to scott. these are the same people who were whining about abbott and co standing in front of the sign about witch hgillard. they are now actually happy to go that step further.

 

[Andrew Birch]

 

[Father Jack]

What is the photo of?

 

[Work Hardery]

Only in the UK. A “Diversity” police officer has been charged in the ongoing Asian sex trafficking scandal.

A South Asian (Pakistani) police officer who was hired to promote diversity in the UK police force is among the sixteen men who’ve been charged with a variety of sexual and trafficking offences carried out against teenage girls in Halifax, West Yorkshire.

Among those who’ve been charged with committing sex offences against British children aged between 13 and 16 is 35-year-old Amjad Ditta, also known as Amjad Hussain.

West Yorkshire Police have confirmed that Ditta was, in fact, a police officer who was serving as a “police officer at the time of his alleged offence in 2009”.

Police arrest sixteen men over historic sexual exploitation in Halifax

West Yorkshire Police said the charges relate to alleged offences against three teenage girls in Halifax between 2006 and 2009. PC Amjad Ditta, 35, has been charged with sexual touching

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[douglyzia]

Only in the UK. A “Diversity” police officer has been charged in the ongoing Asian sex trafficking scandal.

All these Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, etc. are getting out of ******* control! Lock them all up!

Muslims are ok, though. I mean, religion of peace and shiiyieet. And when we have all these goddamn orientals perpetrating the most heinous of crimes against our society's most vulnerable, we can never have enough of a religion of peace to counter this virulent phenomenon. And that's where Islam comes in.

 

[Work Hardery]

All these Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, etc. are getting out of ******* control! Lock them all up!

Muslims are ok, though. I mean, religion of peace and shiiyieet. And when we have all these goddamn orientals perpetrating the most heinous of crimes against our society's most vulnerable, we can never have enough of a religion of peace to counter this virulent phenomenon. And that's where Islam comes in.

I love how the UK media attempt to hide nationalities by labelling predominantly Pakistani child grooming/rape gangs as 'Asian' gangs.

 

[douglyzia]

I love how the UK media attempt to hide nationalities by labelling predominantly Pakistani child grooming/rape gangs as 'Asian' gangs.

It's the goddamn orientals, I tells ya!

 

[douglyzia]

Look, Islam is the religion of peace. Anyone who disagrees is Islamophobic. And if East Asians like Chinese, Japanese and Koreans have to be sacrificed for the public to be less Islamophobic, then so be it!!!

Any East Asians who object to this, well, * you man! Don't be so Islamophobic!