Politics Hypocrisy of The Right.

Remove this Banner Ad

Terminology means marriage by another name since new words are still being invented, but bear in mind (1) I'm not religious and therefore not invested in opposing it and (b) there are literally a million things more important to worry about.

I don't have the source(s) at hand, but you'll surely find them if you go looking.
a) I am religious and im not opposing it, nor do i have any vested interest in opposing it.
b) you brought it up.

I had a look, and I can only find that kind of talk from the shitty countries. Not Aus.
 
miley-bb-talk-video-billboard-650.jpg


CTexFpwXAAEvcDU.jpg
Have all the lunatic asylums been closed?

a) I am religious and im not opposing it, nor do i have any vested interest in opposing it.
b) you brought it up.

I had a look, and I can only find that kind of talk from the shitty countries. Not Aus.
(a) Free country and all that. (b) Not in Australia but from the likes of UK and USA from memory
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Some people have pushed for a pre-school age of consent. It won't fly, but there are people mad enough to support it!

I think that legally pre-consent people should be allowed to 'get it on' without fear of criminal charges, i.e a 15 year-old banging their 15 year-old partner is not a sex offender. A post-consent person barely over 18 should get some leeway if they're with say a 17 year old.

Adults preying sexually on the underage - this needs to be legally defined. A maximum age gap of four years between pre and post-consent ages should be sufficient, although an 18 year-old banging a 14 year-old still sounds iffy going by that.
 
I think that legally pre-consent people should be allowed to 'get it on' without fear of criminal charges, i.e a 15 year-old banging their 15 year-old partner is not a sex offender. A post-consent person barely over 18 should get some leeway if they're with say a 17 year old.

Adults preying sexually on the underage - this needs to be legally defined. A maximum age gap of four years between pre and post-consent ages should be sufficient, although an 18 year-old banging a 14 year-old still sounds iffy going by that.
Half the age of the older party plus 7 is a good rule IMO. Will mean 14 yr olds only with 15 yr olds, 18 yr old with 16 yr old . And nothing below 14.
 
MLK, Malcolm X, Muhammad Ali etc.

Whereas the right are cowards.

You might be the toughest, hardcore badarse dude on the planet in real life (and you're always telling us about you and your leftist buddies always winning fights at rallies), but when you post your opinion on an anonymous internet forum that you basically live on, you're not doing your argument any favours when you call people cowards for not dying for their cause.
 
You might be the toughest, hardcore badarse dude on the planet in real life (and you're always telling us about you and your leftist buddies always winning fights at rallies), but when you post your opinion on an anonymous internet forum that you basically live on, you're not doing your argument any favours when you call people cowards for not dying for their cause.

I'm not saying they are cowards for not dying.

I'm saying they are cowards if they cancel public speaking appearances over a few complaint letters.

There's a big difference, and I am not in the slightest bit surprised that you couldn't tell the difference.
 
Left couldn't even beat Clinton, let alone Trump. Total rabble.

Trump and Clinton are both right wing, Sanders coming out of nowhere as a socialist (In America, no less) to be such a huge force that he effectively won the election for Trump, is very significant.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'm not saying they are cowards for not dying.

I'm saying they are cowards if they cancel public speaking appearances over a few complaint letters.

There's a big difference, and I am not in the slightest bit surprised that you couldn't tell the difference.

Complaint letters that involved death threats.
 
Complaint letters that involved death threats.

Yeah, so does that mean they literally have to to die?

Or they got scared by a nasty letter?

Why do they need a safe space to hold a rally?

We had an actual plot against to bomb us at a counter rally, and still went. Right here in Melbourne.

Like I said: the left are heroes, the right are cowards.
 
It was pretty clear to most people, maybe its just you?

Well the picture doesn't really suggest either way. Are you saying that's Trump's playing identity politics by selecting those people? Is Kidd suggesting that having one black man and four women in a group of 20 is identity politics? That picture looks like the sort of thing you'd see on the news complaining about how there's not enough diversity.
 
Well the picture doesn't really suggest either way. Are you saying that's Trump's playing identity politics by selecting those people? Is Kidd suggesting that having one black man and four women in a group of 20 is identity politics? That picture looks like the sort of thing you'd see on the news complaining about how there's not enough diversity.

I'm saying its obvious, and you are playing dumb by pretending you don't get it.

Or you actually don't get it, in which case I'm completely wasting my time anyway.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top