Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
So you ignore the facts I pointed out - that the back page of paper gave us the headline (not the Eagles), said we thrashed Melbourne and are into the top 4 - and just play the man.It doesn't need perspective at all.
It was a shit headline, regardless of the articles contents.
You used to be one of my favourite posters, but of late you are turning into a sanctimonious twat with all of this feel good palava you are going on with.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
So would you go so far to recommend The West as a good read? Like others here, I refuse to buy it. Absolute garbage.I knew you guys would be whinging about that article headline. To put some perspective on it, on the back page of paper was the largest headline "To the top 4, Dockers on the rise after pummelling hapless Melbourne". That was the back page of the paper.
Inside was a more discerning critique of our continued inability to play 4 quarters of football and in particular our poor 3rd quarters. It said we were disappointing in the second half after a scintillating 1st half. It was true and well written.
Get over it. We are getting respect because we are playing good footy but we aren't immune to criticism.
I don't buy it. I have lunch or coffee somewhere that has it lying around on a table and read The Game lift out mainly to read a transcript of the press conference and the WAFL watch. Mark Duffield is a decent journalist who occasionally writes something worth reading. The article causing all the controversy is an example of a well put together piece. The headline was unfortunate and misleading and detracts from what was otherwise a decent critique. We have been poor in 3rd quarters and we didn't finish the game in the style we started.So would you go so far to recommend The West as a good read? Like others here, I refuse to buy it. Absolute garbage.
So you ignore the facts I pointed out - that the back page of paper gave us the headline (not the Eagles), said we thrashed Melbourne and are into the top 4 - and just play the man.
I wan't even addressing you with my post, more the continued chip on the shoulder mentality of Freo supporters in general.
However - If I'm being sanctimonious its in reaction to your hijacking of every thread, bullying of other posters and general abuse of everyone who doesn't fit into your world view of what should and shouldn't be posted here. No one appointed you as the arbiter or moderator of this board.
If you are going to keep trying to throw your weight around as some kind of internet tough guy here I'm going to keep playing devils advocate.
Yep, me too, have not bought for 3-4 yearsSo would you go so far to recommend The West as a good read? Like others here, I refuse to buy it. Absolute garbage.
I have a new name for you.What facts?
The "whinging" as you put it, was about the articles headline. No-one complained about the content at all.
No-one mentioned the back page as it was also irrelevant.
Nor did you, conveniently, mention the corresponding Eagle headline, which was another celebration of Natanui, as usual.
Even though both games were exceptionally similar in the way that they panned out.
But we're supposed to "get over it", (your words again), because you found some futile justification within.
I get a lot of shit on this board for what I say and how I say it. But I will normally back up my posts with balanced reasoning, and or statistics and examples. And I ALWAYS back down and apologise if I am wrong.
You, however, (especially of late), are simply preaching.
Ditto for me, the West is a waste of dough.
As I've said before, it aint even useful in the thunderbox ................... Sorbent is softer !!!!.
A whole heap of St Kilda supporters phoning in to SEN this morning absolutely sinking the slipper into Ross Lyon and praising Scott Watters.
Their jealous tears are delicious.![]()
A whole heap of St Kilda supporters phoning in to SEN this morning absolutely sinking the slipper into Ross Lyon and praising Scott Watters.
Their jealous tears are delicious.![]()
I knew you guys would be whinging about that article headline. To put some perspective on it, on the back page of paper was the largest headline "To the top 4, Dockers on the rise after pummelling hapless Melbourne". That was the back page of the paper.
Inside was a more discerning critique of our continued inability to play 4 quarters of football and in particular our poor 3rd quarters. It said we were disappointing in the second half after a scintillating 1st half. It was true and well written.
Get over it. We are getting respect because we are playing good footy but we aren't immune to criticism.
Why on earth are they getting stuck into RTB, especially if they are so happy with Twatters ?
Because he rejected their offer ?
What the hell for? We had a comfortable win, they lost a close game to a team most thought were struggling. Is that still Ross Lyon's fault 18 months on?
I don't understand what possible praise they could have for Watters, let alone what criticism they could have about Lyon's coaching style... Or was it a bunch of personal attacks and sellout taunts?