Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've always been a fan of head to head as a tie breaker. Imagine if you beat a club twice, finished on the same points but they make top 4 and you don't just because they pummelled someone **** twice?
Reverse alphabetical order.At present, Brisbane and Richmond are 4th and 5th on the ladder, both with the same percentage (103.5) and the same points (24) - so essentially equal 4th.
If this were to happen at the end of the home and away season, what would determine who finishes 4th and who finishes 5th, and therefore gains or loses the double chance.
They’re actually not identical.
Brisbane are 825 / 797 = 103.51%
Richmond are 770 / 744 = 103.49%
Hence Brisbane are 4th, Richmond are 5th.
It would be incredibly, incredibly, incredibly unlikely to have two identical percentages. It’d basically require the clubs to have identical PF and PA figures.
Good old post here: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...ams-finish-with-the-same.897370/post-23189684
In 1940 Carlton and Essendon were dead level in this way after four rounds. This is the latest point in any season that two clubs have ever been dead level on points and percentage.
Thats a fair point so perhaps can only apply if the teams have met twice.Head to head is actually a poor tie breaker in the AFL because we don't play a H&A fixture.
We've beaten Geelong 4 of the last 5 at Subiaco/Optus Stadium. Geelong have beaten us 5/5 (more if you go back further) at Kardinia Park. Imagine those two teams finishing level on points, points for and percentage and the higher position going to the winning side who happened to host the home game that year.
Thats a fair point so perhaps can only apply if the teams have met twice.
They’re actually not identical.
Brisbane are 825 / 797 = 103.51%
Richmond are 770 / 744 = 103.49%
Hence Brisbane are 4th, Richmond are 5th.
It would be incredibly, incredibly, incredibly unlikely to have two identical percentages. It’d basically require the clubs to have identical PF and PA figures.
Good old post here: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...ams-finish-with-the-same.897370/post-23189684
In 1940 Carlton and Essendon were dead level in this way after four rounds. This is the latest point in any season that two clubs have ever been dead level on points and percentage.
What about aggregate Head to Head (rather than W-L) for 5. before coin toss?This is the official order:
1. Points
2. Percentage
3. Points for
4. Head to head
5. Coin toss
I doubt we'll ever get to point 3 let alone 4 or 5.
That can't be right because the 50m arc came in in 1986. In 1987 Jim Stynes penalty for crossing the mark after the siren of the preliminary final was a 15m penalty. For some reason I have it in my head that the 50m penalty was introduced the following year, 1988.In the early 80s the WAFL introduced a number of innovations.
The biggest one was replacing the 15 metre penalty with a 25 and 50 m penalty. Some offences were 50 and crappy stuff like not handing the ball back were 25. The 50 and 25 were marked on the ground to assist umpires in measuring these penalties. Then the VFL accepted the 50m penatly and the 50 m line that went with it. Subi still had both 50 and 25 m lines due to WAFL games. Then the national rules were harmonised and the 25 m penalty vanished... and the 25m line with it.
how does that affect it?That can't be right because the 50m arc came in in 1986. In 1987 Jim Stynes penalty for crossing the mark after the siren of the preliminary final was a 15m penalty. For some reason I have it in my head that the 50m penalty was introduced the following year, 1988.
Well it reads like the 50m arc was an adjunct to implementing the 50m penalty. But the VFL had 50m arcs at least a couple of years before 50m penalties.how does that affect it?
Well it reads like the 50m arc was an adjunct to implementing the 50m penalty. But the VFL had 50m arcs at least a couple of years before 50m penalties.
Seven and Fox would have competing 3 hour lead-ups discussing the tactics behind calling heads or tails.Would love this just to see how the AFL contrives to mediatise a coin toss.
This is the official order:
1. Points
2. Percentage
3. Points for
4. Head to head
5. Coin toss
I doubt we'll ever get to point 3 let alone 4 or 5.