Identical points- identical percentage, end of season?

Remove this Banner Ad

Don't want to remind Melbourne fans of another WC related disappointment but 2017 finished with us in 8th in 12 wins 105.7% and them in 9th on 12 wins 105.2%.

This is the closest meaningful points/percentage finish I can remember in recent history, although Collingwood and Hawthorn did finish on 120.4 and 120.1 last year but both teams had hard Rd 23 games and were just focused on winning.

Even though WC were only a goal or two off finishing lower at no stage were the two percentages in line to be identical. You really need identical points for/against or both teams finishing with round numbers like 2000-1600 vs 2250-1800 so you get percentages that are only one or two decimal places. If we'd both finished on 105.2 it would've really been 105.18752525 vs 105.17353242 sort of thing anyway.
 
I've always been a fan of head to head as a tie breaker. Imagine if you beat a club twice, finished on the same points but they make top 4 and you don't just because they pummelled someone **** twice?

Head to head is actually a poor tie breaker in the AFL because we don't play a H&A fixture.

We've beaten Geelong 4 of the last 5 at Subiaco/Optus Stadium. Geelong have beaten us 5/5 (more if you go back further) at Kardinia Park. Imagine those two teams finishing level on points, points for and percentage and the higher position going to the winning side who happened to host the home game that year.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

At present, Brisbane and Richmond are 4th and 5th on the ladder, both with the same percentage (103.5) and the same points (24) - so essentially equal 4th.

If this were to happen at the end of the home and away season, what would determine who finishes 4th and who finishes 5th, and therefore gains or loses the double chance.
Reverse alphabetical order.
 
It would need to be a near miracle for teams to end up with same amount of wins AND exactly same percentages.
Which would explain why it's never happened before has it?

But if this was to occur, then maybe you can factor in how many wins against the final top 8 teams? eg. Team A wins against 3 of the Final top 8 and Team B wins 2 of the Final top 8 => Team A gets the better ranking.

Alternative humor response: Team A and Team B competes in an AFLX grudge match. Winner gets the better ranking, loser gets to host the first AFLX match the following year.
 
In 1993 Carlton went into the final round against Sydney 1 win behind first placed Essendon, who had the bye.

An exact score of 129-101 would have seen a tie for the McClelland Trophy. The final score was 111-110.

The end of year ladder was:

1. Essendon (13.5 wins), 2333 for, 1959 against, 119.09%
2. Carlton (13.5 wins), 2315 for, 1968 against, 117.63%

This and Sydney-West Coast 2009 were the 2 closest finishes between two sides since 1897. No other 2 sides have come within 40 points +/- of each other for both for and against. In both seasons one side had a better head-to-head record over the other (Sydney 1-0 over WCE, Essendon 1-0 + 1 draw over Carlton).

Goes to show how unlikely, although not impossible, the situation is where the two teams can't be split.
 
Last edited:
They’re actually not identical.

Brisbane are 825 / 797 = 103.51%

Richmond are 770 / 744 = 103.49%

Hence Brisbane are 4th, Richmond are 5th.

It would be incredibly, incredibly, incredibly unlikely to have two identical percentages. It’d basically require the clubs to have identical PF and PA figures.

Good old post here: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...ams-finish-with-the-same.897370/post-23189684

In 1940 Carlton and Essendon were dead level in this way after four rounds. This is the latest point in any season that two clubs have ever been dead level on points and percentage.

The most likely way to have identical percentages would be for two teams to have a percentage of exactly 100.
 
Head to head is actually a poor tie breaker in the AFL because we don't play a H&A fixture.

We've beaten Geelong 4 of the last 5 at Subiaco/Optus Stadium. Geelong have beaten us 5/5 (more if you go back further) at Kardinia Park. Imagine those two teams finishing level on points, points for and percentage and the higher position going to the winning side who happened to host the home game that year.
Thats a fair point so perhaps can only apply if the teams have met twice.
 
They’re actually not identical.

Brisbane are 825 / 797 = 103.51%

Richmond are 770 / 744 = 103.49%

Hence Brisbane are 4th, Richmond are 5th.

It would be incredibly, incredibly, incredibly unlikely to have two identical percentages. It’d basically require the clubs to have identical PF and PA figures.

Good old post here: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...ams-finish-with-the-same.897370/post-23189684

In 1940 Carlton and Essendon were dead level in this way after four rounds. This is the latest point in any season that two clubs have ever been dead level on points and percentage.

Well thats cleared that up.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

In the early 80s the WAFL introduced a number of innovations.

The biggest one was replacing the 15 metre penalty with a 25 and 50 m penalty. Some offences were 50 and crappy stuff like not handing the ball back were 25. The 50 and 25 were marked on the ground to assist umpires in measuring these penalties. Then the VFL accepted the 50m penatly and the 50 m line that went with it. Subi still had both 50 and 25 m lines due to WAFL games. Then the national rules were harmonised and the 25 m penalty vanished... and the 25m line with it.
That can't be right because the 50m arc came in in 1986. In 1987 Jim Stynes penalty for crossing the mark after the siren of the preliminary final was a 15m penalty. For some reason I have it in my head that the 50m penalty was introduced the following year, 1988.
 
That can't be right because the 50m arc came in in 1986. In 1987 Jim Stynes penalty for crossing the mark after the siren of the preliminary final was a 15m penalty. For some reason I have it in my head that the 50m penalty was introduced the following year, 1988.
how does that affect it?
 
Well it reads like the 50m arc was an adjunct to implementing the 50m penalty. But the VFL had 50m arcs at least a couple of years before 50m penalties.

interesting. I was fairly sure in the Wafl, where both came from, that the rationale for both lines was the penalty measurement i wonder
 
In the 2000 VFL season 6th placed Williamstown and 7th placed Box Hill both finished with 13 wins, the Seagulls having a percentage of 114.89 and the Hawks a percentage of 114.88.

They played each other in an Elimination Final but it wasn't a close match, the Seagulls thrashing the Hawks by 45 points in a one-sided game.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top