gavaniacono
Cancelled
Im not anyone.
Independent tribunal needed as sports shouldn’t self-police: ASADA
- Thread starter Muggs
- Start date
- Tagged users None
gavaniacono
Cancelled
Yes that was the intended meaning, as a joke, an altetnative to the more oft heard and haughty, im not "just" anyone.
- Moderator
- #54
hire anyone too, apparently
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
or *cough* Martin Hardie *cough*? I see the gang's all back. And the same scenario still prevails.
yaco55
Hall of Famer
Yes, Guzzle is exaggerating - The fact is it took ASADA 16 months to decide players should be charged, and it took 25 months until the AFL's Anti-Doping Tribunal decision was finalised - This is unacceptable under any circumstances.
Muggs
Premiership Player
- Thread starter
- #60
And now you exaggerating, only took the AFL 9 months not 25 as they can't do anything until players are charged, so count should be from ASADAs charge time not day 1. Of that 9 months a fair chunk of it was due to the Hird and EFC court cases and as found out at CAS that while not a party the players did request a delay in the tribunal until the results of the hearing and appeals are known. The rest of this 9 months is pretty much the normal due process of nearly 20 days of hearing and deliberation time.
Agree though ASADA took to long, which is why the players received back dated bans.
- Jan 16, 2016
- 4,275
- 9,071
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
That's what happens when you have cheats who lie.
- Jul 13, 2015
- 36,521
- 40,711
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
That line says it all.
Anybody who is not a nobody does not post on BF.
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
Oh that statement is doing my head in.
Yes, the CAS found you guilty because your club cheated!!!!! What a s**t club they were!
At least the club's been cleaned out of all the people around at the time, all done, all over and now your club can restart fresh. Finally.
- Jun 28, 2013
- 31,828
- 48,062
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Lots of arguing when it appears most posters are actually agreeing with each other
- Jun 28, 2013
- 31,828
- 48,062
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
That said here's a radical suggestion - maybe the tribunal just got it wrong and it was not a conspiracy. Lots of courts and tribunals get it wrong and have decisions appealed.
Re "independence" - I think it would be good merely in terms of appearance but I cannot honestly say "to avoid fix-ups"
Bigfooty is chock a block with conspiracy theorists. Football drives people mad and makes people post bullshit (me included). The same "lack of logic" bagging out the tribunal from non Eddendon supporters was used by Bomber supporters after the CAS decision - it's a pro-soccer anti afl conspiracy
Crazy - the lot of you
Re "independence" - I think it would be good merely in terms of appearance but I cannot honestly say "to avoid fix-ups"
Bigfooty is chock a block with conspiracy theorists. Football drives people mad and makes people post bullshit (me included). The same "lack of logic" bagging out the tribunal from non Eddendon supporters was used by Bomber supporters after the CAS decision - it's a pro-soccer anti afl conspiracy
Crazy - the lot of you
Muggs
Premiership Player
- Thread starter
- #68
Even more radical maybe the tribunal also got it right based on what was presented...
For example.
ASADA's own expert witnesses not being sure the substance that got molecular tested was TB4...(partly due to molecular testing not being his area of expertise). If ASADA's own expert not sure how could the tribunal be sure?
WADA expert witness, with expertise in molecular testing, was 99% sure.. Ok so CAS could be sure...
But it's all about the optics anyway....
Last edited:
- Jun 28, 2013
- 31,828
- 48,062
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Yep - forgot about that new evidence. Hugely important
More fun to allege AFL conspiracies though isn't it?
