LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
The damage was done in our third innings, not the last one.
A good side still chases that target
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The damage was done in our third innings, not the last one.
Dont think so, almost impossible 4th innings dustbowl vs ashwin.A good side still chases that target
"A good side does this or that" is really a meaningless statement. I would say if we manage to win in India we're a "good side" regardlessA good side still chases that target
Not sure why people are so sure we could never win if we lost the toss. We weren't that far from it last game.
And we really should have at least gotten alot closer than we did.
Such an abysmal run chase in that 4th innings.
Showed a real lack of application, and it starts from Warner. Where was his application? Or is he immune to criticism?
It was a poor shot for sure.
However, other days that could have been given not out.
Showed a real lack of application, and it starts from Warner. Where was his application? Or is he immune to criticism?
No way would I play 2 left arm orthodox spinners against their line up with so many right handers.It will be. I'd still personally play Agar though. Those flatter dart spinners do well in India.
No way would I play 2 left arm orthodox spinners against their line up with so many right handers.
Yeah I don't think I've ever seen anyone get stuck into Warner on here before.
Yeah but footmarks don't come into play against right handers, we saw how ineffective O'Keefe was in the last test, if it's a pitch that suits a left arm orthodox bowler O'Keefe will get the job done, but if it isn't we'll be stuck with 2 (if we play Agar).Orthodox spinners prefer right handers...their arm ball is lethal to them. It means their regular off spinner doesn't need to turn much.
Yeah but footmarks don't come into play, we saw how ineffective O'Keefe was in the last test, if it's a pitch that suits a left arm orthodox bowler O'Keefe will get the job done, but if it isn't we'll be stuck with 2 (if we play Agar).
This is where we'd kill for a player like Watson, a top order batsman who can bowl decent seam.I'd rather play 3 spinners and one quick with Starc injured, with the number 6 being whatever type of AR you want. I love Cummins but I don't see him doing more than Agar, and Agar adds to our batting depth, not saying Cummins can't bat but Agar is better.
Bit then again, without Stark there probably won't be any footmarks for the off spinners to work with.
This is where we'd kill for a player like Watson, a top order batsman who can bowl decent seam.
If we played 3 spinners Stoinis would have to play.
I wouldn't be against Stoinis playing. It is a gamble but he has shown an ability to graft an innings more than Maxwell has.
I agree on watson. jeez we'd kill for a player like him right now. to think we tried to replace him with Mitch Marsh..
I'd rather gamble on Maxwell because he has shedloads more batting talent.
Toss will be crucial, lose it and we have to be batting by the end of today, if not it's game over, I'd play Bird ahead of Cummins, just don't trust Cummins to get through the game, get him right for game 4, as for the other replacement, a lot will depend on net sessions.