Is the Indigenous Round an example of the AFL doing some of its best work, very selective spin of the history of whats best for the AFL itself, promoted to the hilt by an unquestioning football media.
Tom Wills, Marngrook, the VFL years, the AFL years, the VFL/AFL, Michael Long, Nicky Winmar , booing Adam Goodes ... the history of our game, albeit very narrowly focussed.
A challenge from the wider media:
The AFL’s Indigenous Round, it needs to be more than tokenistic
http://thenewdaily.com.au/sport/afl...ys&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20170527_TND
The AFL should either scrap both or acknowledge that Indigenous Australians’ contribution to football is more than we and the league are willing to accept.
Personally I'd say its tokenistic, but better than nothing.
Equally I'm concerned by the spin in a recent Kevin Sheedy quote in the run up to this weekend, narrow & misleading, well intentioned buy ignoring the path of the indigenous kids playing this weekend focussing on VFL/AFL history as if the VFL did much at all involving indigenous football.
Then The New Daily article paints the AFL administration in context:
... an AFL spokesperson declared: “Ultimately any view on our game’s history is really a matter for the AFL Commission through the Hall of Fame.”
On this Indigenous weekend we see the Dockers including a new record 8 Indigenous players, chalk it up for the AFL comp, not all that surprising that South Fremantle Footy Club indigenous players had played more than 2000 games during the 20th century, including the likes of generations of the Riolis, and the legend that is Stephen Michael.
Lets hope more is done to ensure a balanced view of the history of our game, not just the AFL spin. That's not to say The New Daily has a focus on anything but the AFL itself, not indigenous footy more broadly.
Tom Wills, Marngrook, the VFL years, the AFL years, the VFL/AFL, Michael Long, Nicky Winmar , booing Adam Goodes ... the history of our game, albeit very narrowly focussed.
A challenge from the wider media:
The AFL’s Indigenous Round, it needs to be more than tokenistic
http://thenewdaily.com.au/sport/afl...ys&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20170527_TND
The AFL should either scrap both or acknowledge that Indigenous Australians’ contribution to football is more than we and the league are willing to accept.
Personally I'd say its tokenistic, but better than nothing.
Equally I'm concerned by the spin in a recent Kevin Sheedy quote in the run up to this weekend, narrow & misleading, well intentioned buy ignoring the path of the indigenous kids playing this weekend focussing on VFL/AFL history as if the VFL did much at all involving indigenous football.
Then The New Daily article paints the AFL administration in context:
... an AFL spokesperson declared: “Ultimately any view on our game’s history is really a matter for the AFL Commission through the Hall of Fame.”
On this Indigenous weekend we see the Dockers including a new record 8 Indigenous players, chalk it up for the AFL comp, not all that surprising that South Fremantle Footy Club indigenous players had played more than 2000 games during the 20th century, including the likes of generations of the Riolis, and the legend that is Stephen Michael.
Lets hope more is done to ensure a balanced view of the history of our game, not just the AFL spin. That's not to say The New Daily has a focus on anything but the AFL itself, not indigenous footy more broadly.
Last edited: