Analysis Inexperience watch

[Jivlain]

	Carlton	Brisbane
(0 to 10 games)	2	2
0 to 24 games	2	2
25 to 49 games	5	2
50 to 99 games	4	5
100 to 199 games	9	10
200+ games	2	3
Games played	107.36	114.23
Age	26.33	26.30
Height	187.36	188.18

Interactive version

 

[briztoon]

View attachment 1109692

	Carlton	Brisbane
(0 to 10 games)	2	2
0 to 24 games	2	2
25 to 49 games	5	2
50 to 99 games	4	5
100 to 199 games	9	10
200+ games	2	3
Games played	107.36	114.23
Age	26.33	26.30
Height	187.36	188.18

Interactive version

Shouldn’t be any excuses for Carlton with that age and game experience profile.

 

[Jivlain]

	Brisbane	Port Adelaide
(0 to 10 games)	3	4
0 to 24 games	3	5
25 to 49 games	3	2
50 to 99 games	5	6
100 to 199 games	8	8
200+ games	3	1
Games played	103.18	92.86
Age	25.97	25.45
Height	188.36	187.55

Interactive version

 

[Section 5]

View attachment 1115233

	Brisbane	Port Adelaide
(0 to 10 games)	3	4
0 to 24 games	3	5
25 to 49 games	3	2
50 to 99 games	5	6
100 to 199 games	8	8
200+ games	3	1
Games played	103.18	92.86
Age	25.97	25.45
Height	188.36	187.55

Interactive version

Wow that was quick well done. Inside info??
Interesting we have 10 more games in experience

 

[KissKiss]

That is closer than I thought. Boak and their injuries match ours reasonably

 

[BangyBangy]

That is closer than I thought. Boak and their injuries match ours reasonably

And assuming the conditions are slippery the uncontested possession game won't suit.

 

[Milux]

We are certainly coming into that sweet spot with age/experience. Few years ago it always seemed to be around 60-70 games experience. So refreshing.

 

[Jivlain]

	Brisbane	Fremantle
(0 to 10 games)	2	2
0 to 24 games	2	4
25 to 49 games	3	5
50 to 99 games	5	5
100 to 199 games	9	7
200+ games	3	1
Games played	109.95	87.05
Age	26.18	25.33
Height	188.55	187.00

Interactive version

 

[Jivlain]

	Gold Coast	Brisbane
(0 to 10 games)	3	2
0 to 24 games	7	2
25 to 49 games	6	2
50 to 99 games	4	6
100 to 199 games	4	9
200+ games	1	3
Games played	57.18	110.95
Age	23.83	26.20
Height	187.59	188.55

Interactive version

 

[luthor]

View attachment 1127690

	Gold Coast	Brisbane
(0 to 10 games)	3	2
0 to 24 games	7	2
25 to 49 games	6	2
50 to 99 games	4	6
100 to 199 games	4	9
200+ games	1	3
Games played	57.18	110.95
Age	23.83	26.20
Height	187.59	188.55

Interactive version

As always, a most informative analysis.

If we lose this match, it will only because we deserve to.

 

[Section 5]

That is a huge gap in experience for the Suns to overcome
We just need a reasonable start as they will be up and about early
As the game goes on we should get the upper hand and we should end up with a solid win

 

[Milux]

Super curious to see how we stack up against Richmond.

 

[Jivlain]

	Brisbane	Richmond
(0 to 10 games)	4	3
0 to 24 games	4	5
25 to 49 games	2	2
50 to 99 games	6	4
100 to 199 games	7	8
200+ games	3	3
Games played	98.95	103.55
Age	25.68	26.15
Height	187.95	186.86

Interactive version

 

[Dalions]

Very even.
We get em in Clearances and contested possessions and personally, I think that is where this game will be won.

 

[Section 5]

We have dropped below the 100 game average so i wondered if that had happened before in 2021
Going back over this thread i was pleased to see that we beat the Pies with an average just shy of 100
So now feel a bit better

 

[Tom14]

We have dropped below the 100 game average so i wondered if that had happened before in 2021
Going back over this thread i was pleased to see that we beat the Pies with an average just shy of 100
So now feel a bit better

Once you lose two 100 game players and replace them with two players under 10 games, its going to have an impact. I'm actually pleasantly surprised that it has dropped to just below 100.

Our best side would have three players above 120 games added in (Lester, Neale, Gardiner), plus Berry (77 games) and presumably 4 players under 50 games out. So quite a difference to the average.

 

[Section 5]

Once you lose two 100 game players and replace them with two players under 10 games, its going to have an impact. I'm actually pleasantly surprised that it has dropped to just below 100.

Our best side would have three players above 120 games added in (Lester, Neale, Gardiner), plus Berry (77 games) and presumably 4 players under 50 games out. So quite a difference to the average.

Yes i understand all that

Over the years it is the increase in experience and the type of players that is responsible for our rise to a top 4 side
This is why i prefer our team to be over 100 games rather than under
The more over 100 the better chance we have of winning any given game
Geelong are a good example of why they have been so good over the years
They have an insane average from year to year recently
Just looking at this weekends game their average is 138. I could pick any game for them
In our loss to Geelong in the PF they had 162 games experience to our 114

 

[Jivlain]

	Brisbane	GWS Giants
(0 to 10 games)	4	4
0 to 24 games	4	10
25 to 49 games	2	0
50 to 99 games	6	7
100 to 199 games	7	3
200+ games	3	2
Games played	99.95	70.77
Age	25.70	25.11
Height	187.95	189.86

Interactive version

 

[Section 5]

100 games experience looks much much better than 99.95

 

[ZoBlitz]

Disappointingly just missed out on Bradman's average.

 

[Milux]

100 games experience looks much much better than 99.95

Loss coming up.

 

[luthor]

Disappointingly just missed out on Bradman's average.

Beat it by 0.01

Brisbane Lions better than Bradman.

 

[Jivlain]

	Melbourne	Brisbane
(0 to 10 games)	0	2
0 to 24 games	5	3
25 to 49 games	3	2
50 to 99 games	3	5
100 to 199 games	11	9
200+ games	0	3
Games played	88.09	113.59
Age	24.74	26.21
Height	188.14	187.73

Interactive version

 

[dlanod]

Wow when did we become such an old team.

 

[Nunez]

Wow when did we become such an old team.

Old man Birch dragging our Ave age up