theprospector
Team Captain
- Aug 9, 2015
- 364
- 754
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Starting to realise the real answer is if Sydney are in the other prelim, your prelim is the grand final
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Between Everitt, Loewe, Vidovic and Winmar it was a cursed last week of a finals series.1997 - St Kilda were a vastly different team without Everitt in the ruck.
As Sydney's Grand Final history is poor, the winner was always going to come out of either GWS or Bulldogs back in 2016Starting to realise the real answer is if Sydney are in the other prelim, your prelim is the grand final
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Port vs Hawks in 2014 is another mention. Swans smashed North the previous day and that prelim was a thriller. Had Port kicked straight they would've made the GF from 5th but the Hawks went on to dominate Sydney and win by 10 goals.Controversial pick but I think Hawthorn v Crows in 2012 was the real GF match up.
They were the two best teams in it all year IMO. Dangerfield's coming of age was that final series.
Had we kicked straight we would have blitzed the Swans. Was very much an 08 like choke.
Dead right about that finals system. Crows won the '98 GF despite a thumping at the hands of the Dees in their first final after finishing 5th, but advance to the second week. By contrast sides like St.Kilda in 1992 are bundled out despite finishing 3rd, but lose their week one final and are out on their backsides.Nice try, but no.
Essendon had been top all year, hardly an irrelevant opponent.
That amazing Prelim you remember was a blow out for the entire second half. North kicked 13 of the last 16 goals.
I suspect you've made this argument so many times that you have slowly exaggerated it over time and not noticed.
And there's also the little matter of this:
View attachment 2427890
View attachment 2427891
PS How stupid was the old finals system? Carlton finish 6th, get destroyed and still get a double chance.
Port vs Hawks in 2014 is another mention. Swans smashed North the previous day and that prelim was a thriller. Had Port kicked straight they would've made the GF from 5th but the Hawks went on to dominate Sydney and win by 10 goals.
I agree with this.2019 Prelim - Richmond vs Geelong.
really? I was there, wasn't a great game. Not one I would have said "this deserves to be a GF"1997 - St Kilda were a vastly different team without Everitt in the ruck.
yeah.. so the correct answer is 1994 PF, NM v Geelong. Best game I've ever been to, even though we lost. Had absolutely everything, including a fair dose of questionable umpiring.The old McIntyre 8 system used from the mid-late 90s
Haha my god you W.A people are something else, GF was a genuine 50/50, the story you just made up was the one your inferiority complex constructed.Never. Case in Point, 2018:
Vic based media portrayed Collingwood v Richmond as the real GF, with the winner assumed victory the following week. They totally ignored the Eagles victory over the Pies, and then the demolition of the Dees.
We ended up getting one of the greatest GFs, which was NOT won by the victor of Collingwood v Richmond.
The GF is ALWAYS the real GF - but yes, 1 team may go in heavy favourites.
?That's.... the point
Actually one of the prouder losses I've witnessed. I don't know how Tigers fans feel, but that half time lead was built on Geelong literally throwing everything they had at Richmond, who really were team of destiny. I mean we had Ratagoulea in the ruck ffs and Lachie Henderson at FF (Hawkins suspended).I agree with this.
Even when Geelong were In front at half time, Richmond were gonna slowly and gradually fight back.
Bulldogs vs Crows went right down to the wire. The GF didn't.?
From OP:
"when a prelim was a lot better than the Grand Final"
"What a beauty of a game of footy that was"
That 97 prelim wasn't a lot better than the 97 GF, and it wasn't a beauty of a game of footy.
Story I made up? Yes the GF was a 50/50 (thats my point) - but that's NOT how it was portrayed before hand. If you lived in a bubble and missed the media hype around Pies/Tigers, then great!Haha my god you W.A people are something else, GF was a genuine 50/50, the story you just made up was the one your inferiority complex constructed.
I really do think people from the west have a wonderfully distorted view of the media over here, especially during finals.Never. Case in Point, 2018:
Vic based media portrayed Collingwood v Richmond as the real GF, with the winner assumed victory the following week. They totally ignored the Eagles victory over the Pies, and then the demolition of the Dees.
We see the same shows you do - they're all based in Victoria.I really do think people from the west have a wonderfully distorted view of the media over here, especially during finals.
My distinct recollection was that the Prelim was pretty much going to be a smashing and that the natural Grand Final was Richmond v West Coast, based on the Eagles beating Collingwood a fortnight earlier (and Eagles and Tiges being 1 and 2).
Even when WA win a premiership, they have to turn it into a gripe about Victoria.
The media (Vic media if you must) very much saw the Pies and Tiges as having a great atmosphere and probably pointed out that it hadn't happened since 1980, but that's not the same as ignoring the blindingly obvious and that the 'real' expected GF was West Coast v Richmond.We see the same shows you do - they're all based in Victoria.
This wasnt a gripe about Victoria - this was an example when a lot of people saw a PL as the "real GF", that didnt pan out - if you didn't see that, then great!
But your right - everyone expected Tiges to win the PL and the GF - everyone else was just making up numbers.