haven't heard much spoken about it in the first 2 games.
does anyone know what they were?
does anyone know what they were?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Article today on afl.com.au
Richmond legend Kevin Bartlett is a long-time advocate for reducing rotations, believing the interchange bench had been hijacked by coaches as a tactical tool.
St Kilda champion Nick Riewoldt has supported a drop in rotations to 40 a game, saying it would stretch the ground and help key forwards, putting an emphasis back on endurance – rather than power – running.
There never used to be a problem?Yeah that will be great Nick, more athletes and less footballers is what this game needs!
Billy Hartung will be traded back to Hawthorn for pick 1 next year!
There never used to be a problem?
What a top bloke. Answering a guy who was left hanging longer than 3 & a half years.Article today on afl.com.au
Richmond legend Kevin Bartlett is a long-time advocate for reducing rotations, believing the interchange bench had been hijacked by coaches as a tactical tool.
St Kilda champion Nick Riewoldt has supported a drop in rotations to 40 a game, saying it would stretch the ground and help key forwards, putting an emphasis back on endurance – rather than power – running.
Or that even endurance athletes wouldn’t be able to run up and down the ground all game, so players abilities (footballer over athlete), becomes more important.Yeah that will be great Nick, more athletes and less footballers is what this game needs!
Billy Hartung will be traded back to Hawthorn for pick 1 next year!
Id support less intetchange, I reckon we would see more genuine positional play and one on one contests.
Correct. The game has just become about zones and short passages of play. I'd love a genuine one on one between a Rance and Franklin for example.Id support less intetchange, I reckon we would see more genuine positional play and one on one contests.
Eddie came out yesterday and said reduced IC bench could lead to players being more tempted to use PEDs! No s**t, that's what he said.....
https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/co...e/news-story/1a00a167eefb9b4d0ac38fd5c425b6c8
Yeah that will be great Nick, more athletes and less footballers is what this game needs!
Billy Hartung will be traded back to Hawthorn for pick 1 next year!
There’s been reduced interchange recently right?
Yet the so called problem still exists as strong as ever
So the people who called for the first reduction are asking for more, yet apparently it hasn’t worked so far?
They used to call these people quacks.
(I could be persuaded by hard data, but as there’s non forthcoming, just ‘gut feel’ I assume none)
There’s been reduced interchange recently right?
Yet the so called problem still exists as strong as ever
So the people who called for the first reduction are asking for more, yet apparently it hasn’t worked so far?
They used to call these people quacks.
(I could be persuaded by hard data, but as there’s non forthcoming, just ‘gut feel’ I assume none)
If/when you get that data, remember it is/was a trend.
If the rate the problem (however that problem is defined) was getting worse was slowed, then reducing the numbers has been a success, and further reduction could well be warranted, even though it actually got worse.
It hasn't worked?
Then why are athletes like Masten, Blicavs, Hill, Hartung etc being found out?