- Thread starter
- #151
Again, handball is more likely to have influenced Gaelic than been influenced by it. Is there even evidence of the existence of handballing in football in Ireland at this point? Given the degree to which football was a creation of WASPs (off season game for cricketers), what even would be the mechanism for an influence?I have and game has still gone major changes in almost every way.
The adopted Geelong rules of 1866 give a better idea of a game.
6. Ball must be bounced every 10 or 20 yards if carried. Absent from the original rules.
7. Tripping, holding, hacking prohibited. Pushing with hands or body is allowed when any player is in rapid motion or in possession of ball, except in the case of a mark. No holding is implied but not spelt out.
8. Mark is when a player catches the ball before it hits the ground and has been clearly kicked by another player. Rule is improved and integral.
9. Handball only allowed if ball held clearly in one hand and punched or hit out with other. If caught, no mark. Throwing prohibited. The subject of passing by hand is addressed. Clearly anti-rugby and very possibly a Gaelic influence.
If Australian football was set up to be it's own thing and not a copy of English sport, why would a group of English or English descended toffs turn around and copy Irish sport, it makes no sense.
It's like people freak out at the idea that something popular started here, and have to think it was influenced externally.
Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk