Of course, how silly of me.They can just say the ballroom is historical. Like Richmond v Carlton in round 1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Of course, how silly of me.They can just say the ballroom is historical. Like Richmond v Carlton in round 1
He's dueling with OGC in the neverneverRemember that cooked mod blowing smoke up trumps ass? I wonder if he still stands by trumpy now he's gone full fascist.
He's dueling with OGC in the nevernever
I initially read that as demolishing the First Lady's orifices.The story about Trump's Big Beautiful Ballroom has crept up on me. Apparently, they're demolishing the entire East Wing of the White House, which houses the First Lady's offices (metaphor).
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
She's too old for thatI initially read that as demolishing the First Lady's orifices.
2028 will be a huge shit fight in USA. Steve Bannon has outlined again, I've seen him a couple of other times, that Trump will be going for a 3rd Term, despite what the constitution says, in this interview with The Economist yesterday.
I suspect Democrats are asleep to him and his colleagues. Someone should test this at the Supreme Court now, not wait till 2028. Bannon is ex military and loves to take a war footing approach to just about everything. He and others will need to be confronted by equally tough bastards. I know its not wise to bet against the USA collapsing, but 2028 could be a massive schism year.
The short 2 minute version
The longer 13 minute version
2028 will be a huge shit fight in USA. Steve Bannon has outlined again, I've seen him a couple of other times, that Trump will be going for a 3rd Term, despite what the constitution says, in this interview with The Economist yesterday.
I suspect Democrats are asleep to him and his colleagues. Someone should test this at the Supreme Court now, not wait till 2028. Bannon is ex military and loves to take a war footing approach to just about everything. He and others will need to be confronted by equally tough bastards. I know its not wise to bet against the USA collapsing, but 2028 could be a massive schism year.
The short 2 minute version
The longer 13 minute version
The Constitution doesn't prevent him running as VP on a JD Vance ticket and them "arranging a handover" at some point. The 22nd Amendment only limits people to being elected twice but doesn't say anything about other forms of succession.
Putin got around constitutional presidential limits by shuffling between President and Prime Minister and installing a stooge as President to keep the seat warm for him. I'm sure Trump will find a way to shuffle between VP and President, that's if he doesn't just ignore the Constitution entirely and strong arm the Supreme Court into anointing an "interpretation" which permits perpetual terms.
The Constitution doesn't prevent him running as VP on a JD Vance ticket and them "arranging a handover" at some point. The 22nd Amendment only limits people to being elected twice but doesn't say anything about other forms of succession.
Putin got around constitutional presidential limits by shuffling between President and Prime Minister and installing a stooge as President to keep the seat warm for him. I'm sure Trump will find a way to shuffle between VP and President, that's if he doesn't just ignore the Constitution entirely and strong arm the Supreme Court into anointing an "interpretation" which permits perpetual terms.
It's far from clear.It does prevent him. The 12th amendment states…
“No person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice President of the United States"
Trump is constitutionally ineligible to be president for a third term so that makes him ineligible to be a vice presidential candidate in any future election. Makes perfect sense when considering that the scope of the veep includes acting as president in unforeseen circumstances.
As worded, the focus of the 22nd Amendment is on limiting individuals from being elected to the presidency more than twice. Questions have been raised about the amendment's meaning and application, especially in relation to the 12th Amendment, ratified in 1804, which states, "But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."[25] While the 12th Amendment stipulates that the constitutional qualifications of age, citizenship, and residency apply to the president and vice president, it is unclear whether someone who is ineligible to be elected president due to term limits could be elected vice president. Because of the ambiguity, a two-term former president could possibly be elected vice president and then succeed to the presidency as a result of the incumbent's death, resignation, or removal from office, or succeed to become Acting President from another stated office in the presidential line of succession.
The rich kind.This Supreme Court has twisted ideas about what the Constitution means.
But that being said, what kind of cuck would you be to get elected President and then give it up for Trump?
Laws don't apply to those in powerful positionsI’m sure they would have that legally covered.
the couch-****ing, eyeliner wearing kindwhat kind of cuck would you be to get elected President and then give it up for Trump?
"Those are really hard, they're really aptitude tests, I guess, in a certain way. But they're cognitive tests," Trump said.
"The first couple of questions are easy. A tiger, an elephant, a giraffe, you know. When you get up to about five or six, and then when you get up to 10 and 20 and 25, they couldn't come close to answering any of those questions," Trump added."
And we should do what, exactly?
Donald Trump sees everything in terms of dollars. As an example he is sinking Venezuelan speed boats as it is cheaper to exterminate the drug runners than to put them on trial and keep them locked up for twenty or so years. Donald has probably done the sums and figured one carefully aimed missile or two is cheaper then housing and feeding twenty or so Venezuelans for all those years.
Ironically one of the few things I can support Trump on is his dislike for Nicolas Maduro. Trump dislikes Maduro but likes Balsanaro who is yet another South American despot. Consistently inconsistent is Donald.
The Venezuelan thing is absolutely nothing to do with drugs. It's just an excuse because they don't like the current administration and want to install a puppet government conducive to US interests.
You've changed man.I LOVE DONALD