Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nobody here said he was as far as I can tell?There may have been a guy called Jesus, but no way he was the son of some God.
Why? He coached us to a premiership didn’t he? Something Buckley hasn’t done.If Buck's is the second coming, who was the first.......
........Surely not MM
Except there is evidence Jesus existed
Lol. You didn't do high school history?Well seeing as how there is no evidence Jesus ever existed, it has to be Bucks
Don't understand, sorryWhy? He coached us to a premiership didn’t he? Something Buckley hasn’t done.
Like what? That Mike is educated enough to know that a Jewish carpenter named Jesus existed?
How about you read through the thread before jumping to false conclusions.Well according to a few juiced up monks and religious zealots anyway.
Not a no-name carpenter. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that Jesus of Nazareth was a person who actually existed. The debate lies around what he actually did to gain the notoriety that eventually led to him being named as the son of god in the bible.Valid point if the OP was inferring to some no-name, nobody carpenter from a bygone era named Jesus.
Maybe you should follow the thread before making these types of statements, and take religion out of the thought process.Well according to a few juiced up monks and religious zealots anyway.
There is none as as much as they like to portray fables and myths as evidence, no thinking person will ever accept itWell according to a few juiced up monks and religious zealots anyway.
Stop being a nuff nuff, you were handed reliable sources.There is none as as much as they like to portray fables and myths as evidence, no thinking person will ever accept it
He’s probably got them all on ignore.Stop being a nuff nuff, you were handed reliable sources.
No I wasn't, I was handed a couple of names that fully supports the overwhelming view there is no evidence....but you knew that when you posted, that's why you backed away from the discussion, because even someone like you who lives in an alternate reality knows a fairy story when they hear oneStop being a nuff nuff, you were handed reliable sources.
Now you’re just making s**t up. I provided you evidence and you ignored it.No I wasn't, I was handed a couple of names that fully supports the overwhelming view there is no evidence....but you knew that when you posted, that's why you backed away from the discussion, because even someone like you who lives in an alternate reality knows a fairy story when they hear one
Jesus had a better beard but otherwise I think Bucks has him covered.
Poll attached.
You will be. The rest of us have some sense.
Valid point if the OP was inferring to some no-name, nobody carpenter from a bygone era named Jesus.
On the OP, Bucks is clearly bigger. Average height of males between 200BC and 200AD is estimated at about 170cm, Bucks is about 185cm. Be a similar tale in terms of weight.
How about you read through the thread before jumping to false conclusions.