1) No, Globalism
isnt defined as 'the global agenda for neoliberalism'.
Globalism is defined as 'The operation or planning of economic and foreign policy on a global basis.'
Thats from the
OED.
The Soviet Union was Globalist in that it actively sought to impose, support and implement global communism (for example).
2) Neoliberalism isnt the same thing as liberalism any more than libertarianism is. Only a fool would suggest it is. It's its own unique version of liberalism that has embraced globalism (in this case by promoting embrace of the free market globally, and pushing for increased deregulation, removing tariffs and other barriers to trade etc), and moves away from Keynesian economics and embraces deregulation. Its goal is the spread of liberalism to other nations via (mainly) the market. It tends towards ditching positive liberty (embraced by social and democratic liberals) in favor of a more negative liberty approach (embraced by libertarians).
I'm a liberal, and I'm no neoliberal. I thoroughly disagree with much of neoliberal policies and practices. Like I said above, as a liberal, I believe that the market should be regulated, in so far as is reasonably needed to stop harm from occurring. I support Trade Unions. I support 'socialized' health, the welfare State and education as a public good. I support limited protectionism to avoid 'Detroit Michigan' from happening in Australia. Like I said before, I support Keynes over Hayek (while still retaining may principles of the latter).
These are all things that Neoliberals would thoroughly repudiate.
Social/ Democratic liberals (Hawkes) and Neoliberals (Howards) dont exactly see eye to eye on a lot of things. Your inability to understand this, doesnt make it less real.