Stan. said:
Im quite confident my first impression of him is the right one ,in that he will always be soft and always has been even when playing a fairly high level of basketball.
So what if he hasnt played 22 senior games yet whats that supposed to mean?
There are hundreds of kids around the country who get judged whether there good enough or not by the time there 16 and still a couple of years away from seniors.
And vinnie is a tool who has never said an intelligent or coherent word on any subject during his time on big footy, he's a total assclown.
And as for u pindik if you dont like what i say put me on your ignore list, dumbass.
EL OH EL, pal!
1) Please produce the evidence that he was *soft* in Basketball. I'm under the impression he wasn't the best, but please, explain how he was soft. Having played Basketball for a number of years at rep level, I’d be interested to know.
PS: What relevance does this have to his
football?
2) So what? He hasn't played 22
senior games of Australian Rules Football PERIOD and you come back with "so what?".
8/10 times a possible draftee goes back to their respective local club whether it be from TAC Cup, COLTS or what have you, I can guarantee you 100% that they play senior football. Going into the draft, most players have senior experience at some level. Fanning is extremely raw for a *more mature aged* player then some teenage draftees. You've already passed judgment and he hasn't even played a full season of
senior football at ANY level. How can one determine whether another is soft or a dud having seen so little?
3) Any moron could come up with insults that aren't as lame, compared to a catholic boy, you're very tame. I’ve read plenty of your posts and I suggest you stick to what you know best, Stan and that’s producing irreverent and in-correct facts to *try* and win a battle.