- Aug 17, 2006
- 23,285
- 21,580
- AFL Club
- Geelong
It has to be a suspension and I'd absolutely say the same thing if the jumpers were reversed. Clearly intentional, clearly high, clearly had a bit of force on it and (not that it's factored in, but anyway) it was a cheap shot at an opponent with his back turned. Surely the only debate could be one or two weeks?