
BrewSmackerVeiny
Club Legend
I don't mind it, huge improvement over that nonsense they were using.
I was thinking the exact same thing. It looks really close to red and black. From far, it looks blackDon't know if it's my eyes, but does the blue in the Melbourne logo look even darker than before?
Agreed, it does.New Melbourne logo looks pretty good IMO
They could all use some refining but these are the best ideas so far. I get what you're going for with the bottom left one but as was said, it just ends up looking like a recoloured Target logo. It might be worth adding a plane to it like the Winnipag Jets have.
Why not?Well now we definitely can't use the monogram.
(Good.)
I was actually going to make the point that the only clubs in the league that don't use their nickname in their logo are Carlton (because blue is a colour), Fremantle (for legal reasons) and GWS (super modern logo thing). Not sure what Melbourne's excuse is - probably something to do with being the first club.Monograms are okay. But not as a main logo.
If we get rid of a plane off the logo we may as well get rid of the bombers part of our name.
Monograms for logos reek of Carlton. Funnily enough the demons have been trying to be Carlton for years with their tanking.
It's been a disastrous decade, so it's kinda justified.Agreed, it does.
But it's like their fourth rebrand in ten years - do it that often and starts to become meaningless IMO.
pfft, forget the 90s one, we should go back to the 50's one!!Can we go back to the old 90's bomber logo. That rocked.
100 year old logo
Yep. Looks like they don't know who they are.
Let's wear purple stripes and play with sandles. No one will see it coming.I wasn't before, but I am now completely up for a change in logo/branding. Let's use 2016 to refresh and rebrand, come out 2017 with a whole different look and attitude.