Analysis Is Leppa the Right Man for the Job?

[Dalions]

Are you able to private msg me who as I would love to know more but won't mention it online or anywhere?

Wouldnt even know how to do that.
But surely it is not that hard to guess.

 

[Roylion]

There have been 3 names floated as leaving at the end of the year. I can tell you with certainty it is not one of them.

Well that leaves Murray Davis, Danny Daly, Mitch Hahn, Ben Hudson, Leigh Harding and Scott Borlace.

"Toxic culture" is a phrase that is thrown around quite a bit these days. What exactly does that entail? "Sick of losing"?

 

[Dalions]

Well that leaves Murray Davis, Danny Daly, Mitch Hahn, Ben Hudson, Leigh Harding and Scott Borlace.

"Toxic culture" is a phrase that is thrown around quite a bit these days. What exactly does that entail? "Sick of losing"?

Apparently the whole playing list are just a pack of whingers aswell.

 

[jackess]

What's wrong with the board disagreeing, especially on such a major decision. That's why you have more than 1 board member. So you can get multiple opinions.

 

[Jimmy Two Hands]

What a bloody mess!

Is there any possibility that there is at least one person at this club who can get to the bottom of what/who the hell is causing these so-call divisions in the club....and how, so that it can be fixed ASAP

...and is there any danger that we could possibly all work together as one big team, in all areas,and present as a united, strong club?

I think the reality is that ALL clubs have divisions/factions of varying complexity and hostility - its the nature of chucking a lot of strong personalities and egos into a pot. I.e. Longtime rumours of Sam Mitchell being a very divisive presence in the Hawks playing group - however, these can all be handled easily when the club is winning and performing well. People shutup and focus when a premiership is a reality.

Get the onfield performance right and the rest snowballs.

 

[Skoob]

What's wrong with the board disagreeing, especially on such a major decision. That's why you have more than 1 board member. So you can get multiple opinions.

Disagreeing and differences of opinion are one thing, but if there is a constant split, ie the same 4 disagreeing with another same 4, then they are fundamentally opposed. If they are often at polar opposites, then a fair chance one side of the table is wrong, which means you only have half a board, struggling to make/enact decisions.

 

[Squizz89]

What's wrong with the board disagreeing, especially on such a major decision. That's why you have more than 1 board member. So you can get multiple opinions.

What about if one of those board members (allegedly) has more of a say then others however?

 

[Skoob]

I think the reality is that ALL clubs have divisions/factions of varying complexity and hostility - its the nature of chucking a lot of strong personalities and egos into a pot. I.e. Longtime rumours of Sam Mitchell being a very divisive presence in the Hawks playing group - however, these can all be handled easily when the club is winning and performing well. People shutup and focus when a premiership is a reality.

Get the onfield performance right and the rest snowballs.

That might be very hard if off-field decisions aren't made or made well.

 

[jackess]

What about if one of those board members (allegedly) has more of a say then others however?

The board is not going to always function perfectly. It's up to us members to hold them to account.

 

[geekOnaught]

Disagreeing and differences of opinion are one thing, but if there is a constant split, ie the same 4 disagreeing with another same 4, then they are fundamentally opposed. If they are often at polar opposites, then a fair chance one side of the table is wrong, which means you only have half a board, struggling to make/enact decisions.

#auspol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[geekOnaught]

The board is not going to always function perfectly. It's up to us members to hold them to account.

If the AFL let us...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[notliondown]

Apparently the whole playing list are just a pack of whingers aswell.

OK so now I'm confused.

Are these "toxic" comments aimed at anything in particular or just generally? Is it in reference to the coaches or players or both?

 

[notliondown]

Disagreeing and differences of opinion are one thing, but if there is a constant split, ie the same 4 disagreeing with another same 4, then they are fundamentally opposed. If they are often at polar opposites, then a fair chance one side of the table is wrong, which means you only have half a board, struggling to make/enact decisions.

My biggest concern is, with all due respect to them, the quality of our board members.

In the heartland it would be far easier to attract a person who is not only business and corporate world savvy but also a passionate football and club person. Here I would suggest we would struggle to more than a couple of individuals who meet both criteria to a high level.

If they're going to butt heads I really don't have a problem. It's more why they butt heads and if they actually know themselves.

 

[Surly Boy]

Pretty lukewarm assessment of Leppa from Sauce Merrett on SEN this morning. Said he was a resilient character, but nothing about coaching...

Edit: Already posted in 2other threads

 

[Gadzorks]

Well that leaves Murray Davis, Danny Daly, Mitch Hahn, Ben Hudson, Leigh Harding and Scott Borlace.

"Toxic culture" is a phrase that is thrown around quite a bit these days. What exactly does that entail? "Sick of losing"?

Which one has a kid playing afl?

 

[jackess]

Which one has a kid playing afl?

* Australian Rules Football

 

[Gadzorks]

Apparently the whole playing list are just a pack of whingers aswell.

So are those horrible fans on big footy!

 

[M Malice]

Which one has a kid playing afl?

great detective work there Gadzorks, we are narrowing down the leaker.

 

[Gadzorks]

great detective work there Gadzorks, we are narrowing down the leaker.

So do we have to plug him?

 

[Jimdog]

Is this a transcript of the board meeting?

Long time reader, first time poster.

Caro's mole on the board has provided me with the following video of Leppa's powerpoint presentation to the board this week:

 

[Jimdog]

Well that leaves Murray Davis, Danny Daly, Mitch Hahn, Ben Hudson, Leigh Harding and Scott Borlace.

"Toxic culture" is a phrase that is thrown around quite a bit these days. What exactly does that entail? "Sick of losing"?

 

[Skoob]

* Australian Rules Football

 

[3KZ is Football]

I only think it's fair that Dylan12 and I get to address the Board to explain why Leppitsch should be sacked.

 

[M Malice]

I only think it's fair that Dylan12 and I get to address the Board to explain why Leppitsch should be sacked.

i vote for Roylion to put the case forward for retention.

 

[Dalions]

OK so now I'm confused.

Are these "toxic" comments aimed at anything in particular or just generally? Is it in reference to the coaches or players or both?

Just general bitching, i think he has known he is on the outer for quite some time and just doesn't care what he says anymore. It is ok to say these things internally, but not to the general public.