It's satire.Straight male story hour lol that guy sounds very insecure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's satire.Straight male story hour lol that guy sounds very insecure.
That dude is one of the grievance studies hoax guys. He's been very active lately in identifying and promoting the issues with what he calls Critical Social Justice (CSJ). Essentially he claims that Critical Social Justice, which has its origins in Critical Theory and Post-Modernism, appears on the surface to be a lot like Social Justice but actually does very little for promoting social justice in practice. Instead, they co-opted the social justice terms, and a lot of other language to impose their version of the truth onto the world. He claims that this ideology has taken over schools and academia over the years. Politically, he self-identifies as a progressive Liberal, but now describes himself as politically homeless.What are we looking at here?
That's the main rub - many of the theories are inherently unfalsifiable. Not only does that make them un-scientific (even by social science standards), they are effectively just academic Kafkatraps.part of the problem is that critical theory is so damn abstract, unfalsifiable, and ever-changing.
After this is over I never want to hear people moaning about the welfare state again, I never want to hear people moaning about nurses again. Or porters.
These people are doing 14-hour shifts and not complaining. Wearing masks, and being left with sores, after risking their own health and their families' health selflessly.
But then I see someone complaining about being in a mansion with a swimming pool. And, you know, honestly, I just don't want to hear it.
On a positive note, another great commentary from the antithesis of political correctness, Ricky Gervais:
Gervais blasts ‘moaning’ celebs
The 58-year-old funnyman has taken aim at A-listers for complaining about the coronavirus lockdown, while also praising the efforts of healthcare workers.www.google.com
This guy gets it. Yes, he tells jokes about queers and disableds and Anne Frank. But they are jokes.
Whilst all these other celebs virtue signal and cry in their mansions, saying the "right" things and doing God knows what, here is a guy who pays his taxes, understands that actions speak much louder than words and has some effing perspective on life and respect for it.
Keep fighting the good fight, Ricky.
There are a lot of people like that.The thing with Ricky is he also an ardent critic of religion, he's a supporter of gay rights, etc. Wish there were more people like him.
There are a lot of people like that.
On a positive note, another great commentary from the antithesis of political correctness, Ricky Gervais:
Gervais blasts ‘moaning’ celebs
The 58-year-old funnyman has taken aim at A-listers for complaining about the coronavirus lockdown, while also praising the efforts of healthcare workers.www.google.com
This guy gets it. Yes, he tells jokes about queers and disableds and Anne Frank. But they are jokes.
Whilst all these other celebs virtue signal and cry in their mansions, saying the "right" things and doing God knows what, here is a guy who pays his taxes, understands that actions speak much louder than words and has some effing perspective on life and respect for it.
Keep fighting the good fight, Ricky.
Practically anything in its extreme form is dangerous.I should have been a bit clearer. People that support that stuff but are not on the politically correct bandwagon. My opinion is the political correctness (in it's extreme form) can be detrimental to the causes it supposedly supports.
Oh, you mean like debates about the UK grooming gangs that get flushed from social media?As lunatic as those views may seem, I'm not sure posting videos of debates that we would not have once had is a very effective way to argue that political correctness is stifling debate.
If anything, the trend is the opposite. With the explosion of media and the ability of anyone to self-public their thoughts via mass communication devices we have more debate now than ever before.
I'm not making a judgement call on the quality of debate, nor the topics of debate.Oh, you mean like debates about the UK grooming gangs that get flushed from social media?
Nice progress you have there.
View attachment 867985
Yet it is restricted to what is politically acceptable.I'm not making a judgement call on the quality of debate, nor the topics of debate.
I'm merely responding to the premise that debate is being stifled. Overall there is more debate now if you consider the explosion in data transmission globally that has close to doubled every few years this century.
and that is laterally untruthful.. u know that heaven only allows us to smack those who are not cognisant.. or else that we .. okay..Academic walks away because he would not engage in scientific lies:
Why An Accomplished Researcher Turned His Back On Academia
Colin Wright turned his back on academia despite investing over a decade of his life to it because of the ideological policing happening on campuses nationally.dailycaller.com
So you support van Diemens being able to express her viewsYet it is restricted to what is politically acceptable.
Her views are out and out lunacy, fresh out of todays Social Science classroom, but the default answer is yes.So you support van Diemens being able to express her views
You know Titania is a parody account right? If not, Google Andrew Doyle.