Is sandilands over rated?

pokerspiv

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Posts
4,714
Likes
2,667
AFL Club
Fremantle
#26
I tend to agree with Matthews about tap-work but it seems bizarre to single out Sandilands since his work around the ground is also the best in the league.

Someone posted yesterday that Sandilands has the most contested marks per game of any ruckman in the league.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Schauermann

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Posts
4,895
Likes
2,309
Location
Hamburg
AFL Club
Fremantle
#28
Well, I think expectations on ruckmen are often quite huge. They generally tend to average around 10 not 20 disposals. And only a few take a lot of marks or kick a lot of goals. Mostly the ones that spend a lot more time forward then Sandi.
 

Harry Reems

Premiership Player
Joined
Aug 28, 2010
Posts
4,350
Likes
8,243
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
#29
I think his comments were blown out of proportion, mainly thanks to Adrian Barich on the Channel 7 news last night. God help us if he had of said something along the lines of "Nick Naitanui is the only player ever to be selected All Australian based on potential rather than performance.

Sandi is currently ranked 1st for contested possessions and 2nd in hit outs and was BOG against Collingwood in round 1.

Naitanui is ranked 19th in contested possessions and averages 10 possessions a game.

Sandi has had an outstanding year thus far thanks to a full pre-season. Even on Friday night when we were slaughtered he was one of our better players.

He was AA for three years straight from 2008 to 2010 and won our fairest and best in 2009.

He's at the tail end of his career we all know, but he is still our number one ruckman.
 

MinerBoy

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jan 9, 2007
Posts
23,914
Likes
29,920
Location
Beyond The Wall.
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Other teams?
#35
Hi guys, hope you don't mind the intrusion.

To me the question shouldn't be about Sandilands but the position in general. As a ruckman, Sandi is one of the best. However, the position, while necessary, isn't as important as most others on the ground. Some people will have vastly different opinions to me on this and I accept that but I think ruckman are over rated in general, rather than yours specifically being over rated.
 

pokerspiv

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Posts
4,714
Likes
2,667
AFL Club
Fremantle
#36
Yeah I think that was the point Matthews was making.

Generally as long as you are providing enough of a contest to prevent the opposition ruckman from taking full possession, the main way a ruckman influences the game is in his work around the ground. Generally because midfielders tend to stick on each other during ruck duels, whoever wins the ruck is only a very rough guide to who wins the clearance.

Where a ruck knock can be really decisive is when one team has more numbers at the ball than the other and therefore the ruckman can direct it to a player on his own. Great example of that was Stephen Hill's final goal against Geelong in the final in 2013 (although Sandilands admitted he didn't see Hill and he was just going for the boundary line to preserve the lead).
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Clems Knee

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Aug 15, 2009
Posts
6,523
Likes
12,112
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
#37
Grant Thomas didn't rate ruck men. He was an average (at best) coach. Ross Lyon does. Enough said.

While hit outs don't matter too much, nor do clearances as stats. Because a clearance from the centre which dribbles over the boundary is given the same waiting as a Stephen Hill bullet pass to the chest of Matthew Pavlich. Hit outs to advantage, they matter. Sandilands is pretty good at them. Contested Marks matter too. Sandi does well there, when he is on. Does Flappy? (Cox's advantage is he is mobile like another midfielder, but I don't think he takes too many contested marks).

One ordinary game out of three and the Sandi haters come out of the woodwork. How about the two before?

Sandilands can dominate a game like no one else we have, except maybe Pav in the past, and Fyfe in the future. I realise Matthews was really just talking about hit outs being overrated, but Sandi is much more than that.
 

clogged

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 4, 2013
Posts
13,672
Likes
16,616
AFL Club
Fremantle
#38
Ruckmen vary in effectiveness during the home and away season, but are crucial in finals.

By contrast, very rarely do key forwards stand up and dominate big finals. But everyone agrees that you probably need at least one half decent one to go far.
 

pokerspiv

Premiership Player
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Posts
4,714
Likes
2,667
AFL Club
Fremantle
#42
erm ... your point?
Pretty obviously that hitouts have an extremely low correlation with winning. Half as strong as the next weakest stats (tackles/1%ers/stoppage clearances).

The interesting thing is how much more strongly kick differential correlates than handball differential. Obviously both are a measure of possession but there's a big difference between having more handballs than your opponent and having more kicks.
 

slicedndiced

Premiership Player
Joined
Feb 4, 2014
Posts
4,872
Likes
5,902
Location
still sinking
AFL Club
Fremantle
#43
You get synchonicity between a dominant ruckman and a mid and it is a thing of rare beauty.

Look at the combinations of Farmer and Cable, (gulp), Gardiner and Cousins and what we see with Sandi and Fyfe/Barlow.
 

valkorum

Club Legend
Joined
Feb 4, 2010
Posts
2,094
Likes
876
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
East Fremantle, Sacremento Kings
#44
You get synchonicity between a dominant ruckman and a mid and it is a thing of rare beauty.

Look at the combinations of Farmer and Cable, (gulp), Gardiner and Cousins and what we see with Sandi and Fyfe/Barlow.
Lets be fair, that was far more about Cousins than Gardiner
 

UFO Tatsu

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 11, 2012
Posts
6,393
Likes
9,651
Location
Perth, WA
AFL Club
Fremantle
#45
Pretty obviously that hitouts have an extremely low correlation with winning. Half as strong as the next weakest stats (tackles/1%ers/stoppage clearances).

The interesting thing is how much more strongly kick differential correlates than handball differential. Obviously both are a measure of possession but there's a big difference between having more handballs than your opponent and having more kicks.
in that case, we might as well delist all our ruckmen, save the salary cap and get dawson to ruck the whole game
 

strobe00

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Posts
5,081
Likes
2,493
AFL Club
Fremantle
#49
I did a similar analysis last year to the stuff Pokerspiv posted, except I used premiership points instead of margin as the criteria.

Inside 50s were the clear standout. Total Disposals, Uncontested Possessions and Kicks were a couple of notches below.

Winning the hitouts meant almost nothing. Clearances were mid-pack as well.

The major issue we had in the first half against Hawthorn was a woeful fumbliness around the clearances, an inability to win contested ball and an inability to pressure them quickly enough to bottle it back up. Our mids/Sandi let them shark Sandi's taps almost at will, and the Hawks didn't fumble when they were near the ball. Shifting Crowley, De Boer and Suban away from the centre clearances helped. By then, most of the damage was done. Confidence was shot and the game was out of our hands.

I said before the game that I thought De Boer's hands were as good as Fyfe's (in terms of giving off quick handballs)... what I forgot is how fumbly those hands are in picking up the ball. No point being a gun handballer if you can't pick it up. Suban was similar. Shifting Hill, Mundy and PearceD into the centre clearances and an onball role helped a lot there, as they were cleaner in picking it up and applied pressure much more quickly if we lost control of it.
 

Tayl0r

Moderator
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Posts
35,309
Likes
35,289
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Moderator #50
in that case, we might as well delist all our ruckmen, save the salary cap and get dawson to ruck the whole game
That would be silly, you'd play an extra mid at the bounce :)

--

If we don't have an even ruck contest our structure at the stoppage is dictated by the opposition starting points, because they will know where the ball will go and we will be chasing them to that spot.
 
Top Bottom