Is there another Collingwood forum?

[ShepBoy]

I think you will find that Joffa isnt at Nicks too much these days.

He is officially at Collingwood 365. You can talk to him there is you want.

 

[Stan.]

Hawks heroes im gunna ask someone at nicks to change the decision and get you unbanned.


I think it was just wrong what they did.

 

[Bucks5]

HH, most people were on your side in that thread on Nicks, it was one person who kept going on and on and on and on about oppposition fans invading our havens etc.

For the record, I don't mind having opposition fans on nicks as long as they don't overstep the line.

 

[Johnson#26]

That was urine weak by Nicks board.

The Hawthorn guy posted something positive, certainly not derogatory of Collingwood at all.

It was very petty and stupid, but that is Nicks I am afraid.

Yes, its harsh, but those are the rules. Each to their own.

 

[HAWKS HEROES]

I think you will find that Joffa isnt at Nicks too much these days.

He is officially at Collingwood 365. You can talk to him there is you want.

can you give me a link?please

 

[HAWKS HEROES]

Hawks heroes im gunna ask someone at nicks to change the decision and get you unbanned.


I think it was just wrong what they did.

thank you [still have not figured who you are on there]is it Hiya-and-Higher
as long as you do not get your self banned

 

[Jabso]

Nick's is very good content-wise.
We really need a good news site to come through. From the Outer was the best, The Magpies nest looked promising until it died down alot.

 

[ShepBoy]

The link to Collingwood365 is

http://forum.collingwood365.com/index.php?act=idx

 

[ShepBoy]

Yes, its harsh, but those are the rules. Each to their own.

But the point is, those are NOT the rules.

The rules say
Supporters of other AFL clubs may be warned just for showing up.

Warned does not = banned.

So the mods breached their own rules. Maybe they should ban themselves.

As I said, that's Nicks.

 

[HAWKS HEROES]

The link to Collingwood365 is

http://forum.collingwood365.com/index.php?act=idx

thanks

 

[Johnson#26]

But the point is, those are NOT the rules.

The rules say
Supporters of other AFL clubs may be warned just for showing up.

Warned does not = banned.

So the mods breached their own rules. Maybe they should ban themselves.

As I said, that's Nicks.

For showing up, yeah. But they obviously have their guidelines. Harsh, but its their game. It takea a fair bit to run a major site.

 

[Johnson#26]

Nick's is very good content-wise.
We really need a good news site to come through. From the Outer was the best, The Magpies nest looked promising until it died down alot.

Agree. Gee I miss FTO. It was the most perfect website in footy terms.

 

[HAWKS HEROES]

does not add up seeing i had been on there for 2 or so years silly if you ask me

 

[Bucks5]

Grug (The Brisbane) supporter posted on Nicks earlier during the week.

Seems some rules apply to some but not others. I think HH was banned to stop the carry-on by a certain poster.

 

[Johnson#26]

Grug's banned.

 

[tess]

The link to Collingwood365 is

http://forum.collingwood365.com/index.php?act=idx

Just remember you have to quote in full the previous poster when you post. Oh and you wont have to worry about me on that site, ya reckon Nicks is bad for banning you. 365 pre-banned me as soon as I registered I was banned.

This site and LSD were set up by the same mods that killed FTO btw. In both sites you can see whats missing.... talent.

 

[tess]

Agree. Gee I miss FTO. It was the most perfect website in footy terms.

No it wasn't J26. rather like Essendons claim to be bigger than the Pies, the FTO legend was created largely by themselves. Nicks Collingwood Page always had more info about the Pies, including the result of every game the Pies ever played.

 

[FIGJAM]

Can we please leave the squabbles of other sites to other sites?

Thank in advance.

 

[Lensen]

No it wasn't J26. rather like Essendons claim to be bigger than the Pies, the FTO legend was created largely by themselves.

Rubbish. Clearly the best multimedia site, Nick's is informative but didn't have anywhere near the video, audio and image stuff that FTO had.

And until certain drama queens (and yes, I'm including you - but not only you) decided they were more important than the continuation of the site, the forum was clearly the most open in terms of onfield discussion.

 

[jefffff34]

No it wasn't J26. rather like Essendons claim to be bigger than the Pies, the FTO legend was created largely by themselves. Nicks Collingwood Page always had more info about the Pies, including the result of every game the Pies ever played.

Get off it, From The Outer was brilliant, Nicks is microscopic in comparison to FTO.

 

[FIGJAM]

Haven't the guys from FTO been partly responsible for the official site being as good as it is??

 

[Lensen]

Haven't the guys from FTO been partly responsible for the official site being as good as it is??

As I understand it, yeah.

 

[ShepBoy]

No it wasn't J26. rather like Essendons claim to be bigger than the Pies, the FTO legend was created largely by themselves. Nicks Collingwood Page always had more info about the Pies, including the result of every game the Pies ever played.

There is nothing more bitter than a lover spurned.

 

[MarkT]

Can we please leave the squabbles of other sites to other sites?

Thank in advance.

Ban 'em!!!

 

[MarkT]

Collingwood 365, LSD are both good

LSD is far from one eyed. Pessimistic might often be a better description. Nicks is more your one eyed type of view. EB&W is a bit both ways. That's my take.

Never been to 365.