ISIS and Al Qaeda praise Trump. Celebrate the US attack on Assad

Remove this Banner Ad

LOL....You mean the first Gulf war (Kuwait) led by Bush senior in 1990, which lasted all of 3 months, as opposed to his sons full-scale invasion some 12 years later?

Don't go exaggerating in order to make a weaker than watery point.

Immediately following 9/11, U.S forces were deployed to Afghanistan in droves, within a fortnight....Principally to secure the poppy-fields & begin production of opium for huge profits en-masse....Then we had to endure 12 months of lies & fabrication over Saddams' WMD....Which the C.I.A, MI5 & Even German/French intelligence, all knew was complete bollocks.

Any weapons Saddam did have, were destroyed by Bush Senior....The U.S then imposed food sanctions on Iraq, effectively killing half a million children, before Bush Junior went in to finish them off....A defenseless nation, whose only crime was it's desire for independence....If it had no oil & wasn't situated next to Israel, the U.S wouldn't give a s**t about it.

And all of this is besides the point anyways....Why?....Because Iraq had f&ck all to do with terrorism or 9/11.

There's only one nation that lies through it's teeth when it comes to war & we all know who that is....The Disunited States of Delusional, at the behest of their Zionist, multi-national, neo-con masters.
Oh, ffs. So America invaded Afghanistan in order to get in on the opium trade and not, say, to be seen to be doing something, anything after they were attacked. Is there any conspiracy theory you won't subscribe to? The Afghanistan invasion was bullshit but it was done to make it look like America were in control of something after they had been so spectacularly caught short.

Also, your references on this page include Infowars and a Daily Mail article even they embarrassingly apologised for. They are both a joke.
 
Still relevant if bullshit.
images
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Still relevant if bullshit.


I've read lots of blame for Assad in this thread, but don't think I've seen one post blaming chemical weapons attacks on the US.

I am still trying to understand how after the Vietnam fiasco, Australia sends troops into wars that have nothing to do with Australia.
Now we are in a ridiculous situation where our Masters, the USA have now turned on their supposed allies. Turnbull sounds like a total idiot condemning Assad, when he was aware that Assad has been gassing his enemy for years and somehow justified supporting him. To make matters worse, Trump who during the election questioned why the US was involved in Syria, has now entrenched the US in another war. FFS get out of the Middle East.
 
Fair enough.

I suppose there are a bevy of articles proving Assad did the 2013 attack, and that it's just a matter of time before the slightly tardy mainstream media catches up with Donny and the War Machine, and prints the articles proving he did this one also.

I am still trying to understand how after the Vietnam fiasco...
The Gulf of Tonkin war you mean?
 
Oh, ffs. So America invaded Afghanistan in order to get in on the opium trade and not, say, to be seen to be doing something, anything after they were attacked. Is there any conspiracy theory you won't subscribe to? The Afghanistan invasion was bullshit but it was done to make it look like America were in control of something after they had been so spectacularly caught short.

Also, your references on this page include Infowars and a Daily Mail article even they embarrassingly apologised for. They are both a joke.

LOL....You really are a slow learner son....Not to mention a bona-fide Imperialist apologist to boot.

Firstly, I don't watch infowars nor read the Daily Mail....So much for that crud.

Secondly, it's an established Fact that that's what occurred, in spite of your hyperbolic rhetoric notwithstanding.

Now....Put the kettle on & have a nice cup of cocoa....Then do some actual independent research before coming into this thread & spouting off again Lad.

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/u-s-led-attack-on-afghanistan-begins

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_(2001–2014)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_production_in_Afghanistan

http://www.telesurtv.net/english/ne...her-Since-US-NATO-Invasion-20160831-0003.html
 
Last edited:
LOL....You really are a slow learner son....Not to mention a bona-fide Imperialist apologist to boot.

Firstly, I don't watch infowars nor read the Daily Mail....So much for that crud.

Secondly, it's an established Fact that that's what occurred, in spite of your hyperbolic rhetoric notwithstanding.

Now....Put the kettle on & have a nice cup of cocoa....Then do some actual independent research before coming into this thread & spouting off again Lad.

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/u-s-led-attack-on-afghanistan-begins

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_(2001–2014)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_production_in_Afghanistan

http://www.telesurtv.net/english/ne...her-Since-US-NATO-Invasion-20160831-0003.html
You keep using the word fact, but it clearly doesn't mean what you think it means ;)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You keep using the word fact, but it clearly doesn't mean what you think it means ;)

Have a look at the articles I've posted for you in that last reply.

Opium production in Afghanistan has increased 40 fold, since the U.S invasion in 2001, up until October 2016...All of it overseen by the C.I.A.

It's more profitable than arms sales.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top