It Still Burns!

Remove this Banner Ad

domus

Brownlow Medallist
Mar 31, 2008
12,489
22,120
Mooroolbark
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Mooroolbark footy club
I was watching the scrappy last quarter of the Gold Coast vs Essendon game and the ump called a blocking free against a GC defender. I watched the replay and gnashed my teeth. The ump said the infringer took his eyes off the ball when he momentarily checked a bomber forward. I have seen this free given a dozen times since the 2018 Grand final and reading Rosebury's comment's on the non-free only makes me angrier.

Rather than say he got it wrong or he was 100% right in his decision, he simply says it would have been controversial either way and the AFL had no problem with it. What BS. The simple question is did Rioli infringe by the letter of the law of the new blocking rule? Of course, he did. His eyes were on the player not the ball. He placed both hands on Maynard's chest and pushed while both were two to three metres away from the fall of the ball. The fact that commentators called it at the time and Maynard reacted immediately by saying he was pushed out shows the response from both player and observers was immediate and not an afterthought.

The fact that so many far less obvious blocking frees have been given since then with not an eyebrow raised makes me want to puke.

I know many Pie fans preach about moving on and not focusing on the past but it is ridiculous when you consider how many contentious moments there have been in a number of our grand final losses. It doesn't have to be that way but it seems we are destined to have them. Even the prelim last year had the Darcy Moore push in the back incident in the last ten minutes.:(
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What about the ball rolling into Willie Rioli’s boot in the goal square in the shadows of quarter time bringing the Eagles back to within 16 points?

Everything that could have possibly gone wrong in that game did go wrong
 
What about the ball rolling into Willie Rioli’s boot in the goal square in the shadows of quarter time bringing the Eagles back to within 16 points?

Everything that could have possibly gone wrong in that game did go wrong
That was a teeth gnasher. Complete arse and had them going to the quarter time huddle with belief restored.
 
Rather than say he got it wrong or he was 100% right in his decision, he simply says it would have been controversial either way and the AFL had no problem with it. What BS. The simple question is did Rioli infringe by the letter of the law of the new blocking rule?
But the reality is that he was neither totally right or totally wrong. The game isnt umpired to the letter of the law and it'd be a lesser game if it was. A bit of in the back is allowed. A bit of blocking is allowed, etc. .
 
But the reality is that he was neither totally right or totally wrong. The game isnt umpired to the letter of the law and it'd be a lesser game if it was. A bit of in the back is allowed. A bit of blocking is allowed, etc. .
That rule was applied with great regularity that year. It was brought in to stop the blocking of the man trying to contest his opponent in the air and some of the frees given were incredibly tiggy touchwood. You only had to take your eyes off the ball for a second then do a simple hip and shoulder block and you were penalized. The GF incident was not one of those fifty fifty occasions. Rioli faced him and looked at him and shoved him in the chest with both hands which meant he could not contest the Sheed mark. Rioli was never in the contest for the mark. It was a free every day of the week for an umpire with courage and integrity.

In fact, there were two far softer blocking frees given in the last term of our titanic clash with the Blues last year. One saved us when Cameron was awarded a free after Cripps took a strong mark and the other to AJ. He kicked a goal from that free and started our comeback. Neither was as blatant as the block on Maynard.
 
That rule was applied with great regularity that year. It was brought in to stop the blocking of the man trying to contest his opponent in the air and some of the frees given were incredibly tiggy touchwood. You only had to take your eyes off the ball for a second then do a simple hip and shoulder block and you were penalized. The GF incident was not one of those fifty fifty occasions. Rioli faced him and looked at him and shoved him in the chest with both hands which meant he could not contest the Sheed mark. Rioli was never in the contest for the mark. It was a free every day of the week for an umpire with courage and integrity.

In fact, there were two far softer blocking frees given in the last term of our titanic clash with the Blues last year. One saved us when Cameron was awarded a free after Cripps took a strong mark and the other to AJ. He kicked a goal from that free and started our comeback. Neither was as blatant as the block on Maynard.
Imagine how pissed off you would have been if that one to Cameron that stopped Cripps's shot in goal had have been against us. A Collingwood player gave a massive push to get the Carlton player out if the contest. That Carlton player was pushed into Cameron. Free to Cameron.
 
Imagine how pissed off you would have been if that one to Cameron that stopped Cripps's shot in goal had have been against us. A Collingwood player gave a massive push to get the Carlton player out if the contest. That Carlton player was pushed into Cameron. Free to Cameron.
But those decisions always go against us in grand finals. It's uncanny. Imagine how pissed off Carlton fans would be if they had lost five or six GF's by less than 10 points, had two draws when they were leading both games comfortably and had controversial umpiring decisions or non decisions decide the outcome.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

It's actually worse than the push in the back to McKenna in 1970 or the Wayne Harmes in 1979.
Worse because as has been pointed out, it was a focus of umpiring all year, and was an incredibly blatant obvious free kick. It was basically impossible to miss unless all 3 umpires were facing the opposite direction.
But that's West Coast, and that's Collingwood in grand finals.
 
The Vardy goal was worse btw, it was a clear cut no questions push in the back uncalled

This. And the phantom free against Grundy in the middle which got the ball down to Vardy in the first place.
 
That was the momentum changer

From memory we got a few goals up in last quarter thanks to a burst by JDG. Kick a goal, tail up then that bullshit centre bounce free that got little coverage or replays
That moment was missed by the tv coverage at the time it happened on the day. They never showed a replay of that free or said what it was for. It looked like one of those frees plucked out of the ump's arse where neither ruckman knows who has got the free or why. Most ruck frees at centre bounces are more like an attention grab from umps than any free for a genuine infringement. That shattered our momentum from that point on.
 
That moment was missed by the tv coverage at the time it happened on the day. They never showed a replay of that free or said what it was for. It looked like one of those frees plucked out of the ump's arse where neither ruckman knows who has got the free or why. Most ruck frees at centre bounces are more like an attention grab from umps than any free for a genuine infringement. That shattered our momentum from that point on.
It appeared premeditated to me. Umpire saw the game slipping away to the pies and pulled a bullshit one out to even scores up
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top