Kens actually 5-6 against the crows believe it or not
Ahdonbilivit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Kens actually 5-6 against the crows believe it or not
But Charlie doesn't run up the ground. He sets up at CHF when the ball is bounced then moves into the centre square where he stays for long periods. He never gets deep enough into attack to run down the ground. I have no argument with the theory you are espousing but Charlie isn't taking big contested grabs, he is winning the ball in scrambles or taking marks from short kicks. We could use other players for that, Westhoff's name springs to mind, he is more mobile than Charlie, almost as tall and has a reasonable pair of hands. In fact last year Ken was using Westhoff as a tall midfielder and Charlie as our key forward. Somehow I do not think Ken has got out of the damage control mode that he was forced into with Ryder's injury.
Why is it we are so preoccupied with how the other team plays? When are we going to focus on how we want to play and force the opposition to counter that? I agree we have a game plan based on defence and a frustratingly tedious movement out of defence but that does not mean our best big forward has to become a victim of the strategy. On that basis I think some of the statements about Dixon's form are unwarranted. Play the guy in the role he plays best then criticise.
A question for all Port supporters, which Charlie Dixon would you prefer, Charlie Dixon 2017 or Charlie Dixon 2018. I know which one I want to see and I also know that I am not likely to see it under the current strategy.
Means he was 4-1 up at one stageKens actually 5-6 against the crows believe it or not
And nearly losing the game after being 3 goals up in Q4. But I'm just relieved we won. Very grateful to the players that really wanted that win.The first half had all the hallmarks of kern. Work our backsides off, win contested ball, limit their inside 50s and still kick only 3 goals in a half of footy.
Reading through a few of these posts. Jeez, some of you guys, if you can’t enjoy a win then what’s the point of following a footy team?
NeverKens actually 5-6 against the crows believe it or not
CarnI enjoyed the hell out of the win, but im still expecting the imminent return of hinkleyball. Maybe after the suns game cause they're complete trash
Happy to nominate my punchable face for repeated thrashings if it means a flag.Ken's better when he gets angry. We're better when Ken gets angry. I want a return to the days when he almost snotted Shaun Hart in the coaches box (as long as it doesn't entail Hart returning to the club in any capacity).
Thank you Tredders. Finally some truth.I posted this in the Media Nod's Head thread but it is also relevant here. It is an extract from a Warren Tredrea article published in The Monopoly Times last Thursday. I can recommend the article to all Port supporters.
Tredders writes ...
After last weekend’s 42-point thrashing at the hands of West Coast, Power coach Ken Hinkley said: “One side was really strong in the contest, one wasn’t.”
Words like these would embarrass a football club, especially one that has prided itself on its never-say-die attitude for over 147 years.
Last weekend’s loss to West Coast was a shocker — lacking effort, discipline and competitiveness.
and this...
Make no mistake, the Power is on notice.
Coach Ken Hinkley isn’t exempt, after being backed in by the club’s board with a huge three-year contract extension after last season’s finals capitulation against the Eagles. He must find a way to fire up his players so they perform and stay on edge.
The club’s on-field leaders are also under the microscope, too often the heavy lifting is left to too few while others go missing in action.
Talent has never been Port Adelaide’s problem. Attitude and being able to consistently bring effort is.
There is a clear distinction between people who have been bought up within the PAFC culture and those who have been imported. Many imports have done well and we should acknowledge their efforts but they could not have written that article with that passion. Well done for calling it as it is Tredders.
Ken is the absolute master of identifying problems after the event. Anyone who watched that West Coast match will tell you we were not hard enough what we want to know is, 'why, and what are you going to do about it Ken'? Ken has the first bit, identifying a problem, right but he also has to get the second bit, fixing the problem, right.
You are so right. I was down in the dumps last week but stuff it, I’m going to milk this one for all I can.Reading through a few of these posts. Jeez, some of you guys, if you can’t enjoy a win then what’s the point of following a footy team?
Perfect opportunity for Channel 7 to show they're not propaganda mouth pieces for the AFC.
Means he was 4-1 up at one stage
They have 2 Crows shows and yes they are the media department of the AFCBut they are. They openly admit it. They have a show on their network called ‘The Crows Show’ FFS.
Reading through a few of these posts. Jeez, some of you guys, if you can’t enjoy a win then what’s the point of following a footy team?
We loved it, celebrated etc, but 1 swallow and all that. But let's not forget the reason this thread exists. Jury is still a long way out.
We loved it, celebrated etc, but 1 swallow and all that. But let's not forget the reason this thread exists. Jury is still a long way out.
Lol yeah this ^Carn. Everyone enjoyed the win.
But if this result matters so much against the tone of the thread, why haven't the 30-odd soul-destroying losses where we were favourites, didn't turn up, or blew leads?