Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch Izak Rankine Part II

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jeffcrowe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Do you think the 4 week suspension handed to Rankine is reasonable?

  • Yes

  • No - too harsh

  • No - not harsh enough


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Jeffcrowe

Cancelled
Veteran 10k Posts
Joined
Sep 28, 2014
Posts
26,270
Reaction score
36,952
AFL Club
Adelaide
That wasn’t the question, it’s yes or no.

Look, you threw up a childish strawman and you’re at least smart enough to know you’re cornered. Can you at least agree that price matters, even if we disagree on the price?
Hahaha no way

If we were offering that it would have been ticked off with GC 5 mins into trade period

I think GC wants future picks for academy and we want later picks this year for Michaelanny match and that’s where the hold up is

As I’ve said the speed of the deal isn’t the important bit , getting Rankine and Michaelanny and a player in between those picks is main thing we want out of this trade / draft period
 
Crows he was head of football then did list manager role at same time in the end ?

Then brisbane - head of football ( would have been involved in list management decisions but working with list manager )
D63D0334-9DB6-4C9E-A6AA-0227A3B18C03.png
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Improve their draft hand, if the right person was there, I took that to mean move up.


Jeez how many times does he say “improve our hand”.

You might be right but it might be about getting more picks or turning 10 and 29 into two teen picks or something
 
Jeez how many times does he say “improve our hand”.

You might be right but it might be about getting more picks or turning 10 and 29 into two teen picks or something
I thought I heard it somewhere else but it might have been a someone’s interpretation.
 
I think he thought he could be Stephen Wells in that way but Stephen Wells is a bit more cunning
Ummm, Damn straight, there is a lot more than the numbers. You can’t think just numbers.
I think Wells took it many levels.
 
Hahaha no way

If we were offering that it would have been ticked off with GC 5 mins into trade period

I think GC wants future picks for academy and we want later picks this year for Michaelanny match and that’s where the hold up is

As I’ve said the speed of the deal isn’t the important bit , getting Rankine and Michaelanny and a player in between those picks is main thing we want out of this trade / draft period

So if you won’t pay 2 firsts and a second then you don’t want Rankine.

Wowee!!!!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Yes. Its how trade value is worked out. Based on the last 3 years he is worth around pick 15.
Lot of bull crap mate. Trade value is how they’d start your car.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If gc are saying a future second or no deal id be telling rankine see you in the psd.
Maybe he meant the crows would not part with a future 1st for Rankine, but he thinks just a future 2nd will get the deal over the line. So we keep pick 5 this year AND our 2023 1st and just pay a future 2nd for Rankine. Where do we sign
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom