Kirby
Shambolic Rube
Yes and should have been AA last year imho.In contention for AA?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.


If you are seeing this notice, posts and uploads you make now may be lost when we cut over to the upgraded system. This should only last a few hours.
Post feedback, issues, errors and omissions here. Read the OP first, please.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yes and should have been AA last year imho.In contention for AA?
You don't get in until your second year at the level. Whilst it sounds wrong, i don't mind it. It's a high achievement accolade, when in doubt give it to the bloke who hS been playing at that level for longer.Yes and should have been AA last year imho.
Totally agree. Crisp has been super down back and has lost none of his pace despite bulking up a bit to play down back.And still a very decent wingman.. what was he averaging over 20.. and those on the run sausage rolls with the obligatory fist pump re..
Langdon and Crisp were both actually quite decent playing on the wing. Something to always fall back on.
Can play centre square too. Bloody good footballer.And still a very decent wingman.. what was he averaging over 20.. and those on the run sausage rolls with the obligatory fist pump re..
Langdon and Crisp were both actually quite decent playing on the wing. Something to always fall back on.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It's wrong and it's very inconsistent. It's just a throwaway line the selectors, or those on tv at least, use to kill conversation and controversy.You don't get in until your second year at the level. Whilst it sounds wrong, i don't mind it. It's a high achievement accolade, when in doubt give it to the bloke who hS been playing at that level for longer.
The only inconsistency is that they occasionally let a highly touted youngster skip earning his dues. The way i see it is that half the time there is no right answer, there's just a bunch of highly subjective decisions. When splitting blokes, duration of excellence seems an appropriate criteria to me.It's wrong and it's very inconsistent. It's just a throwaway line the selectors, or those on tv at least, use to kill conversation and controversy.
Yep our steak knives are made from Valerian steel.What is best for us is he signed for another 5 yrs and has cost hardly anything and has been and continues to be a fantastic signing for us probably the best signing for us from another club for a long while.
The club really nailed it with Jack,I saw Jack in a couple of games for the Lions in his last season there and boy did,nt they get that one wrong not I am complaining,high class player and individual is Crispy.
I likes.Yep our steak knives are made from Valerian steel.
I’m really glad after an off-season injury that he made it to round one. I know consecutive games aren’t everything but he’s building up a pretty good collection and it would have been a shame to break that run.
100 games for Collingwood this weekend!
100 games for Collingwood this weekend!
I wonder what length of career is the longest with consecutive games?
So game 1 till which number game was the exact full career?
In test cricket, Adam Gilchrist had the record I believe with 96 uninterrupted tests, being his whole career.
Tony Greig had the record for a long time with 58.
But now it’s Brendon McCullum with 101 consecutive tests being his whole test career.
100 games for Collingwood this weekend!
Really???Absolutely criminal that this bloke didn't at least make the AA squad.