Player Watch Jack Crisp

[Spiral_Out]

There's no way it will be a suspension, it didn't even warrant a dangerous tackle free, it was a poor umpiring decision and will be thrown out.

 

[nahnah]

Genuine question. Was crispy playing defence most of the night?

Seems to be playing wing this season. Heat maps dont give much away these days with how high defenders and forwards push up though. Most of Perryman's possessions yesterday were on a wing but seemed like he played defense

 

[BillyElliott]

Zero Hanger

He's been reported. That's a fact. Has nothing to do with Zero Hanger reporting on a report

Edit : penalised by the umpire for a dangerous tackle.

 

[jmac70]

He's been reported. That's a fact. Has nothing to do with Zero Hanger reporting on a report

When was he reported?

 

[Kes1984]

What time would we expect to learn his fate?

 

[Kes1984]

When was he reported?

Yeah I didn’t see him reported.

 

[Pragmatic Shill]

He's been reported. That's a fact. Has nothing to do with Zero Hanger reporting on a report

Unless a dangerous tackle free kick is an automatic report, he hasn't been reported.

 

[Kes1984]

There's no way it will be a suspension, it didn't even warrant a dangerous tackle free, it was a poor umpiring decision and will be thrown out.

I wish I had your confidence.
While it SHOULDN’T be a suspension you just never know how they’ll rule these things!

 

[jmac70]

Unless a dangerous tackle free kick is an automatic report, he hasn't been reported.

I’m sure ElliottsMaggies will clear up this confusion shortly.

 

[BillyElliott]

I’m sure ElliottsMaggies will clear up this confusion shortly.

Shoot me. He was penalised for a dangerous tackle.

Crisp was penalised for a dangerous tackle by the officiating umpire, with the actions of the Magpies midfielder potentially earning the scrutiny of the MRO also.

If deemed a reportable offence, Crisp would be charged with rough conduct, with the gradings of conduct and contact likely to be viewed as 'careless' and 'high' respectively, with the impact grading likely to determine whether he receives a fine or a suspension.

 

[BillyElliott]

Unless a dangerous tackle free kick is an automatic report, he hasn't been reported.

Okay Penalised for a dangerous tackle. MRO will be looking at it.

 

[sr36]

Unless a dangerous tackle free kick is an automatic report, he hasn't been reported.

It's all just semantics - the old fashioned "report" doesn't really apply in the modern set up. It'll be looked at by the MRO - who then decides if it is a reportable offence and if it is grades it - which spits out a consequence.

 

[BillyElliott]

What time would we expect to learn his fate?

I think tonight.

 

[jmac70]

Shoot me. He was penalised for a dangerous tackle.

Crisp was penalised for a dangerous tackle by the officiating umpire, with the actions of the Magpies midfielder potentially earning the scrutiny of the MRO also.

If deemed a reportable offence, Crisp would be charged with rough conduct, with the gradings of conduct and contact likely to be viewed as 'careless' and 'high' respectively, with the impact grading likely to determine whether he receives a fine or a suspension.

So, he wasn’t reported, it’s not “a fact.”

 

[BillyElliott]

So, he wasn’t reported, it’s not “a fact.”

The Zero Hanger article says exactly what happened. Okay, the umpire didn't report him, but we all know it will be the same consequence. The MRO is looking at it, yes? That's what the article says.

 

[jmac70]

The Zero Hanger article says exactly what happened. Okay, the umpire didn't report him, but we all know it will be the same consequence. The MRO is looking at it, yes? That's what the article says.

A good reporter always checks the facts.

 

[PiCkLeJuiCe]

random thought. I reckon once he break the Stynes record, he will actually get better as a player because he will play more freely.

He'll now break Stynes' record in game 496. How many game do you expect the poor guy to play after that?

 

[BillyElliott]

A good reporter always checks the facts.

Zero Hanger got it right

 

[ipswichpies]

When was he reported?

He was not reported just penalise for a dangerous tackle,about 2 mins into the match careless if anything nothing malicious at all and West the youngster he tackled I think was surprised he was awarded a free kick.

 

[sideswipe]

He'll now break Stynes' record in game 496. How many game do you expect the poor guy to play after that?

Once again, no penalty or a fine are the most likely outcomes


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[jmac70]

Zero Hanger got it right

YOU told me that Crisp has been reported and that it was a fact.
YOU got it wrong but don’t seem able to admit that.

 

[Black_White]

Can clearly see the dogs player turn his own head into the ground. Was pointed out by the Fox panel after the game.
They almost went as far as to dogs player was staging. Didn’t want to say it, but implied it.
Need I say, it was a dog act from the dog player…..

 

[BillyElliott]

YOU told me that Crisp has been reported and that it was a fact.
YOU got it wrong but don’t seem able to admit that.

Oh my. I said he was reported, yes. Should have said the umpire penalised him for a dangerous tackle. As we know the MRO will now look at.

The article, Zero Hanger, was correct.

I made an error. Shoot me. As sr36 said, it's all semantics.

 

[jmac70]

Oh my. I said he was reported, yes. Should have said the umpire penalised him for a dangerous tackle. As we know the MRO will now look at.

The article, Zero Hanger, was correct.

I made an error. Shoot me. As sr36 said, it's all semantics.

I don’t care about the error, it’s the problem you have with it that I find amusing.

 

[BillyElliott]

I don’t care about the error, it’s the problem you have with it that I find amusing.

I don't have a problem with it. You seem to though.

I've already said, shoot me twice, and I made an error .

I'm more concerned about Crisp having his consecutive game streak broken when the MRO looks at.