- Joined
- May 2, 2008
- Posts
- 4,967
- Reaction score
- 4,343
- Location
- Perth
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC
Re: Jack Grimes potential AA???
You don't see it.
You don't see it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Turnovers yes, although sometimes its none per game other times it might be 2. But I don't see him putting team mates under pressure, generally he uses great options that open the game up. He gets it what about 25 times per game so their will be some times he does, but nowhere near as much as Bruce as a rule.I love Frank Grimes, but the bloke does put the team mate he's giving it to under a crazy amount of pressure every time he gets the ball. Every week there is one or two direct turnovers from him that result in a opposition goal.
Am i the only one who see's this?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I love Frank Grimes, but the bloke does put the team mate he's giving it to under a crazy amount of pressure every time he gets the ball. Every week there is one or two direct turnovers from him that result in a opposition goal.
Am i the only one who see's this?
please dont insult me.First post I have seen of yours & you bag out a player. In fact you used you 2nd post to bag out Grimes.
Has bigsexc created another alias?


cant think of that many players in his position playing better than him. malceski, hodge.. maybe gilbee.. he is having an outstanding season,
just because no jackwatts-style articles are in the paper (i have a close friend at a certain 'big' paper, and heard a whisper that one of those lame feature articles soon.) doesnt mean he is not hyped. if you watch any melbourne games you would know that when he does something well the commentators call with 'a star' or 'a super young player'.
i think on SEN kevin bartlett even said he was close to AA form.
soo.. umm..
I think Grimes will always get a lot of possessions, but I've found his better games are not necessarily when he racks up 30 touches (The North game as an example) but when he gets 20 and shuts down a man (Round 2 against Collingwood, flogged Didak and got 20 odd).
He isn't going to get near AA this year, but it is scary to think he hasn't even played 30 games yet. I think a good comparison is to Heath Shaw, and I think he'll be better than Shaw (Who is probably top 3 in his position in the game).
cant read huh..? poor kid..Sorry BS I didn't read the Age this morning, so it could be more BS as far as I know.
He is better than Heath Shaw. There is a massive difference between Shaw's best and worst prformances. I think that Hodge and Goddard have the flanks sown up. Enright should get a pocket, the other one is open. Fletcher has been good but if he keeps playing like he did against Geelong then he won't get it, Malceski has been in a bit better form as has Frawley than Grimes. If people are mentioning Russell then surely Grimes definately deserves to be consided.He isn't going to get near AA this year, but it is scary to think he hasn't even played 30 games yet. I think a good comparison is to Heath Shaw, and I think he'll be better than Shaw (Who is probably top 3 in his position in the game).
Poor Jack Watts, with riewoldts 10 today gonna put even more pressure on him lol
But as has been said previous he is too young still and still skinny as a rake. If he had the stature of moloney he would be getting more goals..