All of the players are afl employees. Otherwise the entire AFL deal would be a massive breach of employment law.How is an employee of the AFL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
All of the players are afl employees. Otherwise the entire AFL deal would be a massive breach of employment law.How is an employee of the AFL
So every player in the country even the blokes running around in the ressies in country football are AFLemployeesAll of the players are afl employees. Otherwise the entire AFL deal would be a massive breach of employment law.
So every player in the country even the blokes running around in the ressies in country football are AFLemployees
So who is the employer on the pay slip...But he’s not working for Carlton or GC, he’s working for the AFL. If he chooses not to go to work at the company (the club) his employer (the AFL) nominates (the draft etc) then he gets to resign as an AFL player.
Yeah, nah.Let's say Jack Martin has been told by the Suns that they will re-draft him in the PSD for arguments sake.
I'm not really clear on the rules, but could Martin 'retire'? I know this is weird as he is OoC, but he then may be able to be picked up in the pre-season supplementary selection period? Shane Mumford was and he was retired. Is there any requirement that the player has nominated for the most recent draft or is it simply up to the AFL to tick off anyone who wishes to be listed this way?
Obviously this is a s**t show of a way to get to your club of choice, but a possibility? Carlton could rookie list him, pay him whatever they see fit and then just elevate him the next year.
Why don't you take it up with those blues fans?
Absolutely it holds up. It’s done every day with contract labour hire companies.
Provided he’s being paid the agreed salary and other conditions and the workplace is safe then it’s completely fair and reasonable.
Get to it thenWhy not with you?
Draft picks that 15/18 clubs pass rather then use is overs for anything?54 and a future fourth is overs for Pittonet, Newnes and an over the hill Betts, so they’d want to secure Martin.
That's strange coming from a Richmond fan. Over the last few years your club has made ordinary players (ordinary at the clubs they were playing for) like Caddy, Nankervis, Grigg, Houli etc in to best 22 premiership players. I would think of all fans, Richmond fans would get it; that a change of environment can do wonders for a player who has stagnated or is keen to move to another club for whatever reason.Pittance! The only thing Pittance you'll get is Martin's contribution. Ordinary player asking for huge money.
Martin isnt a fan of May. Just for your infoIt was told to me confidentially. It’s hardly surprising though is it? Martin just doing his due diligence.
How do you know this?Martin isnt a fan of May. Just for your info
Get to it then
Martin isnt a fan of May. Just for your info
Absolutely it holds up. It’s done every day with contract labour hire companies.
Provided he’s being paid the agreed salary and other conditions and the workplace is safe then it’s completely fair and reasonable.
The only thing I’d question is the provision for geographically disadvantaged. As an example an employer can move your office at its discretion, provided it’s within 50km (or some such distance) from your employing office as listed in your contract.
SureThis is what I've heard too, he didn't like the way May was being tough on him for being lazy.
Sure
If thats what you've heard, not sure May should be commenting on a player being lazy.
You made a vague statement without any direction, if you would like me to answer it at least ask an actual question.I already did, you're very good at avoiding questions
You made a vague statement without any direction, if you would like me to answer it at least ask an actual question.
Go find what I am repeating, get back to me and i'll let you know why.
If thats what you've heard, not sure May should be commenting on a player being lazy.
Well go on then, what am I repeating.There was nothing vague about it
Well go on then, what am I repeating.
So you don't actually have anything you just made it up to troll, good day.Haha, here you go again. Circular arguments avoiding the original question, if you're going to keep this up don't bother replying because it's pointless and boring.
It is funny seeing you accuse others of doing the same thing though