- Mar 25, 2003
- 35,681
- 28,334
Jack's an excellent footballer. Nick is a level or two above.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FYP!Nick was an excellent footballer. Jack is a more reliable forward.
But a Nick doesn't win flags and a Jack has!Nick by so far, it's not even funny.
Jack is excellent but Nick was honestly amongst the best footballers of his generation.
Statistically and based on accomplishments Jack is superior.
But Nick is the better player.
They would be No. 2 and 3 in terms of key forwards since 2000 imo
But a Nick doesn't win flags and a Jack has!
Well Nick has 2 more All-Australians, 4 more club b&fs and 1 more MVP.Jack has 3 more Coleman Medals, 1 more premiership and 5 more club leading goalkicker awards.Gary Ablett Sr vs Ashley Hansen
Eddie Betts vs Steven Armstrong
Tony Lockett vs Tom Boyd
Robert Harvey vs Drew Banfield
Nathan Buckley vs Mitch Morton
Which are the superior players - the former, or the latter?
Are the Riewoldt's the best set of brothers in VFL/AFL history? Would have to be close.
They're not brothers.Are the Riewoldt's the best set of brothers in VFL/AFL history? Would have to be close.
SEMANTICS <_<
You're missing the point! Jack provides a better structure coz he kicks goals. Nick wasn't able to be that focal point for the Saints; 3 GF appearances = less than Jack for 1! I REST MY CASE!
Umm ...what part of that comment that you replied to do you not understand?!?Pretty sure Ablett Snr and Lockett kicked a few goals in their time. Unless youre mounting a case for Sumich over Ablett Snr and Longmire over Lockett. In which case I eagerly await your response
Better than Fevola? Absolutely.Assuming you have Franklin as 1, are you really rating them above Fevola, Lloyd, Richardson, Tredders, and Pavlich to name a few?