I didn't even say it would vanish from the media cycle, though.
I don't deny that we're dealing with a difficult areas but your points feel more general on the issue rather than specifically for me.
You suggested this deserved to be 'background media noise', though. If it was your brother who was stabbed, would you still believe that was the best scenario?
I'm simply making the point that the issue is serious enough that Steven's status as a footballer can't possibly be a good reason to relegate the question of family violence to a place of ancillary concern.
By the way, I'm sure that's not what you're saying. You clearly believe the broader issue is worthy of significant attention in the general media so that the prevalence and intensity of these conflicts is not simply blithely perpetuated across generations.
So your issue seems to be that it is an invasion of Steven's privacy and/or some impediment to him getting back to doing his job. Which is all true. In response, I would simply note that I see those outcomes as inevitable, given his status, the media's hunger for copy, and the seriousness of the issue involved.