- Joined
- Jan 13, 2006
- Posts
- 2,408
- Reaction score
- 120
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Melbourne
I just told you how it was mischievous: Watts turned 19 in March 2010, Riewoldt not until October 2007. So Watts played the entire year as a 19-year-old, and Riewoldt as an 18-year-old. More precisely, as I already stated, Watts was seven months older in 2010 than Riewoldt was in any equivalent round in 2007. In 2008, Riewoldt was five months older than Watts was at the same stage of 2010. Not that difficult to understand I would have thought.
Now, what's Watts' biggest bag in the VFL?
Hilarious. Sorry, I thought we were having a serious football discussion, but it turns out you just want a fap session. All the players I mentioned have talent I would consider in the top 10-20% in the AFL. Whether they will all reach their potential is another matter, as it is for Watts. Martin and Cotchin are not unproven - they have proved they can take an AFL match by the scruff of the neck, they have proved they can take on and beat the best. I'd argue that if Watts gets anywhere near what Jack Riewoldt has already produced you should be very happy.
You reckon that these players have "talent I would consider in the top 10-20% in the AFL"
Morton age 22 games 12 last year
Connors age 22 games 14 last year
Griffiths age 19 games 5 last year
Taylor age 19 games 4 last year
In a side that is considered by most to be shit, these "star players of the future" could only managed to collectively get selected in a total of 33 out of a possible 88 games.
Yeah right.












