- Joined
- Aug 26, 2016
- Posts
- 12,136
- Reaction score
- 15,090
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
The club wanted to get him away from Davorkian.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

That is yet to be seen.Don't think it is an issue as Scharenberg also did the same trip during the year and he seems to have benefitted.
Hopefully they are looking into every aspect of his rehab. Too many players do the opposite knee the next season.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You sooked up when I used your name here a few months ago after you changed your user name. Don't be a hypocrite.Good work howi
How you you know? Not all of us live lives of misery like you.
I think Loki's head just explodedHis not miserable, your just happier then his.
I actually had to think about that.
But seriously, 99.99% of the population appear happier than TG. I hope it's untrue and that you live a very full and happy life, TG.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I agreee thanks for bringing back on topicThis is concerning. Ramsay is a big part of what we hope will be the make-up of our back six. When you consider Sinclair is also injury prone we're a bit vulnerable for small lock down defenders.
That is a problem with our list which has a lot of injury prone players. That's why injuries are not really an excuse because we almost know who is going to get them.Hopefully not a break a leg year, but a make or break year for Ramsay
I mean he's safe on the list, but needs to put together an uninterrupted season if he is going to develop further into the player that the club and fans think he can be.
Another injury spoilt year and the club looks to bring in a running back like Pittard or Saad from another club
But the same could be said of Sinclair, Scharenberg, Broomhead
The one thing I hope Dunn can bring is run out of the backline as one on one he's not great. We still need someone like Sinclair back there for pace and meters gained. Sinclair brought something creative off half back and opened up the games for us.I always like how people blame autocorrect, as though their eyes can't recognise a mistake, and that the backspace and/or edit post buttons don't exist.
As for Ramsay, does anyone else feel like Maynard has kind of taken his spot? I feel like the following back six will be part of our best 22:
B: Keeffe - Dunn - Maynard
HB: Howe - Reid - Langdon
Hoping to see Scharenberg in there before too long.I always like how people blame autocorrect, as though their eyes can't recognise a mistake, and that the backspace and/or edit post buttons don't exist.
As for Ramsay, does anyone else feel like Maynard has kind of taken his spot? I feel like the following back six will be part of our best 22:
B: Keeffe - Dunn - Maynard
HB: Howe - Reid - Langdon
Your mate Pablo already displayed his hypocrisy using real names on this forum earlier. I'll ask you to stop too and let you know the mods have already taken note. Cheers.Will do Stu
No one has said ya name champYour mate Pablo already displayed his hypocrisy using real names on this forum earlier. I'll ask you to stop too and let you know the mods have already taken note. Cheers.
One on one is actually where Dunn does his best work with his strength and positioning.The one thing I hope Dunn can bring is run out of the backline as one on one he's not great. We still need someone like Sinclair back there for pace and meters gained. Sinclair brought something creative off half back and opened up the games for us.
The mods don't see it that way. And FYI I didn't report you over it, but a PM conversation has taken place. Don't be a hypocrite.No one has said ya name champ
Well I heard defensively one on one he's pretty poor.One on one is actually where Dunn does his best work with his strength and positioning.
Ramsey is better than Langdon imo. Also unlikely we go in with three defenders imo, especially when Langdon, Scharenberg and Howe are all good intercept marks who play third tall. I reckon if we were considering playing 3 tall defenders at once we would have tried harder to keep Frost or Brown.I always like how people blame autocorrect, as though their eyes can't recognise a mistake, and that the backspace and/or edit post buttons don't exist.
As for Ramsay, does anyone else feel like Maynard has kind of taken his spot? I feel like the following back six will be part of our best 22:
B: Keeffe - Dunn - Maynard
HB: Howe - Reid - Langdon
I like Ramsay but after 9 games as compared to 46 and a top10 Copeland finish its a bit early to say he is better than Lanngdon imoRamsey is better than Langdon imo. Also unlikely we go in with three defenders imo, especially when Langdon, Scharenberg and Howe are all good intercept marks who play third tall. I reckon if we were considering playing 3 tall defenders at once we would have tried harder to keep Frost or Brown.
B:Sinclair, Dunn, Ramsey
HB: Howe Reid Maynard
Scharenberg or Langdon on the pine.
Depends which opponents we're talking about. Against the taller mobile opponents like Franklin he's actually quite good. Against the smaller, speedier opponents such as Eddie Betts, he's poor. So I guess we need to be careful how we play him, depending on match ups.Well I heard defensively one on one he's pretty poor.