- Jan 12, 2011
- 25,401
- 35,580
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
He is not the only source suggesting it, if he was I'd agree with youThank the lord almighty the tweet is from such a reliable source!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is not the only source suggesting it, if he was I'd agree with youThank the lord almighty the tweet is from such a reliable source!!
He maybe didn't know?Why be involved in a betting syndicate that bets on AFL games????
Doesn't he see this potential risk coming?
This seems to be emerging as the true storySo if it was a mate in a betting syndicate that placed the bet, and he had no idea, and when he found out he let the AFL know.
Come on now.So if it was a mate in a betting syndicate that placed the bet, and he had no idea, and when he found out he let the AFL know, I think we have an all class kid here. Would have been so much more like a 19yo to try and hide it. His mates are also around 19 I'd expect, so I wouldn't blame them either. Kids making silly decisions. It's not like they were betting to make thousands or affect the result of a match.
The only loophole that lets him off the hook is that the bet was knowingly placed against his wishes/conditions for being a part of the syndicate.Maybe he did and that's why he reported it as soon as he was told what had happened.
To be fair he usually is on the moneyThank the lord almighty the tweet is from such a reliable source!!
Seems like he's been an almighty fool. Likely a heave suspension coming. No chance of not knowing the rules. This sounds like it's way, way worse than Thomas/Keefe accidentally taking a prohibited substance.
Become new grey area if he straight away self reports saying that’s not what he wanted or allowed for.Not sure how this makes a big difference. Someone placed a bet on his behalf. Surely on joining the syndicate he would have made clear what bets can/cannot be placed on his behalf.
Not even close.
Thomas / Keeffe ‘accidentally’ took a prohibited substance in the process of undertaking an illegal activity. It’s like breaking into somebody’s house and ‘accidentally’ tripping over a power cable - gee, what a klutz!
Nobody is suggesting that anything that Stephenson did is related in any way to illegal activity.
Can’t buy that.Seems like he's been an almighty fool. Likely a heave suspension coming. No chance of not knowing the rules. This sounds like it's way, way worse than Thomas/Keefe accidentally taking a prohibited substance.
You’ve answered my post.Meh, jaywalking is illegal. Doesn't make it as bad as what Stephenson has done.
The difference is, as far as I can tell, he DELIBERATELY broke the rules. That's intent. That's worse than Thomas/Keefe.
Can’t buy that.
Taking illegal substances is different than doing a legal activity.
Ricky Nixon tweeted that it might not be what everyone thinks.
He's in a betting syndicate and they put a bet on Pendles to get most possies v Saints.
One of the guys told Stevo a few weeks later and he self reported. AFL don't think he has done anything wrong.
If this is true then he done all he could do .A fine should be all he gets and maybe told to drop any betting syndicates ,even then why should he be responsible at all if he didn't know until after it was all over.
Give the kid a pat on the back for being honest .
Funnily enough, AFL players betting on AFL games might be illegal as early as next year, when the new national sports integrity commission and framework is set to be established.You’ve answered my post.
I think the point here is illegal v legal.
A separate discussion is breaking AFL rules v not intending but breaking AFL rules.
But interesting discussion nonetheless.
Seems it was for horse racing and someone did a bet on a Pies playerWhy be involved in a betting syndicate that bets on AFL games????
Doesn't he see this potential risk coming?
It suggests this wasn't about profit or spot fixing. If the bet was placed out of ignorance then he still bears responsibility and based on the past it will be significant. If he can show the bet was knowingly placed against his wishes then I can't see any wrongdoing.Become new grey area if he straight away self reports saying that’s not what he wanted or allowed for.
I’d think that does change things somewhat.
CRAPMeh, jaywalking is illegal. Doesn't make it as bad as what Stephenson has done.
The difference is, as far as I can tell, he DELIBERATELY broke the rules. That's intent. That's worse than Thomas/Keefe.
And he was at the breakfast yesterday.He is at training this morning.