Recommitted Jake Carlisle [re-signed for 2021 with a trigger for 2022]

[Lore]

Out of contract this year, new thread

 

[The Nostradamus]

Free agent?
what’s the latest rule with players who have played across multiple clubs?

 

[Lore]

Free agent?
what’s the latest rule with players who have played across multiple clubs?

Good question. He should be a normal out of contract player, as he was traded after 6 years at Essendon and wasn't eligible for free agency.

If he had've got to free agency the first time he would have it every time he was out of contract after that though.

 

[aussierulesrules]

Seems very much like he has/had no interest in leaving, so unless that changes, his ability to get another contract with us will largely be determined by how he goes this year, and in particular how he applies himself.

Seems highly likely that we shopped him around last offseason, at least until Keath knocked back our offer and chose WB. Had Keath chosen us, I dare say Jake would be at another club right now.

Hope ge gets right back to his pre-back injury best though, as that Jake was bloody good and would have been up to his ears in the 2018 B&F- after coming 3rd the previous season.

 

[The Nostradamus]

Anyone have a link in regards to players who have played for multiple clubs and how free agency eligibility affects them?

from memory there was a new rule last year which would affect players like jake

 

[Lore]

Anyone have a link in regards to players who have played for multiple clubs and how free agency eligibility affects them?

from memory there was a new rule last year which would affect players like jake

Anyone who has been a free agent before is a free agent every time they come out of contract after that. I probably put the link in the resources thread pinned to the top of the board.

Jake was traded after six years of service, he wasn't a free agent yet, so he's never been a free agent and is not a free agent when he comes out of contract.

 

[The Nostradamus]

Anyone who has been a free agent before is a free agent every time they come out of contract after that. I probably put the link in the resources thread pinned to the top of the board.

Jake was traded after six years of service, he wasn't a free agent yet, so he's never been a free agent and is not a free agent when he comes out of contract.

Ahk so they have to have essentially played 8 years at their first club then once out of contract at their next clubs they would be a free agent

 

[Lore]

Ahk so they have to have essentially played 8 years at their first club then once out of contract at their next clubs they would be a free agent

Or be delisted at any time. Once a DFA, always a FA.

 

[james Dean]

s**t bloke. Washed up player

hard pass

 

[aussierulesrules]

s**t bloke. Washed up player

hard pass

Got better and better as the game wore on tonight. Looked much more like his old self by the end.

 

[Ambrosia]

Got better and better as the game wore on tonight. Looked much more like his old self by the end.

Definitely still a quality player.

 

[The Nostradamus]

Is this bloke in their best team?

 

[ScrappyDo]

Is this bloke in their best team?

%100 yes..

 

[Falchoon]

Is this bloke in their best team?

arguably our best player when fit

 

[The Nostradamus]

arguably our best player when fit

That seems more an insult on the saints if anything

Hill goes alright

 

[Elmer_Judd]

Pies and North should have a Look if the Saints decide to move him on.

Not sure if Ratts is a fan of Carlisle and his off field issues.

 

[Ambrosia]

I know it won't happen but I would take him back at the Dons. He would be an excellent Hooker replacement.

 

[Bulldogs85]

I know it will not happen but I would take at the bulldogs if he wanted to come

 

[The Nostradamus]

I know it will not happen but I would take at the bulldogs if he wanted to come

Yeh can see why

 

[bird_man]

Sounds like he is going to sign a two year deal soon.

I feel like he's flown under the radar this year, but he is playing as good as he ever has so I'll be be happy to see him sign.

 

[t_94]

Sounds like he is going to sign a two year deal soon.

I feel like he's flown under the radar this year, but he is playing as good as he ever has so I'll be be happy to see him sign.

Was previously overrated. Now underrated.

 

[bird_man]

Was previously overrated. Now underrated.

Been a consistently good player for the Saints. Only seemed to struggle when he was having the issues with his back IMO.

 

[The Nostradamus]

Sounds like he is going to sign a two year deal soon.

I feel like he's flown under the radar this year, but he is playing as good as he ever has so I'll be be happy to see him sign.

2 years to stay would be surprising
Would have thought just 1 for his age

2 to get him to move

 

[bird_man]

2 years to stay would be surprising
Would have thought just 1 for his age

2 to get him to move

How old do you think he is?

 

[projectv]

2 years to stay would be surprising
Would have thought just 1 for his age

2 to get him to move

With Nathan Brown retiring I could easily see him staying for another two years, provided his back injuries don't continue to hamper him.

He's not that old, only 28.