He's shown enough to certainly demand retention. He was far more assured with the ball yesterday. There was one kick that ended up ok but was a kick in board that just found our player (happened right in front of where I was sitting). A turnover would have seen an almost certain goal to the Tigers. He is still prone to the odd brain fade but these appear to be occurring less commonly now.
Has he shown enough to be kept out of trade discussion? I see TW on Futures today mentioned him as part of the Ablett trade. Its one reason Im really in love with the prodigal son trade... To easy to say.. he will be good to handy ..but Ablett could give us 2 years of special and do the trade ..and then blow 4 years of development and who knows how many games to come.
If I was a betting person , id say the RD would say we can find another p40 that we can develop again or find a Stewart or even say we can play House or Gardner etc... So Id like to see the club sign him to show he is off the table.