Okay. Since I'm not familiar with it, could you tell me what ongoing development those clubs did through the program, and how it benefited the game in NSW? Melbourne clubs recruited Dunstall and Crosisca and made them into stars, but I don't think that really did much for the game in Queensland until the Lions did the same with Voss and Akermanis.Victorian clubs used to have NSW Scholarship programs until the AFL ran all of the AFL clubs out of NSW with the invention of the Northern Academies.
The other 14 have plenty of talented youngsters they can recruit without the fear of a go home factor, who play in junior competitions that are at a high standard. The Northern clubs don't. It makes sense for them to train the best local talent more intensively to increase their chances of making it to the top, while getting as many players as possible without a go home factor, to assist them in not turning into Brisbane between 2009-2016. And that period was despite having an academy.the AFL then realises its not fair allowing 4 clubs free access to talent meanwhile the other 14 have no access
This is total rubbish. That's what Auskick is for, and it can be expanded if necessary to get more immigrant families into the game. How much does mere encouragement to play the state's dominant code have to do with producing elite talent for the senior level? In the Northern academies it's about taking players like Heeney who were going to play rugby because it was the dominant code in the state, and redirecting them to our game. In the AFL heartland, I doubt there was any major risk for most of them to go to rugby. I can count on one hand the number of players that Victoria has produced in professional rugby league, most of them being from either England or NZ and therefore ineligible for an NGA anyway.so they create the NGA's as a way for us to have our own versions and to help encourage Immigrants who would normally not play football to play
This is an issue to do with the marginalisation of Aboriginal people in society and wealth, nothing to do with the spread of the game to otherwise disinterested communities or helping clubs with a serious go home factor.and to help Indigenous pathways to the AFL
This is precisely the sort of program that should be run by a centralised AFL centre of excellence rather than giving a handout to clubs that are already privileged. Why do the Bulldogs deserve preferential access to Ugle-Hagan when they're able to attract several players from the go home factor? Why does Fremantle deserve preferential access to Liam Henry when they've attracted Brad Hill, Hogan, Lobb, Conca, Hamlin, Wilson, McCarthy, Matera, Colyer and Kersten back to Perth in just the last three seasons?
If all clubs had a level playing field with recruitment and retention then I might agree with you. But they don't.this bickering to whether or not you believe your academy is just or unjust is silly, as all academies are old fashioned zoning recruitment catchment areas and they should all be ended or all be allowed imo.
Barely? The Swans have a huge grassroots support. They got huge crowds to Stadium Australia, and people in Sydney love to turn up for big events even if they're not the greatest at week to week support. The shot in the arm it would have given AFL support in Sydney with a couple of grand finals there would have been huge.and as for hosting the GF, sydney can barely support 1 AFL team let alone host a GF