He won't ever be at Port - That's for certain.
What - like the Cornes brothers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
He won't ever be at Port - That's for certain.
Mate, you were over on the Port board whinging that we have a James Aish thread. You gots lots of love from the flogs on their board, you can always go back there for more back slapping and high fiving.Dumb decision?
Not trading pick 12 + Polec for Tippet was a dumb decision mate.
Drafting a highly talented kid in a NATIONAL draft, isn't.
What - like the Cornes brothers?
I know, but did you ever think they would? It was good recruitment to pick the best player and ignore all of the outside stuff ... the fact that Aish has a tight link to Adelaide doesn't mean that another club couldn't make him theirs.they were drafted -
different scenario
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Tippett? Yeah the deal should have been done. But It was only that you refused to include Polec that held it up - how did that work out for you?
Better than it worked out for the Crows.
Coming over to an opposition's thread and being a smart ass. Okay...
Aish will sign again with Brisbane.
Coming over to an opposition's thread and being a smart ass. Okay...
As much as you can say that, he is absolutely right. We did lose more by not accepting then they did.
Had we accepted, we'd have more draft picks etc.
would we have had a choice if he demanded it?Would we have traded Dangerfield to Geelong in 2010 or 2011? No effing way. Same story.
when was this on the table? fuaaaaark would not have minded it!Dumb decision?
Not trading pick 12 + Polec for Tippet was a dumb decision mate.
Drafting a highly talented kid in a NATIONAL draft, isn't.
would we have had a choice if he demanded it?
when was this on the table? fuaaaaark would not have minded it!
exactly.Not really, then we would have faced the choice, first round pick or put them in the PSD to make a stand. I know which one I'd be angry at my club for doing
we would essentially have gotten 4 first rounders!As much as you can say that, he is absolutely right. We did lose more by not accepting then they did.
Had we accepted, we'd have more draft picks etc.
That wasn't on the table from Brisbane, that's what we wanted. The rumour differs from different folk I know who follow Brisbane but they were offering pick 12 and I think 30 for Tippett and we wanted 12 with either Redden or Polec. Of course, with hindsight it is fair to say that Brisbane knew of the explosive contract we had with Tippett and must have been shocked that we were playing hard ball, all things considered
how would brisbane know about tippett's illegal contract? wasnt it like hardly even illegal
wasnt it like hardly even illegal
what was actually so illegal about the contract? i was under the impression that the club had organised sponsorship with one of their sponsors (balfours?) to sponsor tippett as well as there being a release clause meaning he would definitely leave after 2012 which for some reason isnt allowed. the sponsorship is similar to what players like judd have been offered in the past isnt it? or am i just completely wrong and we did something much worse..Well, we illegally had him on our list for three years, that's why we got such a heavy penalty. Well that and the fact we only came forwarded about it when we were painted into a corner
what was actually so illegal about the contract? i was under the impression that the club had organised sponsorship with one of their sponsors (balfours?) to sponsor tippett as well as there being a release clause meaning he would definitely leave after 2012 which for some reason isnt allowed. the sponsorship is similar to what players like judd have been offered in the past isnt it? or am i just completely wrong and we did something much worse..